Re: How to denote unusual copyright circumstances, was Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-10-06 Thread Jim Apple
Thanks, Stian - I'll fix this squeasel notification issue in LICENSE. I'll talk to the Impala community about whether this is "important enough" or "just an innocent embedded dependency". On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > On 4 October 2016 at 20:21, Henry Robinson wro

Re: How to denote unusual copyright circumstances, was Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-10-06 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
On 4 October 2016 at 20:21, Henry Robinson wrote: >> > After further consideration, I have a patch in flight to fix that. It >> > is a compiled source file. >> > >> > However, my question was intended to be broader. As Henry notes, there >> > are some files that are Copyright Cloudera that were no

[RESULT] [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-10-04 Thread Jim Apple
The vote passes with: +1's (all binding) Carl Steinbach Justin Mclean Tom White (one of Impala's mentors, see the PPMC vote thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-impala-dev/201609.mbox/%3ccaf-wd4sf4wrnjn6mjjfj7t07feuwe-kamdrmjmava1jg5-w...@mail.gmail.com%3E or https://lists

Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-10-04 Thread Carl Steinbach
+1 (binding) to the release On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Jim Apple wrote: > Hi Carl - is this a +1 to the release or to Tom's note about > Strata/Hadoop World? > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Carl Steinbach wrote: > > +1 > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:

Re: How to denote unusual copyright circumstances, was Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-10-04 Thread Henry Robinson
On 4 October 2016 at 11:04, John D. Ament wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:58 PM Jim Apple wrote: > > > After further consideration, I have a patch in flight to fix that. It > > is a compiled source file. > > > > However, my question was intended to be broader. As Henry notes, there > > are som

Re: How to denote unusual copyright circumstances, was Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-10-04 Thread John D. Ament
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:58 PM Jim Apple wrote: > After further consideration, I have a patch in flight to fix that. It > is a compiled source file. > > However, my question was intended to be broader. As Henry notes, there > are some files that are Copyright Cloudera that were not part of the >

Re: How to denote unusual copyright circumstances, was Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-10-04 Thread Jim Apple
After further consideration, I have a patch in flight to fix that. It is a compiled source file. However, my question was intended to be broader. As Henry notes, there are some files that are Copyright Cloudera that were not part of the SGA. How shall we annotate those to let future IPMC release v

Re: How to denote unusual copyright circumstances, was Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-30 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > This (an another couple of things in your review) might stay the same > in the next release, but be allowed (as I read it) under the licensing > rules. As long as it not compile source files it should be fine. It's not not binary files i.e. jpg and pngs and the like are ok. What does conta

Re: How to denote unusual copyright circumstances, was Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-30 Thread Henry Robinson
On 30 September 2016 at 11:39, Jim Apple wrote: > Thank you for the review, Justin. I have changed the subject so as not > to clutter the VOTE thread. > > > - One possible binary file that shouldn’t be in the source release? [15] > (not sure what this is) > > This (an another couple of things in

How to denote unusual copyright circumstances, was Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-30 Thread Jim Apple
Thank you for the review, Justin. I have changed the subject so as not to clutter the VOTE thread. > - One possible binary file that shouldn’t be in the source release? [15] (not > sure what this is) This (an another couple of things in your review) might stay the same in the next release, but b

Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-30 Thread Jim Apple
Hi Carl - is this a +1 to the release or to Tom's note about Strata/Hadoop World? On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Carl Steinbach wrote: > +1 > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> Hey Jim, >> >> Just a quick note: I think several of the mentors (myself included) might >>

Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-29 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The git tag: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.7.0-rc3 Also please include the git hash in the VOTE email. Git tags change be changed. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-m

Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-29 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 binding (only just). There are several minor issue please fix for next release. Please place build instruction and supported platforms in the README. The wiki may change over time and that may make it difficult to build older versions. I checked: - name contains incubating - signatures

Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-29 Thread Carl Steinbach
+1 On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hey Jim, > > Just a quick note: I think several of the mentors (myself included) might > be busy at Strata/Hadoop World this week, so might be tough to get the > votes in within 72 hours. If the required 3 votes aren't in by early next >

Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-29 Thread Todd Lipcon
Hey Jim, Just a quick note: I think several of the mentors (myself included) might be busy at Strata/Hadoop World this week, so might be tough to get the votes in within 72 hours. If the required 3 votes aren't in by early next week, I should have more time to check the release then. Thanks -Todd

Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-27 Thread Jim Apple
Oh, I forgot to mention - to check the RAT report, you can use the script in bin/check-rat-report.py and the list of files to exclude from bin/rat_exclude_files.txt On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Jim Apple wrote: > The Impala PPMC has voted to release 2.7.0 release candidate 3: > > Proposal: >

[VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

2016-09-27 Thread Jim Apple
The Impala PPMC has voted to release 2.7.0 release candidate 3: Proposal: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-impala-dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAC-pSX36EbVohLNXdg7pV7i3gkv5_JajZ8ekbZM9OguOi9fH0Q%40mail.gmail.com%3E Mirror: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/530925a9689157059d6de31a4e3