Gregory, there are great tools out there for the analysis of IoT data and we
don’t want to duplicate those efforts in iota. Rather we want to make sure iota
is fully capable of interacting with tools like Hadoop, Storm, and Flink in
those cases where the their is enough data to warrant the use o
Greg, a number of examples have been used - including a data center - but there
is no intention of focusing iota on data centers. As I mentioned below IoT is a
continuum that encompasses many use cases. iota is all about
endpoints/sensors/etc. capturing endpoints moving them (securely if needed)
So then I might suggest refining the positioning.
When I see "an enterprise IoT platform" I'm thinking of backend systems and
analysis, not end point embedded systems or devices beyond the node.
A Nest thermostat is a device, but the backend analysis and smart cloud app
that centralizes the servi
Well aware of all that. Just kind of amazed that the data center is the
focal point of this thread. That's a solved problem, rather than the IoT
endpoints/sensors/etc. It seems the hard problem is lifting data from your
embedded microcontroller, into a data packet sent via TCP/IP to $somewhere.
In
Greg, think of this as a continuum some IoT use cases are simple ( a few
sensors) others might be at an industrial scale (data centers with 100,000s of
sensors). In between there are many other use cases. The data store needed at
different points of the continuum will be different. iota is meant
Seriously? IoT can simply mean a temperature sensor in your house. No need
for a database, let alone something like Hadoop. ... that's just
over-engineering.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Gregory Chase wrote:
> I'd recommend a PostgreSQL adaptor, which opens a huge new world.
>
> Of course, i
Hadrian, thanks for making the change - starting the voting process would be
wonderful.
Thanks
-Tony
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> I did rename the proposal page to IotaProposal [1].
> Looks like there is enough interest and a lot of positive feedback t
Hi Tony,
I did rename the proposal page to IotaProposal [1].
Looks like there is enough interest and a lot of positive feedback to
move to a vote. If no objection I will start it tomorrow.
Cheers,
Hadrian
[1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IotaProposal
On 01/14/2016 05:19 PM, Tony Fausti
Oh wait, we didn't say Apache Kafka. That should get this thread another
1000 hits ;-)
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:05 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> Thanks Hadrian!
>
> -Taylor
>
> > On Jan 14, 2016, at 8:48 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> >
> > hadrian@minotaur:~$ ls -al Tempo.zip
> > -rw-r--r-- 1
Thanks Hadrian!
-Taylor
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 8:48 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>
> hadrian@minotaur:~$ ls -al Tempo.zip
> -rw-r--r-- 1 hadrian hadrian 739185 Dec 19 16:45 Tempo.zip
>
> Available to anybody who can access the host above.
>
> Cheers,
> Hadrian
>
>
>> On 01/14/2016 07:21 PM,
Yes a PostgreSQL adaptor would be great and using Hadoop and Spark is a very
natural fit for Tempo. Other Apache projects like Flink be very useful.
-Tony
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 5:51 PM, Gregory Chase wrote:
>
> I'd recommend a PostgreSQL adaptor, which opens a huge new world.
>
> Of course, if
I'd recommend a PostgreSQL adaptor, which opens a huge new world.
Of course, if you are Apache and you are IOT, then Hadoop and Spark, and
all the streaming analytics technologies are key too.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Tony Faustini wrote:
> Thanks Gregory we look forward to seeing you a
hadrian@minotaur:~$ ls -al Tempo.zip
-rw-r--r-- 1 hadrian hadrian 739185 Dec 19 16:45 Tempo.zip
Available to anybody who can access the host above.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 01/14/2016 07:21 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
May I have access to the source code as well?
-Taylor
On Jan 11, 2016, at 8:
Hi Hadrian, we would have no problem with you sharing the Tempo (iota) source
code with Taylor.
-Tony
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 4:21 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
>
> May I have access to the source code as well?
>
> -Taylor
>
>> On Jan 11, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>
>> With a bit
May I have access to the source code as well?
-Taylor
> On Jan 11, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>
> With a bit of delay due to the Holidays season, I think it's time to continue
> this thread.
>
> The code has been available for a while to mentors and those who requested. I
> ass
Thanks Gregory we look forward to seeing you around. We currently use MySQL and
MongoDB but the data pipeline is written in in a way that any datastore could
be used.
Thanks
-Tony
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 3:24 PM, Gregory Chase wrote:
>
> I don't qualify as a "mentor", but plan on seeing me aroun
I don't qualify as a "mentor", but plan on seeing me around your community
as it develops. This is a very interesting topic for me.
Maybe you need a database or two. I know a few ;-)
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Tony Faustini wrote:
> Hi Hadrian, I have made the changes to the Tempo propo
Hi Hadrian, I have made the changes to the Tempo proposal relative to it’s
renaming as iota. The changes are in the proposal itself I don’’t think I can
rename the top-level project name from Tempo to iota (let me know if I can or
should). If anything else needs to be done please let me know.
T
Hadrian, I have modified the Tempo proposal to reflect a name change of Tempo
to iota (all lower case).
Thank you all for helping move this forward.
-Tony
> On Jan 11, 2016, at 5:35 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>
> With a bit of delay due to the Holidays season, I think it's time to continue
> t
e-
> From: Hadrian Zbarcea [mailto:hzbar...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 10:35 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: t...@litbit.com
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Tempo - A proposal for an enterprise IoT platform
>
> With a bit of delay due to the Holidays
...@litbit.com
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Tempo - A proposal for an enterprise IoT platform
With a bit of delay due to the Holidays season, I think it's time to
continue this thread.
The code has been available for a while to mentors and those who
requested. I assume the mentors did take a look at
With a bit of delay due to the Holidays season, I think it's time to
continue this thread.
The code has been available for a while to mentors and those who
requested. I assume the mentors did take a look at it, I certainly did.
The code looks clean and the idea sound. Plus the IoT field is one
Howdy
We are definitely open to make this public when Hadrian gives us the green
light
As for a name, we have proposed some names including "Iota". My understanding
is that asf has to accept it?
Thanks
Reza
www.litbit.com
> On Dec 30, 2015, at 11:55 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>
> The logic i
The logic is that the project afaik is not open source and the code not
publicly available. Until the project is accepted in the incubator I see
it fair to respect its current private status.
The code was provided to the ASF in good faith by litbit. I will note
that it wasn't Tony's express re
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea
wrote:
> The code was already made available. Since the project is not yet accepted
> in the incubator, we thought it best to not publish it.
What is the logic behind that decision?
Hi Roman,
The code was already made available. Since the project is not yet
accepted in the incubator, we thought it best to not publish it. Because
you expressed interest I sent you a private mail with the code location.
Tony needs to decide on the proposed name, it is unlikely that the
pro
On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Tony Faustini wrote:
> Hi Roman, yes there has been activity. I sent Hadrian the source code to
> review and share with others who are interested in being mentors. Our plan
> is to make it public via Github or Bitbucket. We are also reviewing the name
> ‘Tempo’ as
Hi Roman, yes there has been activity. I sent Hadrian the source code to review
and share with others who are interested in being mentors. Our plan is to make
it public via Github or Bitbucket. We are also reviewing the name ‘Tempo’ as
there may be a issue with TempoIQ (https://www.tempoiq.com/
Hi Tony!
Has there been any activity around this proposal? I find it really interesting,
and just like Hadrian I really would love to see the code on GitHub (although
it is NOT a pre-requisite to being consider for ASF Incubator).
Thanks,
Roman.
P.S. Greetings from your past life managing JavaSt
Hi Tony,
It is a very interesting proposal and I would like to help out as well.
I do have a bit of experience of the IoT field, both part of my ASF
contributions and other work I did. I volunteer to be a mentor or
champion. Looks like one of your understated goals is to grow a
community and
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Tony Faustini wrote:
>...
> This is the exact codebase that we would migrate to the Apache foundation.
>
> Upon entering Apache, Tempo will migrate to an Apache License 2.0 with
> all contributions licensed to the Apache Foundation. In certain cases
> if individual
I'd like to also offer to mentor, if you need one. I'm involved with
apache mynewt: http://mynewt.incubator.apache.org/ and generally
interested in seeing the ASF take on more IoT projects!
Sterling
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can be one of the mentors if yo
Hi,
I can be one of the mentors if you need one. I’m involved in the IoT space so
it's of interest .
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...
RSA 128 Bits (??)
Ouch!
Mike
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Top-posting because solidwalloftext.
> Sounds quite interesting, and it's (mostly) within language scopes I'm
> comfortable with (python, JS etc). I'd like to volunteer as a mentor for
> this, should it be appro
Top-posting because solidwalloftext.
Sounds quite interesting, and it's (mostly) within language scopes I'm
comfortable with (python, JS etc). I'd like to volunteer as a mentor for
this, should it be approved.
With regards,
Daniel
On 12/02/2015 09:34 PM, Tony Faustini wrote:
> To: general@incubat
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Hi All, Litbit is an enterprise IoT company comprised of individuals
that have worked for Yahoo, Apple, Microsoft, Sun Microsystems, Intel,
Cisco Systems and 365 Main. We are working with some of the world's
leading companies providing them with an enterprise IoT p
36 matches
Mail list logo
