Hi everyone,
The 0.5.0-RC2 vote failed with -1 binding votes.
-1 votes (binding) and reasons:
Justin Mclean - unexpended binary in source release
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/33eed30795cc211791ec93a48786ee3f9d8c0961896b9e731476ee9b@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
We'll p
Justin,
2018-02-06 22:07 GMT+09:00 Justin Mclean :
> Hi,
>
>> Update the NOTICE file.
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hivemall/blob/v0.5.0/NOTICE
>
> Look there is obvious a disconnect here and you are not understanding what
> isand required in regard with licensing and ASF policy. That's
Hi,
> Update the NOTICE file.
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hivemall/blob/v0.5.0/NOTICE
Look there is obvious a disconnect here and you are not understanding what
isand required in regard with licensing and ASF policy. That's OK as
incubating project, it's hard to understand and hard t
Hi Justin,
2018-02-06 17:53 GMT+09:00 Justin Mclean :
> Hi,
>
>> To clear discussion, the missing license body is specifically for
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hivemall/blob/v0.5.0/LICENSE#L315
>
> Again please carefully read [1] to comply you need to include a pointer to
> the full tex
Hi,
Yep looks like you are including Font Awesome 4.6.3 not 5. [1] A good reason
to put the exact version of the 3rd party software somewhere so you know which
license applies.
Thanks,
Justin
1.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hivemall/blob/a31d0aab3f419812cae7da426f6dcdc9a7be72b5/src/si
Hi,
Sorry links got removed for some reason. Again please read [1] and check the
CC-BY license [2][, you may also want to read [3] re CC-BY which may be an
issue here. However it's not clear what version of font awesome you are
including the links provided refer to version 5 which is under slig
Hi,
> To clear discussion, the missing license body is specifically for
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hivemall/blob/v0.5.0/LICENSE#L315
Again please carefully read [1] to comply you need to include a pointer to the
full text of the license not a URL. If you need to download the license t
Hi Justin,
Thank you for your reply.
2018-02-06 16:12 GMT+09:00 Justin Mclean :
> Note the mix of public and private lists (as I’m replying to where it was
> sent).
CC'd private@ to notify discussion to our project mentors. Changed to dev@
> From a quick look:
> - In LICENSE you need to link t
Hi,
> I'm wondering how to fix the license headers of modified codes.
See points 3 to 5 of [1] so unless major changes have been made it best to keep
the original header and not add an ASF one. Points 1 and 2 are sort of
important as well :-)
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://www.apache.org/legal/src
Hi,
Note the mix of public and private lists (as I’m replying to where it was sent).
However I think this should be discussed on dev@hivemall not private@.
> I'm revising LICENSE and NOTICE files following your comments and [D].
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hivemall/blob/v0.5.0/LICE
2018-02-06 15:49 GMT+09:00 Makoto Yui :
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hivemall/blob/v0.5.0/LICENSE#L205
> (copyrights are removed from LICENSE)
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hivemall/blob/v0.5.0/NOTICE
Let me correct. LICENSE information is removed from NOTICE.
Makoto
--
Makoto
Hi Justin,
I'm revising LICENSE and NOTICE files following your comments and [D].
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hivemall/blob/v0.5.0/LICENSE#L205
(copyrights are removed from LICENSE)
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hivemall/blob/v0.5.0/NOTICE
Does it seem okey for you?
[D] says 'Copy
Hi,
>> IMO, adding license information along with copyrights in NOTICE sounds
>> reasonable because comparing LICENSE with NOTICE is hard when divided
>> while it may be redundant.
>
> In general only LICENSE should contain license information [1] as the NOTICE
> file is informational only [2], (
Hi,
> IMO, adding license information along with copyrights in NOTICE sounds
> reasonable because comparing LICENSE with NOTICE is hard when divided
> while it may be redundant.
In general only LICENSE should contain license information [1] as the NOTICE
file is informational only [2], (see d. "
On 30 January 2018 at 03:02, Makoto Yui wrote:
> Justin,
>
> 2018-01-30 11:33 GMT+09:00 Justin Mclean :
>> You should be careful following other TLPs as examples and follow the
>> instructions here. [1] If you want some good example that the HTTP project
>> or TomCat are I believe good ones to f
Justin,
2018-01-30 11:33 GMT+09:00 Justin Mclean :
> You should be careful following other TLPs as examples and follow the
> instructions here. [1] If you want some good example that the HTTP project or
> TomCat are I believe good ones to follow. That or perhaps more recently
> graduated projec
Hi,
> I used NOTICE file of Hadoop/Spark project as a reference.
You should be careful following other TLPs as examples and follow the
instructions here. [1] If you want some good example that the HTTP project or
TomCat are I believe good ones to follow. That or perhaps more recently
graduated
Hi Justin,
Thank you for a careful verification.
[1] is not used anymore and should be removed.
I'll discuss with PPMC members about LICENSE/NOTICE file format.
I'll add appendix to LICENSE file about other license headers.
I used NOTICE file of Hadoop/Spark project as a reference.
https://gith
Hi,
Sorry it -1 from me as there is compiled code in the sure release. [1]
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is missing several things including the licence appendix and licenses
of included software [2]
- NOTICE has some issues
- File hav
Hi all,
The Apache Hivemall community has approved a proposal to release
Apache Hivemall 0.5.0 (the first Apache release) by v0.5.0-RC2.
We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote
on this incubator release candidate.
The PPMC vote thread is located here:
https://www
20 matches
Mail list logo
