Thanks Hendrik for your hard work on the project and for dealing with the
graduation process.
Le jeu 7 avr. 2016 22:35, Hendrik Dev a écrit :
> I think we reached consensus, so let me close this vote and report the
> (formal) result:
>
> There are 11 +1 votes (more than 5 of them binding), no 0
Awesome. My +1 as well.
Thanks for the feedback.
Jean-Louis
Le jeu 7 avr. 2016 17:27, Ted Dunning a écrit :
> I say let it go.
>
> My own guess is that unless there is a strong recruitment effort it will
> soon become unreleasable, but, as Roman points out, there are mechanisms to
> deal with t
I think we reached consensus, so let me close this vote and report the
(formal) result:
There are 11 +1 votes (more than 5 of them binding), no 0 and no -1
votes (one was withdrawn)
So this vote passed, we will submit the resolution to the board.
Thanks to all who cast their vote and thanks als
I say let it go.
My own guess is that unless there is a strong recruitment effort it will
soon become unreleasable, but, as Roman points out, there are mechanisms to
deal with that.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:17 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> So what do we have to do to draw this vote to a resoluti
So what do we have to do to draw this vote to a resolution? It seems that
the general consensus is positive to graduate, but there's some concerns
over the size of the podling. It satisfies the minimum practical TLP.
John
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:14 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7,
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> The strict limit is 3. The practical limit is probably more like 5.
Like I said: FWIW I see no problem with a project with a PMC count of
3 active members. We have board reports for a reason (should that active
bit ever become a problem).
Than
The strict limit is 3. The practical limit is probably more like 5.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Mark Struberg
> wrote:
> > We again got a few contributions in the last days, so I really think we
> will do fine and add committers
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Mark Struberg
wrote:
> We again got a few contributions in the last days, so I really think we will
> do fine and add committers soon.
FWIW: I'm honestly very relaxed about the # of committers. All the project
has to have is an active PMC of at least 3. That's th
We again got a few contributions in the last days, so I really think we will do
fine and add committers soon.
LieGrue,
strub
> On Thursday, 7 April 2016, 4:03, John D. Ament wrote:
> > It seems that the general consensus is a +1.
> Is there anyone who has a strong feeling that Johnzon shou
It seems that the general consensus is a +1.
Is there anyone who has a strong feeling that Johnzon shouldn't graduate?
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:42 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> +1 from my side. Small projects are ok.
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
> wrote:
> > +1 fr
+1 from my side. Small projects are ok.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> ++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Chief Architect
> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
> NAS
+1 for graduation (binding)
I don’t see any value in keeping Johnzon in incubation.
The project seems to be ticking along, with several releases, frequent commits,
and a low excitement but active community.
Craig
> On Apr 1, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote:
>
> The Apache Johnzon commu
+1 from me.
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
+1
I'd like to further elaborate why we did not choose to graduate under Geronimo
or TomEE.
* TomEE: Johnzon is not only bound to a JavaEE container but could really be
used separately, e.g. in CXF. It would be kind of weird if we need to do a
Johnzon release in TomEE first, then build CXF to
I agree with Justin, there is no real benefit (either for the podling
nor for apache/incubator) when Johnzon stays in the Incubator.
We have an active, friendly, diverse and responsive community, we had
regular releases, we promote Johnzon [1] and Jira tickets are
typically closed a few days after
Good morning!
Of course Johnzon could be bigger.
And as said before: there are 3 active committers (not 2!) and an active PMC.
Plus there are at least 2 further people who contributed patches and are on our
watch-list.
I also believe that we are a really friendly community :)
That said I have
Hi,
I agree the project doesn’t have a large visible active community but I’m also
not sure what the point of having Johnzon staying in the incubator. They tick
along nicely, they certainly don’t need the incubator to check their releases
and they understand the Apache Way of doing things. What
Le 5 avr. 2016 05:16, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
>
> I have to agree with Ted's synopsis. After reviewing the podling's
> proposal compared to current date, it seems that there's actually been a
> dramatic decrease in committers since inception. I didn't realize that
> when originally looking.
>
I have to agree with Ted's synopsis. After reviewing the podling's
proposal compared to current date, it seems that there's actually been a
dramatic decrease in committers since inception. I didn't realize that
when originally looking.
I do however want to clarify - I think Johnzon is mature. T
My suggestion would be to work on building community first.
Not pulling in new committers and PMC members is evidence of a serious
community bug. It could be lack of marketing, unfriendly natives,
cliquishness or an idea that just doesn't have legs. Probably it is
something I didn't think of.
In
So, what are the next steps?
Do we have to postpone the graduation and try to bring up more contributors
before?
Or do we want to still graduate and work out the community growth after?
Jean-Louis
Le lun. 4 avr. 2016 à 02:50, Niall Pemberton a
écrit :
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 11:54 PM, John
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 11:54 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Niali,
>
> I don't disagree with your assessment. In actuality, Johnzon has only
> added one committer in its 22 months in the incubator, who later joined
> their PPMC and is now slated to be their VP. However, adding committers
> isn't th
Niali,
I don't disagree with your assessment. In actuality, Johnzon has only
added one committer in its 22 months in the incubator, who later joined
their PPMC and is now slated to be their VP. However, adding committers
isn't the only form of community growth we expect to see when graduating.
J
Le 3 avr. 2016 23:58, "Niall Pemberton" a
écrit :
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Mark Struberg
> wrote:
>
> > Please look at more current data
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-johnzon/graphs/contributors
>
>
> I didn't see your commits today - but otherwise doesn't look alot
> dif
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Mark Struberg
wrote:
> Please look at more current data
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-johnzon/graphs/contributors
I didn't see your commits today - but otherwise doesn't look alot
difference.
Also note that there are patches applied from contributors v
Please look at more current data
https://github.com/apache/incubator-johnzon/graphs/contributors
Also note that there are patches applied from contributors via Jira patches and
NOT via git-pull. Thus they show not up in the graph above.
>From that category we have Reinhard Sandtner (apacheId rs
Johnzon reports for June, Sept & Dec 2015 all listed "adding new
committers/pmc members" in the "most important issues to address in the
move towards graduation" - but in that time there were no changes to the
community. So what changed to make the ppmc/mentors now think the project
is ready to gra
+1 (binding)
LieGrue,
strub
> On Saturday, 2 April 2016, 19:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 04/01/2016 09:49 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote:
>> The Apache Johnzon community has discussed and voted on graduation to
>> a top level project. The vote passed
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 04/01/2016 09:49 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote:
The Apache Johnzon community has discussed and voted on graduation to
a top level project. The vote passed with 8 +1 votes (5 from the PPMC)
and no 0 or -1 votes.
Incubation Status:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/johnzon.
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
wrote:
> +1 non-binding
> On 1 Apr 2016 20:49, "Hendrik Dev" wrote:
>
> > The Apache Johnzon community has discussed and voted on graduation to
> > a top level project. The vote passed with 8 +1 votes (5 from the PPMC)
> > and no
+1 non-binding
On 1 Apr 2016 20:49, "Hendrik Dev" wrote:
> The Apache Johnzon community has discussed and voted on graduation to
> a top level project. The vote passed with 8 +1 votes (5 from the PPMC)
> and no 0 or -1 votes.
>
> Incubation Status:
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/johnzon.h
+1
Thks
Amol
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:10 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 3:49 PM Hendrik Dev wrote:
>
> > The Apache Johnzon community has discussed and voted on graduation to
> > a top level project. The vote passed with 8 +1 votes (5 from the PPMC)
> > and no 0 or -
+1
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 3:49 PM Hendrik Dev wrote:
> The Apache Johnzon community has discussed and voted on graduation to
> a top level project. The vote passed with 8 +1 votes (5 from the PPMC)
> and no 0 or -1 votes.
>
> Incubation Status:
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/johnzon.html
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
Le 1 avr. 2016 21:49, "Hendrik Dev" a écrit :
> The Apache Johnzon community has discussed and voted on graduation to
> a top level project. The vote passed with 8 +1 votes (5 from the PPMC)
> and no 0 or -1 votes.
>
> Incubation Status:
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/johnzon.html
> Ma
The Apache Johnzon community has discussed and voted on graduation to
a top level project. The vote passed with 8 +1 votes (5 from the PPMC)
and no 0 or -1 votes.
Incubation Status:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/johnzon.html
Maturity Assessment:
https://s.apache.org/d88S
Discussions:
https:
36 matches
Mail list logo
