I have a few comments on this release process.
1. If an IPMC member has voted +1 on a release, that vote is valid regardless
of which list the vote was held on. It's the bits that are important. [1]
2. For clarity, when a successful vote is held on the podling's dev list, the
vote thread on the
Hi,
There are two important things I want to mention:
1) 72 hours have not been completed for this vote. So, let's wait for it.
2) Carrying over binding votes from dev list to general is something people
have been talking about for a while now. Let's carry it into another mail
thread in general.
It seems to me that knowing who has carryover votes is not important for a lazy
consensus vote.
The +1 votes are not really required except in the rare case they might be
needed to counter a -1; in which case I'd suggest intentional action following
the -1 would make more sense than saying "oh
> On May 22, 2021, at 8:44 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I think that IPMC votes of Mentors must automatically carryover. (Means the
>> VOTE thread is clearly linked, not just RESULTS (This one was not.))
>
> IMO The IPMC members (if any) who voted on the podlings dev list need to
Hi,
> I think that IPMC votes of Mentors must automatically carryover. (Means the
> VOTE thread is clearly linked, not just RESULTS (This one was not.))
IMO The IPMC members (if any) who voted on the podlings dev list need to be
clearly stated in the vote email sent to the IPMC general list. Th
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 22, 2021, at 6:24 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>>> Was this vote open 72 hours?
>>
>> If you mean on dev@nlpcraft? Then the answer is yes. It started on May 13.
>
> It needs to be 72 hours on the incubator list as well.
I think that IPMC votes of Mentor
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 22, 2021, at 6:30 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Justin was oblique and cut context. My iPhone and Apple Mail have been
>> junking emails that I have to unjunk. Some I never find.
>
> Contest was which list it was sent to I’m sure your email client show
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine (you might want to consider unsing sha 512)
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is fine
- year in NOTICE is incorrect, please fix (this is also incorrect in the
README.md)
- files have ASF headers
- no unexpected binary
Hi,
> Justin was oblique and cut context. My iPhone and Apple Mail have been
> junking emails that I have to unjunk. Some I never find.
Contest was which list it was sent to I’m sure your email client shows that.
Justin
-
To un
Hi,
>> Was this vote open 72 hours?
>
> If you mean on dev@nlpcraft? Then the answer is yes. It started on May 13.
It needs to be 72 hours on the incubator list as well.
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@inc
Justin was oblique and cut context. My iPhone and Apple Mail have been junking
emails that I have to unjunk. Some I never find.
Justin many people have asked you not to cut so much context in your replies.
Do you understand why Justin?
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 22, 2021, at 4:51 PM, Daniel
> On May 22, 2021, at 4:21 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> HI,
>
>> PPMC vote has already provided a required majority approval and hence this
>> vote is a lazy consensus vote open for 72 hours.
>
>
> Was this vote open 72 hours?
If you mean on dev@nlpcraft? Then the answer is yes. It started
1. Calvin Kirs's vote was non-binding.
2. The only two binding votes were carried over from the PPMC. Seems the main
purpose of posting on this list is to get review from IPMC members who have not
yet seen it.
3. As Justin pointed out, 72 hours haven't passed, giving IPMC members other
than tho
HI,
> PPMC vote has already provided a required majority approval and hence this
> vote is a lazy consensus vote open for 72 hours.
Was this vote open 72 hours?
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.ap
Hi,
The vote to release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client (incubating) 0.7.5 has
passed with 3 +1 binding votes.
[3] +1 Binding votes:
- Paul King
- Furkan KAMACI
- Calvin Kirs
[ 0 ] +0 Binding votes
[ 0 ] -1 Binding votes
The vote is successful.
Thank you to the above IPMC members for taking the
+1 non-binding
I checked:
Download links are valid.
Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER-WIP files are fine.
All files have license headers if necessary.
The year of NOTICE has not been updated, it is best to modify it in the
next version.
Paul King 于2
+1 binding from me, carrying over my vote
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 11:29 AM Aaron Radzinski
wrote:
> Hello all,
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client
> (incubating) version 0.7.5. Apache NLPCraft is a library for adding a
> natural language interface to any applicat
Hi,
+1 from me (binding, carrying over my vote).
I checked:
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- No unexpected binary files
- Checked PGP signatures
- Checked checksums
- Code compiles and tests successfully run
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 4:29 AM Aaron Radzinski
wrote:
>
Hello all,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client
(incubating) version 0.7.5. Apache NLPCraft is a library for adding a
natural language interface to any application.
The Apache NLPCraft community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache NLPCraft - Java Cl
19 matches
Mail list logo
