Given that issues were addressed (or are work in progress) and the 72 hours window has passed (eg anyone who wanted to chime in had a chance to do it) I'd call the vote and send the official result email to this list. Then follow with the rest of required steps like moving artifacts, etc.
Thanks Cos On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:31PM, moon soo Lee wrote: > Thanks everyone for valuable concern and comment to the first release of > Apache Zeppelin (incubating). > Like Alexander mentioned, community will quickly address issues raised > here, over the next release. > > I'd like to learn more how the vote goes. While this vote has four +1, is > it okay to close this vote and post result or are there more things to > consider? > > Best, > moon > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:13 AM Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Thank you guys for resolving the raised issues so quickly! > > > > Cos > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:25PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote: > > > Got it, thank you very much, Justin, for the explanation! > > > > > > On behalf of the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) PPMC I have contacted > > > the original author and he agreed to contribute this code, with the > > > proper Apache 2.0 licence header, directly to the Apache Zeppelin > > > (incubating) codebase as a separate patch. > > > So it is going to be resolved completely, together with 2 other issues > > > raised here, over the next release. > > > > > > Edward J. Yoon, does this explanation and actions taken make you more > > > comfortable with changing your opinion\vote? > > > > > > Please let us know. > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > -- > > > Kind regards, > > > Alexander > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > >> Regarding the issue raised by Edward - we were under impression that > > > >> this particular contribution is covered by > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/NOTICE#L53 > > > >> (as we use the code from > > > >> https://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=1361 that was not > > > >> merged to the selenium, keeping the attribution) > > > > > > > > It depends on how that original code is licensed and if you have > > permission to use the code from the author. I don't know the exact > > particulars, and it may be fine, but it seem unclear to me. This probably > > doesn’t have to be sorted in the this release but would need to be sorted > > before graduation, but other IPMC member may hold different opinions. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Justin > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > -- > > > Kind regards, > > > Alexander. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
