Hi,
Vote to release Apache Zeppelin 0.5.0-incubating passed with the following
results:
4 binding "+1" votes, no "0" or "-1" votes.
IPMC binding votes were provided by:
Konstantin Boudnik
Justin Mclean
Edward J. Yoon
Jan Iversen
Here's vote thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incuba
Thanks all IPMC for kind assistance.
I'll send vote result email and proceed next steps.
Thanks,
moon
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:52 AM jan i wrote:
> On 23 July 2015 at 01:49, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > Given that issues were addressed (or are work in progress) and the 72
> hours
> > windo
On 23 July 2015 at 01:49, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Given that issues were addressed (or are work in progress) and the 72 hours
> window has passed (eg anyone who wanted to chime in had a chance to do it)
> I'd
> call the vote and send the official result email to this list. Then follow
> with
Given that issues were addressed (or are work in progress) and the 72 hours
window has passed (eg anyone who wanted to chime in had a chance to do it) I'd
call the vote and send the official result email to this list. Then follow
with the rest of required steps like moving artifacts, etc.
Thanks
Thanks everyone for valuable concern and comment to the first release of
Apache Zeppelin (incubating).
Like Alexander mentioned, community will quickly address issues raised
here, over the next release.
I'd like to learn more how the vote goes. While this vote has four +1, is
it okay to close this
Thank you guys for resolving the raised issues so quickly!
Cos
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:25PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote:
> Got it, thank you very much, Justin, for the explanation!
>
> On behalf of the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) PPMC I have contacted
> the original author and he agreed to con
+1 (binding)
jan i.
On 22 July 2015 at 10:31, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> > On behalf of the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) PPMC I have contacted
> > the original author and he agreed to contribute this code, with the
> > proper Apache 2.0 licence header, directly to the Apache Zeppelin
> > (incubatin
> On behalf of the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) PPMC I have contacted
> the original author and he agreed to contribute this code, with the
> proper Apache 2.0 licence header, directly to the Apache Zeppelin
> (incubating) codebase as a separate patch.
> So it is going to be resolved completely, to
Got it, thank you very much, Justin, for the explanation!
On behalf of the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) PPMC I have contacted
the original author and he agreed to contribute this code, with the
proper Apache 2.0 licence header, directly to the Apache Zeppelin
(incubating) codebase as a separate pa
Hi,
> Regarding the issue raised by Edward - we were under impression that
> this particular contribution is covered by
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/NOTICE#L53
> (as we use the code from
> https://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=1361 that was not
> merged
Apologies for not timely response.
Thank you Konstantin and Justin for your reviews - we have filed the
issues to track that your feedback is going to be addressed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-174
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-175
Regarding the issue raised by E
Thanks to Justin for his thorough review, as always.
I have pinged back the Apache Zeppelin community to see if we could
quickly address the issue.
- Henry
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
>> Has the author of
>> zeppelin-server/src/test/java/com/webautomation/ScreenCaptu
> Has the author of
> zeppelin-server/src/test/java/com/webautomation/ScreenCaptureHtmlUnitDriver.java
> signed a ICLA?
It looks like came from Selenium community -
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/selenium-developers/Ivan$20Vasiliev$20%7Csort:relevance/selenium-developers/PTR_j4xLVRM/
Hi,
+1 binding
Please fix the LICENSE/NOTICE issues are fixed for next release. Given
everything involved is Apache comparable it's more a documentation issue but
still important to get right. If you need a hand or need it reviewed before
your next release just ask.
The LICENSE/NOTICE issues
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:51PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Hi Cos,
>
> Thanks for providing a thoughtfully documented review.
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
>
> > Please consider fixing in the next release:
> > - sha checksum is formatted in a wa
Hi Cos,
Thanks for providing a thoughtfully documented review.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> Please consider fixing in the next release:
> - sha checksum is formatted in a way that makes automatic validation (with
>sha512sum -c ) impossible. Al
+1 (binding)
Checked the sha checksum and the signature - Ok.
Built/ran RAT check - Ok. Some tests are failing during the verify phase, but I
guess it doesn't make the release invalid.
Please consider fixing in the next release:
- sha checksum is formatted in a way that makes automatic validati
Hi all,
Apache Zeppelin community has voted on following RC to be releaseed
as official Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating release.
Since this is first release after under Apache Incubator,
we would like to hear more feedback from incubator community
and please help to verify and vote
18 matches
Mail list logo
