Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click - third try

2009-02-18 Thread Andrus Adamchik
+1 On Feb 10, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Bob Schellink wrote: New snapshots are available with the following changes: # build.properties has new property to switch off the hibernate dependency # build.xml will only build the hibernate package if hibernate is available on the build path # The Co

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click - third try

2009-02-15 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
Sorry, took me a while. Builds fine with JDK 1.6 under Linux i386 using ant 1.7.1 rat report looks fine. +1 Ciao Henning On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 01:02 +0200, Bob Schellink wrote: > New snapshots are available with the following changes: > > # build.properties has new

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click - third try

2009-02-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Bob Schellink wrote: > Will Glass-Husain wrote: >> >> +1 > > Quick question, does the PMC votes from previous release attempts (the > first and second try) count towards this cut? In other words does Andrus > and Kevan's votes from the previous attempt count? Each package must be evaluated on it'

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click - third try

2009-02-15 Thread Bob Schellink
Will Glass-Husain wrote: +1 Quick question, does the PMC votes from previous release attempts (the first and second try) count towards this cut? In other words does Andrus and Kevan's votes from the previous attempt count? Thanks bob -

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click - third try

2009-02-15 Thread Bob Schellink
Hi Will, Will Glass-Husain wrote: * took me a few to figure out I needed to do "ant get-deps" then "ant test-all". Would have been nice for this to be noted in the readme. (I didn't see anything else with specific "how to build" instructions). There is a building.html document available und

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click - third try

2009-02-14 Thread Will Glass-Husain
Hi, +1 built with JDK 1.6, Win XP, ant 1.7, browsed the docs and some of the source. Looks great! Two quick side notes * took me a few to figure out I needed to do "ant get-deps" then "ant test-all". Would have been nice for this to be noted in the readme. (I didn't see anything else with spec

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

2009-02-11 Thread Craig L Russell
On Feb 10, 2009, at 11:13 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: On Feb 11, 2009, at 1:00 AM, Bob Schellink wrote: Can we get fired for trying to release so many times? Hehe , no :-) From what I've seen, two tries is exceptionally good, four is average for a first release from the incubator. Cra

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

2009-02-10 Thread Andrus Adamchik
On Feb 11, 2009, at 1:00 AM, Bob Schellink wrote: Can we get fired for trying to release so many times? Hehe , no :-) Thanks Henning for catching those things. Andrus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubato

[VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click - third try

2009-02-10 Thread Bob Schellink
New snapshots are available with the following changes: # build.properties has new property to switch off the hibernate dependency # build.xml will only build the hibernate package if hibernate is available on the build path # The ConcurrentReaderHashMap source has been removed from the dist

Re: Fwd: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

2009-02-10 Thread Bob Schellink
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: You are definitely in a grey area with the ConcurrentReaderHashMap; Ouch you're right. According to [1] we cannot distribute that particular source file of Doug Lea's work. We can however include the binary form and treat is a Category B license. I'll fix these

Re: Fwd: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

2009-02-09 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
is is a +0, not a +1. Ciao Henning On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 08:35 +1100, Malcolm Edgar wrote: > fyi :) > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Andrus Adamchik > Date: Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:49 AM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 relea

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

2009-02-09 Thread Andrus Adamchik
Anybody else from the Incubator PMC can check the release? Henning? Will? Thanks, Andrus On Feb 3, 2009, at 10:10 PM, Bob Schellink wrote: Hi all, The Click community has approved the first release of Apache Click. All IP issues have been resolved and incompatible license dependencies rep

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

2009-02-05 Thread Andrus Adamchik
+1. On Feb 4, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Bob Schellink wrote: New snapshots are available and contains the incubation disclaimer. Thanks to Kevan for picking this up. The disclaimer can be found in the distribution root while for maven artifacts the disclaimer can be found under META-INF. New dist

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

2009-02-04 Thread Martin Cooper
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On Feb 4, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Bob Schellink wrote: > > New snapshots are available and contains the incubation disclaimer. >> >> Thanks to Kevan for picking this up. >> >> The disclaimer can be found in the distribution root while for maven

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

2009-02-04 Thread Kevan Miller
On Feb 4, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Bob Schellink wrote: New snapshots are available and contains the incubation disclaimer. Thanks to Kevan for picking this up. The disclaimer can be found in the distribution root while for maven artifacts the disclaimer can be found under META-INF. New distrib

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

2009-02-04 Thread Bob Schellink
New snapshots are available and contains the incubation disclaimer. Thanks to Kevan for picking this up. The disclaimer can be found in the distribution root while for maven artifacts the disclaimer can be found under META-INF. New distribution is available here: http://people.apache.org/~sa

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

2009-02-04 Thread Kevan Miller
On Feb 4, 2009, at 12:23 AM, Bob Schellink wrote: Kevan Miller wrote: Perhaps I missed it, but I don't see an incubator DISCLAIMER as required by http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html Thanks Kevan you're right, will fix and republish. Have you run RAT against your sou

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

2009-02-03 Thread Bob Schellink
Kevan Miller wrote: Perhaps I missed it, but I don't see an incubator DISCLAIMER as required by http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html Thanks Kevan you're right, will fix and republish. Have you run RAT against your source? Some files don't have Apache source license he

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

2009-02-03 Thread Kevan Miller
Perhaps I missed it, but I don't see an incubator DISCLAIMER as required by http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html Have you run RAT against your source? Some files don't have Apache source license headers and looks like they should (e.g. examples/src/ cayenne.xml, etc).

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

2009-02-03 Thread Andrus Adamchik
The vote quoted below is an internal vote inside the project PPMC - a prerequisite for the gene...@i.a.o vote, which was started now. You are absolutely right about 3 Incubator PMC votes requirement for the vote in THIS thread tho. Andrus On Feb 3, 2009, at 10:47 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrot

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

2009-02-03 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Just a point of order: I think you have just one binding vote (only Incubator PMC members' votes are binding): Andrus Adamchik's vote. You'll need at least 2 more to let the vote pass. Martijn On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bob Schellink wrote: > Hi all, > > The Click community has approved th

[VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

2009-02-03 Thread Bob Schellink
Hi all, The Click community has approved the first release of Apache Click. All IP issues have been resolved and incompatible license dependencies replaced. We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this release. The vote on the click-dev mailing list resulted in 5