Hi,
The vote to release Apache YuniKorn (incubating) 0.11.0 RC2 has passed with
3 +1 binding votes, 1 +1 non-binding vote and 1 +0 non-binding vote.
+1 Binding votes:
- Felix Cheung
- Justin Mclean
- Wangda Tan
+1 Non-Binding vote
- Weiwei Yang
+0 Non-Binding votes
- Xun Liu
The vote was succ
+1 from me:
Checked:
- incubating in name
- both of Signatures/hashes are good
- LICENSE/NOTICE good
- No unexpected binary files
- Checked all source files have ASF headers
- Compilable from source
-Wangda
On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 11:18 PM Xun Liu wrote:
> hi Weiwei Yang
>
> Thank you for your
hi Weiwei Yang
Thank you for your prompt reply.
+1 (non-binding) from me.
Best regards
Xun Liu
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 1:51 PM Weiwei Yang wrote:
> hi Xun, Justin
>
> Thanks for the suggestion!
> I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YUNIKORN-789 to
> address this.
>
> On Sun, Au
hi Xun, Justin
Thanks for the suggestion!
I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YUNIKORN-789 to
address this.
On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 10:48 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I have a question.
> > I did not see the two files `NOTICE` and `DISCLAIMER` in the
> > [1],[2],[3],[4] r
Hi,
> I have a question.
> I did not see the two files `NOTICE` and `DISCLAIMER` in the
> [1],[2],[3],[4] repo of incubator-yunikorn.
It would be good if they are there, but what matters is if they end up in the
release artefacts.
Thanks,
Justin
-
+0 (non-binding) from me, I have checked the following items:
- Incubating in name
- LICENSE are fine
- All links are valid
- No unexpected binary files
- All ASF files have ASF headers
- Built docker images from the source
I have a question.
I did not see the two files `NOTICE` and `DISCLAIMER`
HI,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are good
- LICENSE and NOTICE file
- no unexpected binary files
- all source files have ASF headers
- can compile from source
Kind Regards,
Justin
-
To un
+1
I checked that issues from RC1 are fixed
On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 6:43 AM Julia Kinga Marton
wrote:
> Hello IPMC
>
> The Apache YuniKorn community has voted and approved the release of Apache
> YuniKorn (incubating) 0.11.0 (RC2). We now kindly request the IPMC members
> review
> and vote for t
Hello IPMC
The Apache YuniKorn community has voted and approved the release of Apache
YuniKorn (incubating) 0.11.0 (RC2). We now kindly request the IPMC members
review
and vote for this release.
YuniKorn is a standalone, universal resource scheduler that can support
both long-running and batch wo
Hello all,
Thank you for checking the release so far. Since there were discovered some
license issues,
I'm cancelling this vote.
We'll correct this problem and re-release shortly.
Thank you,
Kinga Marton
Hi,
> the ./web component is in the release but I don't see its dependencies
> (even as MIT licensed) listed?
Dependancies don’t need to be mentioned in the LICENSE file if they don’t end
up in the source release.
Kind Regards,
Justin
Similar questions from me
- incubating in name
- signature and hash fine
- DISCLAIMER is fine
- No unexpected binary files
- LICENSE and NOTICE
the ./web component is in the release but I don't see its dependencies
(even as MIT licensed) listed?
Is anything bundled in there?
- these source file
+1 (binding)
-- --
??:
"general"
https://git
We are not using any of the polyfills except for the one that is mandatory
(zone.js) which is part of the angular framework.
The angular framework is not part of the source tar. The zone.js file is also
not part of the source tar.
The polyfills.ts file just defines that it will be imported when
Hi,
> The base settings are code generated. The software that generates these base
> setting is angular. It shows up as a MIT license [1].
> The file content after the generation is part of the created project which
> then gets customised.
You might want to double check that. A quick glance th
> On 30 Jul 2021, at 18:22, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> [3] is a settings file. The comments should have been cleaned up when the
>> settings were customised.
>
> Presumably the file (and it comments) are copyright to someone and under some
> license? Do you know who/what that is?
>
Hi,
> [3] is a settings file. The comments should have been cleaned up when the
> settings were customised.
Presumably the file (and it comments) are copyright to someone and under some
license? Do you know who/what that is?
Thanks,
Justin
[1] was added as part of jira YUNIKORN-505.
[2] was added as part of jira YUNIKORN-427.
Both are apache files: jiras have been logged to add the headers.
[3] is a settings file. The comments should have been cleaned up when the
settings were customised.
I have filed a jira for the cleanup. The
Hi,
-1 (binding) as there files missing headers and a possible license issue. If
the licenses of these files are clarified my vote can change.
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE may be OK, except this file? [3]
- NOTICE is fine
- No un
+1 (non-binding) from me, I checked the following items:
1. LICENSE and NOTICE files exist
2. All links abovementioned are valid
3. Signature and checksum are good
4. Successfully built the image on my Fedora32.
Best regards
Chao Zhang
https://github.com/tokers
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 4:04 PM J
+1 (non-binding) from me, I have checked the following items:
- Incubating in name
- LICENSE and NOTICE is fine
- All links are valid
- No unexpected binary files
- All ASF files have ASF headers
- Build from scratch
- Built images from the source
- Ran all unit tests
Best regards
Xun Liu
On Thu
Hello IPMC
The Apache YuniKorn community has voted and approved the release Apache
YuniKorn (incubating) 0.11.0. We now kindly request the IPMC members review
and vote for this release.
YuniKorn is a standalone, universal resource scheduler that can support
both long-running and batch workloads.
22 matches
Mail list logo
