[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating)

Trafodion still has several licensing issues. Regards, Roberta -Original Message- From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 3:34 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating) Also note that I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating)

Also note that I started a thread on it [1]. It appears that the source files you're using have been relicensed under the BSD-3-clause, as a result I would recommend switching to those versions. In light of the clarification of Cat-X, I have to change to a -1 due to licensing issues. [1]: https:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating)

HI, > Maybe we need clarification from legal? BSD 4 clause is just 3 clause w/ > additional ask to not use UoC to endorse. It seems still in line w/ AL so > I would assume no problems. The 4 clause BSD license is considered category X other than in a couple of cases i.e. OpenSSL where the proje

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating)

Hi, > As for the BSD license - the following text was added to the LICENSE file: > > Is there a better way to deal with this issue? That’s a good way to deal with this 4 clause BSD issue, given the large amount of text in the LICENSE I guess I missed that, sorry. The short form (a pointer to a

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating)

to deal with this issue? Regards, Roberta -Original Message- From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 9:49 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating) Hi, Not having a good day and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating)

Justin, I don't see [1] (may be missing) Maybe we need clarification from legal? BSD 4 clause is just 3 clause w/ additional ask to not use UoC to endorse. It seems still in line w/ AL so I would assume no problems. John On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:48 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Not havi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating)

Hi +1 (non-binding from Trafodion PPMC) Downloaded client package and checked the ODBC client with readelf readelf -d *.so | grep ssl 0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libssl.so.10] 0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libssl.so.10] Thanks Suresh O

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating)

Hi, Not having a good day and responded to the wrong vote thread. Correcting. Sorry but it's-1 (binding) from me as: The LICENSE issue raised with last release re the 4 clause BSD license has not been dealt wth. The installer, client and server packages are missing a DISCLAIMER file. [1] The li

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating)

Here's my +1 However, I would strongly encourage the PPMC to also cast (non binding where appropriate) votes on the list to indicate their support as well. John On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 4:48 PM Steve Varnau wrote: > Hello, > > > > This is a call to vote on the patch release 2.0.1-incubating (Re

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating)

[mailto:steve.var...@esgyn.com] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 1:47 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating) Hello, This is a call to vote on the patch release 2.0.1-incubating (Release Candidate 1). The changes were small, just to address things

[VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.1 (incubating)

Hello, This is a call to vote on the patch release 2.0.1-incubating (Release Candidate 1). The changes were small, just to address things that came up in the 2.0.0 reviews, primarily addressing the issue that prevented providing a convenience binary of the clients package. Changes since 2.