I can't speak with 100% certainty, but it sounds like an SGA would be
expected prior to importing into an ASF repo.

John

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:28 AM Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> "One question I have, just because the googlecode shutdown is pretty
> confusing.  Was this development originally from this group (e.g. was it
> originally Edward Capriolo?) or was it someone else that may need to pursue
> a SGA from?"
>
> Good question.
> The development was not originally from this group. The code in google code
> was Apache V2 licensed. I forked roughly a year ago. At the time I let the
> original authors be aware of the fork by posting a comment to the google
> group. One of those authors acked the message.
>
> In any case how is this handled where a fork is made from some apache v2
> code , and then that code is committed?
>
> There is another way we can handle this. Large portions already deviate
> from the original. During Apache Gossip I expect implementing more advanced
> features will cause a re-write. I understand how all the core pieces work,
> so we can start clean room it adds some complexity initially.
>
> I am in the process of tracking down the original authors as they might be
> interested in joining the effort. However as you mentioned the google code
> shut down is annoying since the "forums" have gone read only.
>
> Thanks,
> Edward
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:27 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Looking at the list, we typically target 3 mentors.  I see that already
> on
> > this proposal, so I'm not sure that more are needed.  Plus its only 5
> > committers, so its a good balance.  It also helps that many are already
> > familiar with the ASF and the champion is already considering himself in
> > the committer and mentor phases.  If its really believed that more
> mentors
> > may help, I'd be happy to help.
> >
> > One question I have, just because the googlecode shutdown is pretty
> > confusing.  Was this development originally from this group (e.g. was it
> > originally Edward Capriolo?) or was it someone else that may need to
> pursue
> > a SGA from?
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:59 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > In the Quickstep proposal, Roman explicitly listed himself as both
> > > Champion and Mentor. I think that is a good model to follow. If someone
> > > lists themselves only as Champion would I assume that their
> > > responsibilities end shortly after incubation starts.
> > >
> > > To use the “it takes a village” metaphor, I think that incubator
> projects
> > > really need one or two committed parents rather than lots and lots of
> > > part-time aunts and uncles.
> > >
> > > Julian
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Apr 18, 2016, at 5:52 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the input Henry!
> > > >
> > > > I've seen proposals in the past come with what seems like a
> fully-baked
> > > list of mentors, and others with a short list that could obviously
> > benefit
> > > from having more mentors and are looking for volunteers.
> > > >
> > > > I think Gossip falls into the latter category and would welcome
> > > volunteer mentors. So consider this a call for additional mentors.
> > > >
> > > > In recent incubator discussions there's been some debate about the
> role
> > > of champion and how it relates to mentoring. I'm personally not sure
> > where
> > > I stand in that debate, and so have not commented. I accepted the role
> of
> > > champion with the intent of also acting as a mentor going forward.
> > > >
> > > > Is that (champion also acting as a mentor) something that we (IPMC)
> > > think should be explicitly called out in the proposal?
> > > >
> > > > -Taylor
> > > >
> > > >> On Apr 18, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> I would recommend getting more mentors to help. Especially almost
> half
> > > of
> > > >> initial committers are not from Apache and the other half seemed
> very
> > > busy
> > > >> with other projects.
> > > >>
> > > >> - Henry
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:42 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <
> ptgo...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Bump.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Are there any further comments/questions on the proposal? Or should
> > we
> > > >>> proceed with a VOTE?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -Taylor
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On Apr 13, 2016, at 6:58 PM, Edward Capriolo <
> edlinuxg...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Hello all,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I would like to open up a discussion on the following proposal:
> > > >>>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GossipProposal
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Besides those  mentioned in the proposal, thank you to Jake
> Ferrel,
> > > Lewis
> > > >>>> McGibbne, and Nate McCall who were a tremendous help!
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> A copy of the proposal is below:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> = Abstract =
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Apache Gossip will be an implementation of the Gossip Protocol
> based
> > > >>>> on code available here: https://github.com/edwardcapriolo/gossip/
> > > >>>> which is already licenced using the glorious Apache V2 License.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> = Proposal =
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Apache Gossip aims to provide a gossip based consensus protocol
> > > >>>> written in Java for peer-to-peer communication to the Apache
> > Incubator
> > > >>>> (http://incubator.apache.org/). This implementation will
> > effectively
> > > >>>> scale from one to one-thousand node clusters. In addition to the
> > code
> > > >>>> implementation, the project should produce specifications of the
> > wire
> > > >>>> protocol, features, and expected behavior of the system such that
> > > >>>> compatible implementations can communicate.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> = Background =
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The gossip protocol has been implemented to varying levels of
> rigor
> > by
> > > >>>> a number of entities. In particular, Apache Cassandra uses an
> > > >>>> implementation of gossip to locate peers and transmit up/down
> state.
> > > >>>> Apache Spark leverages tooling in Akka which provides peer-to-peer
> > > >>>> node discovery capabilities.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> *
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> http://highscalability.com/blog/2011/11/14/using-gossip-protocols-for-failure-detection-monitoring-mess.html
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gossip_protocol
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> = Rationale =
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> With distributed computing becoming extremely widespread, and the
> > > >>>> growth of the buzz-factor of ‘the-internet-of-things’ it is
> > > >>>> increasingly important that networks of IP addressable devices can
> > > >>>> form a peer-to-peer network. Applications of peer-to-peer networks
> > > >>>> include generating crypto currency, managing hardware such as
> solar
> > > >>>> power micro-grids, and more traditional roles like grid/High
> > > >>>> Performance Computing and distributed storage systems. Different
> > > >>>> implements of gossip based consensus protocols have been
> implemented
> > > >>>> in numerous languages or as part of more complex software stacks.
> > The
> > > >>>> Apache foundation should lead the effort of producing a purpose
> > built
> > > >>>> tool that can be used by downstream projects to form peer-to-peer
> > > >>>> networks.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> = Initial Goals =
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> * Migration of current code
> > https://github.com/edwardcapriolo/gossip
> > > >>>> to the Apache Software Foundation
> > > >>>> * Secure communications
> > > >>>> * Transport security using a pre-shared key
> > > >>>> * Public Key Infrastructure
> > > >>>> * Introduce a cluster name to wire protocol to avoid
> > misconfigurations
> > > >>>> * Effectively operate when systems have multiple network
> interfaces
> > > >>>> by controlling IP binding settings
> > > >>>> * Effectively operate when systems have Network Address
> Translations
> > > >>>> devices between them using a broadcast IP settings
> > > >>>> * Develop advanced integration testing from cluster sizes of
> 1-1000
> > > nodes
> > > >>>> * Test convergence times
> > > >>>> * Demonstrate the tradeoffs of different settings in regard to
> > > >>>> bandwidth/cpu/convergence time/accuracy
> > > >>>> * Gossip data other than cluster state such as application/user
> data
> > > >>>> * Provide detailed specifications such that others can implement
> the
> > > >>>> protocol in other programming languages
> > > >>>> * Explore HTTP transport as an alternative to UDP
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> = Current Status =
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The current code has been around for some time. Previously it was
> a
> > > >>>> google code project. Since the fork in January 2015 there have
> been
> > 55
> > > >>>> commits and 4 releases.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> == Meritocracy ==
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> We believe in meritocracy. All suggestions are taken seriously. We
> > > >>>> enjoy helping new people become part of process. For other
> projects
> > > >>>> available on our github, once a user shows enough activity we
> grant
> > > >>>> them collaborator status.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> == Community ==
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> In a relatively short amount of time, with a small amount of
> > promotion
> > > >>>> on twitter and through blogging, we have 50+ followers on github
> and
> > > >>>> several forks of the project.. With the Apache brand we should be
> > able
> > > >>>> to attract more. Once we have entered the incubator we believe it
> > will
> > > >>>> be easier to attempt to unify with other similar implementations.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> == Core Developers ==
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The code was forked on Jan 9th 2015, since then there have been 4
> > > >>>> releases and 55 commits. The majority of th work is by Edward
> > > >>>> Capriolo. Several people are interested in the features of this
> > > >>>> proposal and have indicated they will volunteer their time.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> == Alignment ==
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Apache is the perfect organization to take on this Gossip project.
> > > >>>> Besides benefiting a number of projects directly, the active
> > > >>>> development and reach will help Gossip be adopted and a leader in
> > the
> > > >>>> space.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> = Known Risks =
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Several existing implementations of similar cluster membership
> > systems
> > > >>>> (gossip based and otherwise) exist. A key challenge is moving
> from a
> > > >>>> relatively niche technical audience to a more general tool for
> > solving
> > > >>>> a common problem. Differentiating when Apache Gossip may be the
> > > >>>> optimal solution versus a clouded landscape of coordination
> services
> > > >>>> such as etcd or zookeeper, and distributed data stores via feature
> > set
> > > >>>> will also be key. We believe that users be attracted to the
> > > >>>> peer-to-peer distributed service toolkit that gossip will provide.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> == Orphaned products ==
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> We plan on building on the current code by developing discrete
> > > >>>> features with a focus on testing. Up until this point the project
> > has
> > > >>>> been maintained be a single person. However the project currently
> > > >>>> releases artifacts to maven central, is tested using travis CI,
> and
> > > >>>> follows controlled development practice. This level of dedication
> > will
> > > >>>> see the process through the initial stages.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> == Inexperience with Open Source ==
> > > >>>> We are very familiar with Open Source development and the Apache
> > > >>>> Foundation. The current code base already carries an Apache V2
> > > >>>> Licence.
> > > >>>> == Homogenous Developers ==
> > > >>>> Multiple people have made contributions to the current code base.
> > This
> > > >>>> proposal has generated more interest and several more are offering
> > to
> > > >>>> volunteer time. These volunteers are from diverse corporate
> > entities.
> > > >>>> == Reliance on Salaried Developers ==
> > > >>>> We wish to create Apache Gossip for the challenge of producing
> great
> > > >>>> software. Initially all members of the project will volunteer
> their
> > > >>>> time and no one will be expressly salaried to work only on this
> > > >>>> project.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> == Relationships with Other Apache Products ==
> > > >>>> If the Apache Gossip project is successful, other products in
> Apache
> > > >>>> such as Storm or Cassandra could adopt it. However, adoption by
> > those
> > > >>>> specific projects is not our criteria for success. There are a
> large
> > > >>>> number of applications for this system. One example is Apache
> JMeter
> > > >>>> could be built with Apache Gossip as a backend for distributed
> > > >>>> testing. Another example is a polyglot registry of thrift services
> > > >>>> with gossip based discovery.
> > > >>>> == A Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand ==
> > > >>>> We care about the Apache foundation. Having the recognition of the
> > > >>>> Apache incubator will undoubtedly help the project. We do not seek
> > the
> > > >>>> Apache brand to be used as legal shield or personal glory. We
> > believe
> > > >>>> in the Apache foundation and will manage the project with espirit
> de
> > > >>>> corps, welcoming all through meritocracy while using bylaws as
> > guiding
> > > >>>> values.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> = Initial Source =
> > > >>>> The initial source for https://github.com/edwardcapriolo/gossip
> was
> > > >>>> forked from https://code.google.com/p/java-gossip/. The code base
> > > >>>> always Apache V2 licensed.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> = Source and Intellectual Property Submission Plan =
> > > >>>> 1. Make final commit on teknek-gossip explaining the move to ASF.
> > > >>>> 1. Move code into ASF repo.
> > > >>>> 1. Rename references to old name.
> > > >>>> 1. Apply Apache V2 licence to all source files.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> = External Dependencies =
> > > >>>> Currently the project encodes messages into JSON for network
> > > >>>> transmission. This is done using JSONorg, but will switch to
> jackson
> > > >>>> (potentially before the move to the ASF).
> > > >>>> = Cryptography =
> > > >>>> The current code is not using cryptography. It is on the road map
> to
> > > >>>> add security through transport encryption (SSL) and transport
> > > >>>> encryption.
> > > >>>> = Required Resources =
> > > >>>> == Mailing lists ==
> > > >>>> * d...@gossip.incubator.apache.org
> > > >>>> * comm...@gossip.incubator.apache.org
> > > >>>> * priv...@gossip.incubator.apache.org
> > > >>>> The user list will be added when we have broader adoption.
> > > >>>> == Git Repository ==
> > > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-gossip.git
> > > >>>> == Issue Tracking ==
> > > >>>> JIRA tracker: GOSSIP
> > > >>>> = Initial Committers =
> > > >>>> * Edward Capriolo (Hive Committer, PMC)
> > > >>>> * P. Taylor Goetz (Storm PMC)
> > > >>>> * Gary Dusbabek (Cassandra Committer, PMC)
> > > >>>> * Dorian Ellerbe (requires CLA)
> > > >>>> * Sathish Dhinakaran (requires CLA)
> > > >>>> = Affiliations =
> > > >>>> With diverse contributors the project will be able to make
> balanced
> > > >>>> decisions best for the future of the project.
> > > >>>> = Additional Interested Contributors =
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Those interested in getting involved with the project as it starts
> > are
> > > >>>> encourage to list themselves here.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> * (next entry here)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> = Sponsors =
> > > >>>> == Champion ==
> > > >>>> P. Taylor Goetz has offered to champion.
> > > >>>> == Mentors ==
> > > >>>> * Sean Busbey (ASF Member, IPMC, various Apache PMCs, YCSB
> > maintainer)
> > > >>>> * Josh Elser (ASF Member, IPMC, Apache Accumulo PMC, Apache
> Calcite
> > > PMC)
> > > >>>> = Sponsoring Entity =
> > > >>>> The Incubator
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to