On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:50 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Hirsch, Richard
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That is a coincidence - I was looking at james last night (
> http://twitter.com/rhirsch/status/1032899174) in terms of a bridge for
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Darren Hague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaron (or other Mentors) - I could use your help in determining which are
> "binding" votes,
http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html (though it's often a little outdated)
> and what to do next...
i usually total the
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Hirsch, Richard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is a coincidence - I was looking at james last night
> (http://twitter.com/rhirsch/status/1032899174) in terms of a bridge for ESME.
> I liked the idea of mailets
> and was looking into the possibility of using one
J Aaron Farr wrote:
On Wed 26 Nov 2008 11:10, Darren Hague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Aaron,
Are we ready for the next steps of accepting ESME into the Incubator?
The Apache Incubator general mailing list seems to have been quiet
since Saturday 21st November, so I'm not sure if there's
] Accept ESME into the Apache Incubator
i'm +1 with comments (see below)
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 27, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 26 November 2008 3:49:09 pm Craig L Russell wrote:
&
i'm +1 with comments (see below)
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 27, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 26 November 2008 3:49:09 pm Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>
>>> Apologies. My inbox never received the messages with the att
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:17:33AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Darren Hague wrote:
> > Hi Aaron,
> >
> > Are we ready for the next steps of accepting ESME into the Incubator?
> >
> > The Apache Incubator general mailing list seems to have been quiet since
> > Saturday 21st November, so
On Nov 27, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 3:49:09 pm Craig L Russell wrote:
Apologies. My inbox never received the messages with the attachment.
My only concern is that from the description, the project appears to
be run in real time, with decisions made "t
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 3:49:09 pm Craig L Russell wrote:
> Apologies. My inbox never received the messages with the attachment.
>
> My only concern is that from the description, the project appears to
> be run in real time, with decisions made "through collaborative
> decision-making on the
Thanks both - this is good feedback. We have been moving more traffic to
our esme-dev list, but you are right to point out the need to document
the results of any significant real-time discussions back on the mailing
list.
To be honest, thus far we have been making up the whole process as we g
Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> My only concern is that from the description, the project appears to be
> run in real time, with decisions made "through collaborative
> decision-making on the mailing list, through daily scrum calls, via
> Twitter and using open discussion on ESME itself."
Good points.
Apologies. My inbox never received the messages with the attachment.
My only concern is that from the description, the project appears to
be run in real time, with decisions made "through collaborative
decision-making on the mailing list, through daily scrum calls, via
Twitter and using ope
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Point of order.
>
> The proposal that we're supposed to vote on was never attached to the [VOTE]
> email, as pointed out by Bertrand on 17-Nov, and me on 21-Nov.
>
> Makes me wonder if anyone is reading the comments.
>
Point of order.
The proposal that we're supposed to vote on was never attached to the
[VOTE] email, as pointed out by Bertrand on 17-Nov, and me on 21-Nov.
Makes me wonder if anyone is reading the comments.
Craig
On Nov 26, 2008, at 9:17 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
On Wed 26 Nov 2008 11:10, D
On Wed 26 Nov 2008 11:10, Darren Hague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Are we ready for the next steps of accepting ESME into the Incubator?
>
> The Apache Incubator general mailing list seems to have been quiet
> since Saturday 21st November, so I'm not sure if there's a problem
> wit
Darren Hague wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Are we ready for the next steps of accepting ESME into the Incubator?
>
> The Apache Incubator general mailing list seems to have been quiet since
> Saturday 21st November, so I'm not sure if there's a problem with the
> mailserver somewhere or if people are
Hi Aaron,
Are we ready for the next steps of accepting ESME into the Incubator?
The Apache Incubator general mailing list seems to have been quiet since
Saturday 21st November, so I'm not sure if there's a problem with the
mailserver somewhere or if people are just getting ready for Thanksgivi
Hi Craig,
I did this already, on 17th November.
Best regards,
Darren
Craig L Russell wrote:
Could you please copy the proposal from
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ESMEProposal here in this thread? As
that wiki page might change later, this helps documenting what we
voted on.
Seconded. I'm
On Nov 17, 2008, at 6:17 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Darren Hague
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...I think that now is the right time for a vote, so please vote +1
to accept
ESME into the Apache Incubator
Looks good.
, or -1 (with comments) if you think
Darren Hague wrote:
I think that now is the right time for a vote, so please vote +1 to
accept ESME into the Apache Incubator, or -1 (with comments) if you
think ESME should not be in the Apache Incubator in its present form.
+1
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez - http://bluxte.net
---
+1 from me.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:43 AM, J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun 16 Nov 2008 14:12, Darren Hague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Having proposed ESME for inclusion in the Apache Incubator two weeks
>> ago (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ESMEProposal), comments have
On Sun 16 Nov 2008 14:12, Darren Hague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having proposed ESME for inclusion in the Apache Incubator two weeks
> ago (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ESMEProposal), comments have now
> died down.
>
> The feedback we have had has been constructive and positive, we have a
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Darren Hague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...I think that now is the right time for a vote, so please vote +1 to accept
ESME into the Apache Incubator, or -1 (with comments) if you think ESME
should not be in the Apache Incubator in it
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Darren Hague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I think that now is the right time for a vote, so please vote +1 to accept
> ESME into the Apache Incubator, or -1 (with comments) if you think ESME
> should not be in the Apache Incubator in its present form
Could y
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Darren Hague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...please vote +1 to accept
> ESME into the Apache Incubator,...
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mai
+1
Dan
On Sunday 16 November 2008 2:12:11 pm Darren Hague wrote:
> Having proposed ESME for inclusion in the Apache Incubator two weeks ago
> (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ESMEProposal), comments have now died
> down.
>
> The feedback we have had has been constructive and positive, we have
Darren Hague wrote:
Having proposed ESME for inclusion in the Apache Incubator two weeks
ago (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ESMEProposal), comments have now
died down.
The feedback we have had has been constructive and positive, we have a
Champion in J. Aaron Farr, and five mentors have si
Having proposed ESME for inclusion in the Apache Incubator two weeks ago
(http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ESMEProposal), comments have now died
down.
The feedback we have had has been constructive and positive, we have a
Champion in J. Aaron Farr, and five mentors have signed up:
+ J. Aaron
28 matches
Mail list logo
