Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating

2007-03-05 Thread Daniel Kulp
Adam, On Monday 05 March 2007 13:27, Adam Lally wrote: > Is it sufficient for 3 and 4 to add this information only to our > top-level "uimaj" pom, which is the parent of our other poms? And is > this correct information to add: > > > The Apache Softwar

Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating

2007-03-05 Thread Adam Lally
On 2/25/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A quick look reveals: 1) The jars don't have the incubator disclaimer in them. (this is the critical one) 2) The for jVinci doesn't have "Apache UIMA" in it. 3) The poms don't have a licenses section 4) The tag doesn't have a url to apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating

2007-03-05 Thread Marshall Schor
Thanks for your careful review, Jean, much appreciated. We'll fix these issues and retry :-) My understanding is that the Status page needs to be updated by an ASF member - we're working with our Mentors to get this done. If anyone else has comments / issues, please let us know so we can fix

Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating

2007-03-04 Thread Jean T. Anderson
Adam Lally wrote: > The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version > 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to > approve this release. > > Release artifacts: > http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/ > ... I reviewed the uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-src.ta

Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating

2007-02-28 Thread Marshall Schor
Dear Incubator community, Thanks to Dan Kulp, we have a +1 vote to release so far. We need of course 3 binding +1 votes to release; could some other folks please take a look at this? Thanks for your time and efforts in doing this - we really appreciate it! -Marshall Schor Adam Lally wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating

2007-02-27 Thread Marshall Schor
Just to be clear, we plan to fix the issues Dan raised in the next release, which is not yet scheduled, but will be sometime in the future. We ask that the Incubator PMC members review this, the current release candidate, and look forward to your feedback and votes. -Marshall Schor Thilo Goe

Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating

2007-02-27 Thread Adam Lally
On 2/25/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A quick look through this looks OK to me for the src and bin distributions. HOWEVER, I notice you are using Maven for builds. Is UIMA planning on releasing the 2.1.0-incubating artifacts to the maven repository so other maven based projects c

Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating

2007-02-27 Thread Thilo Goetz
Daniel Kulp wrote: On Friday 23 February 2007 16:39, Adam Lally wrote: The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to approve this release. Release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/ A qui

Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating

2007-02-25 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Friday 23 February 2007 16:39, Adam Lally wrote: > The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version > 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to > approve this release. > > Release artifacts: > http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/ A quick look thro

[VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating

2007-02-24 Thread Adam Lally
The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to approve this release. Release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/ The release was signed by Thilo Goetz, our release manager. His public key is