Also note that I started a thread on it [1]. It appears that the source files you're using have been relicensed under the BSD-3-clause, as a result I would recommend switching to those versions.
In light of the clarification of Cat-X, I have to change to a -1 due to licensing issues. [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/684c32e14a435b40f2941b79f2d5dac747a0c4d02387f2e1a6e8e622@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 6:32 PM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > HI, > > > Maybe we need clarification from legal? BSD 4 clause is just 3 clause w/ > > additional ask to not use UoC to endorse. It seems still in line w/ AL > so > > I would assume no problems. > > The 4 clause BSD license is considered category X other than in a couple > of cases i.e. OpenSSL where the project has said it’s OK to use the NOTICE > file to deal with that extra clause or in this case where the clause has > been later removed. So in most cases it can’t be included in Apache > software. The newer BSD 2 clause and 3 clause licenses are of course fine. > > There's a recent discussion about this on the legal discuss list. [1] > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201606.mbox/%3c749a6c00d2595a4b39533e26f4e5e...@mail.gmail.com%3e > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
