Re: [VOTE] [FINERACT] 0.1.0.incubating for release

2016-04-14 Thread Alex Harui
On 4/14/16, 12:49 AM, "Adi Raju" wrote: >We cannot even depend on cat-x licensed libraries? IMO, it depends on what you mean by "depend". There are some exceptions discussed here [1] HTH, -Alex [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html -

[CANCEL] [VOTE] [FINERACT] 0.1.0.incubating for release

2016-04-14 Thread John D. Ament
gt; > > > Regards, > > Adi > > > > > > -Original Message----- > > From: Markus Geiß [mailto:markus.ge...@live.de] > > Sent: 12 April 2016 10:08 > > To: d...@fineract.incubator.apache.org > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] [FINERACT] 0.1.0.incubat

Re: [VOTE] [FINERACT] 0.1.0.incubating for release

2016-04-14 Thread Myrle Krantz
: Adi Raju [mailto:adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com] > Sent: 12 April 2016 10:35 > To: d...@fineract.incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] [FINERACT] 0.1.0.incubating for release > > Release files correspond to the following fineract source branch > https://github.com/apach

Re: [VOTE] [FINERACT] 0.1.0.incubating for release

2016-04-14 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Since we are intending to make source only release and not include any jar > or compiled binaries. Part of the issue here is your current LICENSE/NOTICE lists dependancies not just what is bundled in the release. You only need to list what is bundled. > In such case, we wouldn't have anyt

RE: [VOTE] [FINERACT] 0.1.0.incubating for release

2016-04-14 Thread Adi Raju
but maybe we are wrong here. Best, Markus .::YAGNI likes a DRY KISS::. > Subject: Re: [VOTE] [FINERACT] 0.1.0.incubating for release > From: jus...@classsoftware.com > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:42:09 +1000 > To: general@incubator.apache.

RE: [VOTE] [FINERACT] 0.1.0.incubating for release

2016-04-13 Thread Markus Geiß
. Best, Markus .::YAGNI likes a DRY KISS::. > Subject: Re: [VOTE] [FINERACT] 0.1.0.incubating for release > From: jus...@classsoftware.com > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:42:09 +1000 > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Hi, > > Littl

Re: [VOTE] [FINERACT] 0.1.0.incubating for release

2016-04-13 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Little confusing if this is a call to vote on the incubator or not but either way this may help. If it is an incubator vote I’d vote -1 (binding) due to LICENSE/NOTICE issues and possible inclusion of Category B/Category X licensed software in a release. I checked: - Signature and hashes

RE: [VOTE] [FINERACT] 0.1.0.incubating for release

2016-04-12 Thread Adi Raju
Adding general@incubator.apache.org into mailing list -Original Message- From: Adi Raju [mailto:adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com] Sent: 12 April 2016 10:35 To: d...@fineract.incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] [FINERACT] 0.1.0.incubating for release Release files correspond to the