Hi, This does not mean that the historical version he published is compliant.
Hans Van Akelyen <hans.van.akel...@gmail.com> 于2022年1月12日周三 20:07写道： > I "think" it is ASF2 licensed [1] > > This location seems to be a copy from their original svn/cvs code. > > Cheers, > Hans > > [1] https://github.com/codehaus/stax/blob/master/dev/ASF2.0.txt > > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 12:52, Calvin Kirs <k...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> 于2022年1月12日周三 18:18写道： > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is not used directly by DataLab but as a > dependency > > > of com.azure:azure-identity:jar:1.3.0:compile that has MIT license > > > > > hi, Justin, that's what I'm worried about, stax: stax this version does > > not have a relevant license, although it is used by many projects. > > > > > > > > The license of stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is what is relevant here, just > because > > > it is a dependancy of a MIT licensed jar doesn’t make it acceptable. Do > > we > > > know how is it licensed? If it category A/B that fine, if it category X > > > that would be an issue. > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > Justin > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best wishes！ > > CalvinKirs > > > -- Best wishes！ CalvinKirs
