Having the original author on board and an SGA from them would basically
lift any concerns I had.
So I'm wondering, are you guys ready to vote?
John
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:47 PM P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
>
> On Apr 25, 2016, at 4:41 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
> I would recommend docu
> On Apr 25, 2016, at 1:19 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Having the original author on board and an SGA from them would basically
> lift any concerns I had.
>
> So I'm wondering, are you guys ready to vote?
I believe so. I think all of the questions and concerns have been addressed.
I’ll start
> On Apr 25, 2016, at 4:41 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
> I would recommend documenting whatever decisions you make and having
> them ratified by the Incubator PMC to make them acts of the ASF.
>
> The best might be to add a section to the podling proposal describing
> how the incoming c
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 3:28 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> And just to make sure you guys saw it, there was a (what I would consider)
> positive response from Legal:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-248 ...
I would recommend documenting whatever decisions you make and having
them ratifi
And just to make sure you guys saw it, there was a (what I would consider)
positive response from Legal:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-248
John
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 4:56 PM P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
>
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 2:39 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>
> Otherwise there a
HI All,
With helping this proposal achieving a favourable outcome, may I suggest to
do some - albeit subtle (we don't it to be regarded as spam) - promotion
addressed at the Apache Spark community. Spark is AKKA based, and AKKA is a
heavy Gossip user. Maybe some promotion targeted at the AKKa comm
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 2:39 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>
> Otherwise there also could also be issues with the name Apache Gossip of
> the original "lives on", so you would have to be prepared to change the
> name, if needed.
I don’t think we’d have issues with the original authors, as Edward
ndeed!
>
>
> Regardless, this does not block a VOTE on proposing Gossip for the
> Incubator. It is something which may resolve itself at a later date. I
> would suggest that this bridge can be crossed when the Gossip incubating
> community comes to it.
>
> I'll look forward to
not block a VOTE on proposing Gossip for the
>>>> Incubator. It is something which may resolve itself at a later date. I
>>>> would suggest that this bridge can be crossed when the Gossip incubating
>>>> community comes to it.
>>>>
>
> > Incubator. It is something which may resolve itself at a later date. I
> >> > would suggest that this bridge can be crossed when the Gossip
> incubating
> >> > community comes to it.
> >> >
> >> > I'll look forward to the Champion o
t; would suggest that this bridge can be crossed when the Gossip incubating
>> > community comes to it.
>> >
>> > I'll look forward to the Champion opening a VOTE thread.
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:46 PM, <
>>
> incubating
> > > community comes to it.
> > >
> > > I'll look forward to the Champion opening a VOTE thread.
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:46 PM, <
> > general-digest-h...@incubator.apache
t a later date. I
> > would suggest that this bridge can be crossed when the Gossip incubating
> > community comes to it.
> >
> > I'll look forward to the Champion opening a VOTE thread.
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:46 PM, <
> general-
d when the Gossip incubating
> community comes to it.
>
> I'll look forward to the Champion opening a VOTE thread.
> Thanks
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:46 PM, >
> wrote:
>
> > From: Roman Shaposhnik
> > To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
&
o it.
>
> I'll look forward to the Champion opening a VOTE thread.
> Thanks
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:46 PM, >
> wrote:
>
> > From: Roman Shaposhnik
> > To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> > Cc:
> > Date: Tue, 19 Apr 201
hen the Gossip incubating
community comes to it.
I'll look forward to the Champion opening a VOTE thread.
Thanks
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:46 PM,
wrote:
> From: Roman Shaposhnik
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Cc:
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:25:43 -0700
&
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:55 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> I can't speak with 100% certainty, but it sounds like an SGA would be
> expected prior to importing into an ASF repo.
That's the usual protocol.
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubs
I can't speak with 100% certainty, but it sounds like an SGA would be
expected prior to importing into an ASF repo.
John
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:28 AM Edward Capriolo
wrote:
> "One question I have, just because the googlecode shutdown is pretty
> confusing. Was this development originally fr
"One question I have, just because the googlecode shutdown is pretty
confusing. Was this development originally from this group (e.g. was it
originally Edward Capriolo?) or was it someone else that may need to pursue
a SGA from?"
Good question.
The development was not originally from this group.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> In the Quickstep proposal, Roman explicitly listed himself as both Champion
> and Mentor.
> I think that is a good model to follow. If someone lists themselves only as
> Champion would
> I assume that their responsibilities end shortly after
Thanks Julian,
I updated the proposal to be more explicit regarding my intentions to act as a
mentor as well.
-Taylor
> On Apr 18, 2016, at 8:59 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> In the Quickstep proposal, Roman explicitly listed himself as both Champion
> and Mentor. I think that is a good model to
Looking at the list, we typically target 3 mentors. I see that already on
this proposal, so I'm not sure that more are needed. Plus its only 5
committers, so its a good balance. It also helps that many are already
familiar with the ASF and the champion is already considering himself in
the commi
In the Quickstep proposal, Roman explicitly listed himself as both Champion and
Mentor. I think that is a good model to follow. If someone lists themselves
only as Champion would I assume that their responsibilities end shortly after
incubation starts.
To use the “it takes a village” metaphor,
Thanks for the input Henry!
I've seen proposals in the past come with what seems like a fully-baked list of
mentors, and others with a short list that could obviously benefit from having
more mentors and are looking for volunteers.
I think Gossip falls into the latter category and would welcome
I would recommend getting more mentors to help. Especially almost half of
initial committers are not from Apache and the other half seemed very busy
with other projects.
- Henry
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:42 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> Bump.
>
> Are there any further comments/questions on the
Bump.
Are there any further comments/questions on the proposal? Or should we proceed
with a VOTE?
-Taylor
> On Apr 13, 2016, at 6:58 PM, Edward Capriolo wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to open up a discussion on the following proposal:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GossipPropos
Hello all,
I would like to open up a discussion on the following proposal:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GossipProposal
Besides those mentioned in the proposal, thank you to Jake Ferrel, Lewis
McGibbne, and Nate McCall who were a tremendous help!
A copy of the proposal is below:
= Abstract
27 matches
Mail list logo
