Hello Incubator Community,
Thanks for reviewing and voting for Apache DataLab (incubating) 2.5.1 release,
I am happy to announce the release voting has passed with 3 binding votes,
no +0 or -1 votes. Binding votes are from IPMC： Justin Mclean
Henry Saputra
Furkan KAMACI
Non-binding votes: +1 Cal
Hi,
+1 (binding)
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 8:22 PM Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Forward my VOTE from dev@ list :
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 8:20 AM Leonid Frolov wrote:
>
> > Hello Incubator Community,
> >
> > The Apache DataLab community has voted on and
Forward my VOTE from dev@ list :
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 8:20 AM Leonid Frolov wrote:
> Hello Incubator Community,
>
> The Apache DataLab community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release Apache DataLab (incubating) version 2.5.1. We now kindly request
> the Incubator PMC
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 1:18 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Some source code files are cherry picked from that 'mxparser' library and
> > redistributed, both in Source and Binary forms, as part of that 'stax'
> > library.
>
> Which may be fine it just depends on the license of each file
Hi,
> Some source code files are cherry picked from that 'mxparser' library and
> redistributed, both in Source and Binary forms, as part of that 'stax'
> library.
Which may be fine it just depends on the license of each file in question.
Knowing where they are originally from is nice but not al
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 11:02 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> > These Non-Generated Sources Files with the "Extreme! Lab, Indiana
> > University" license:
> > - com/bea/xml/stream/MXParser.java
>
> This is probably OK but that legal JIRA hasn’t been resolved.
>
This class is used here:
-
Hi.
> These Non-Generated Sources Files with the "Extreme! Lab, Indiana
> University" license:
> - com/bea/xml/stream/MXParser.java
This is probably OK but that legal JIRA hasn’t been resolved.
> These Non-Generated Sources Files have "Copyright (c) 2002 by BEA Systems.
> All Rights Reserved." i
Hi Justin,
Good catch!
Just out of interest, I went through the same Source Jar and I've found the
following and thought to bring it to the attention of this thread:
These Non-Generated Sources Files with the "Extreme! Lab, Indiana
University" license:
- com/bea/xml/stream/MXParser.java
These N
Hi:
Thanks for checking, change my vote to +1(non-binding)
Justin Mclean 于2022年1月13日周四 06:37写道：
> Hi,
>
> Looking at the source jar at [1] it contains the Apache 2.0 license and
> the non generated source files files have Apache headers so I think we can
> say this is OK.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Jus
Hi,
Looking at the source jar at [1] it contains the Apache 2.0 license and the non
generated source files files have Apache headers so I think we can say this is
OK.
Kind Regards,
Justin
1. https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/stax/stax/1.2.0/
---
This is the license of his dependencies, but his own license is not clear,
I am not sure how to deal with this situation, but I think it has certain
risks, let us listen to other people's ideas
Mohammad Noureldin 于2022年1月12日周三 22:18写道：
> Hi,
>
> I hope this helps. Found this [1], there it states
Hi,
I hope this helps. Found this [1], there it states that it has a Compile
Dependency (stax-api) with what it seems to be using Dual License:
- CDDL 1.0
- GPL
That said, I believe it is fair to assume that stax 1.2.0 follows one, or
both, of these 2 licenses.
[1] https://mvnrepository.com/arti
Hi,
This does not mean that the historical version he published is compliant.
Hans Van Akelyen 于2022年1月12日周三 20:07写道：
> I "think" it is ASF2 licensed [1]
>
> This location seems to be a copy from their original svn/cvs code.
>
> Cheers,
> Hans
>
> [1] https://github.com/codehaus/stax/blob/maste
I "think" it is ASF2 licensed [1]
This location seems to be a copy from their original svn/cvs code.
Cheers,
Hans
[1] https://github.com/codehaus/stax/blob/master/dev/ASF2.0.txt
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 12:52, Calvin Kirs wrote:
> Justin Mclean 于2022年1月12日周三 18:18写道：
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > st
Justin Mclean 于2022年1月12日周三 18:18写道：
>
> Hi,
>
> > stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is not used directly by DataLab but as a dependency
> of com.azure:azure-identity:jar:1.3.0:compile that has MIT license
>
hi, Justin, that's what I'm worried about, stax: stax this version does
not have a relevant license, a
Hi,
> stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is not used directly by DataLab but as a dependency of
> com.azure:azure-identity:jar:1.3.0:compile that has MIT license
The license of stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is what is relevant here, just because it is
a dependancy of a MIT licensed jar doesn’t make it acceptable. Do
Hi,
stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is not used directly by DataLab but as a dependency of
com.azure:azure-identity:jar:1.3.0:compile that has MIT license
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.azure/azure-identity/1.3.0
Which is acceptable according to
https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a
Dear Zhang,
Thank you for the reminder, we have changed the year in develop branch.
Best regards,
Leonid Frolov
On 2022/01/07 07:51:39 Zhang Yonglun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (non binding)
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - signatures and hashes are fine
> - Disclaimer exists
> - LICENSE and N
Hi,
+1 (non binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine
- Disclaimer exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE exist
- No unexpected binary files
Kindly reminder that maybe you would like to update the year in the NOTICE
file before the next release.
--
Zhang Yonglun
Apache She
Hi,
+0 (nonbinding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are correct
Need to update the NOTICE year in the next version
- No unexpected binary files
- all source files have ASF headers
- stax:stax:jar:1.2.0
I did not find its
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are correct
- No unexpected binary files
- all source files have ASF headers
- can compile from source
Kind Regards,
Justin
Hi Леонід Фролов,
Hope this helps.
> For the reasons why, please review recent threads on this mailing list.
This is a previous context [1] for your reference.
> Please re-issue the vote with the correct URL
I think we can simply start the 2nd round vote with the correct KEYS URL,
and don't ha
Hello Incubator Community,
The Apache DataLab community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache DataLab (incubating) version 2.5.1. We now kindly request the Incubator
PMC members review and vote in this release.
DataLab is a platform for creating self-service, exploratory data
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 09:37, Леонід Фролов wrote:
>
> Hello Incubator Community, The Apache DataLab community has voted on and
> approved a proposal to release Apache DataLab (incubating) version 2.5.1.
> We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote in this
> release. DataLab i
Hello Incubator Community, The Apache DataLab community has voted on and
approved a proposal to release Apache DataLab (incubating) version 2.5.1.
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote in this
release. DataLab is a platform for creating self-service, exploratory data
scien
25 matches
Mail list logo
