Craig L Russell wrote: > > My only concern is that from the description, the project appears to be > run in real time, with decisions made "through collaborative > decision-making on the mailing list, through daily scrum calls, via > Twitter and using open discussion on ESME itself."
Good points. If the project remembers one cardinal rule --- "If it didn't happen on the dev@ list, it didn't happen", then all of these additional tools can certainly be used to advance the project. They simply aren't decision-making mechanisms, and are not valid as some ordinal reference to "but we decided that..." For example, httpd and apr use IRC to suppliment but never to replace the dev@ developer forums. Once an idea is hashed out, if it needs to be presented to the developers, dev@ is the ***one and only*** forum. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
