On 4 October 2016 at 11:04, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:58 PM Jim Apple <jbap...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > After further consideration, I have a patch in flight to fix that. It > > is a compiled source file. > > > > However, my question was intended to be broader. As Henry notes, there > > are some files that are Copyright Cloudera that were not part of the > > SGA. How shall we annotate those to let future IPMC release voters > > understand that the files are intentionally annotated the way they > > are? > > > > Is Cloudera willing to donate them? > Perhaps - but these files belong to their own, separate projects, distinct from Apache Impala, but are a bit too small to support a community and therefore aren't good candidates for incubation. Isn't the right way to address this to make a note in LICENSE.txt? That's what we do for compatibly-licensed files which have a non-ASF copyright holder. > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com > > > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > >> This (an another couple of things in your review) might stay the same > > >> in the next release, but be allowed (as I read it) under the licensing > > >> rules. > > > > > > As long as it not compile source files it should be fine. It's not not > > binary files i.e. jpg and pngs and the like are ok. What does contain the > > file? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Justin > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
