Good idea, thx!
On 7/13/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 14 July 2007 00:30, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Agreed. So here is the new version:
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
>
On Saturday 14 July 2007 00:30, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Agreed. So here is the new version:
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project, to be known as
>
Agreed. So here is the new version:
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
Foundation's purpose to establish a Project, to be known as
"Apache ServiceMix Project", related to an extensible messaging
Am just about to disappear on vacation for a week offline; so here's my +1
On 7/13/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sounds good to me
On 7/13/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/13/07, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/13/07, Guillaume Nodet <
Sounds good to me
On 7/13/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/13/07, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/13/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What about "a pluggable messaging bus for enterprise service
> > integration, mediation and composition
On 7/13/07, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/13/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about "a pluggable messaging bus for enterprise service
> integration, mediation and composition and its related components" ?
> I'd like to keep out the acronyms if possible ...
No
On 7/13/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What about "a pluggable messaging bus for enterprise service
integration, mediation and composition and its related components" ?
I'd like to keep out the acronyms if possible ...
No objection from me. I'd prefer to keep out the acronyms -
What about "a pluggable messaging bus for enterprise service
integration, mediation and composition and its related components" ?
I'd like to keep out the acronyms if possible ...
On 7/12/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What about a service oriented messaging bus, allowing both in V
On 7/12/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 12 July 2007 05:59, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> enterprise service integration
I find this project description too broad. Since I don't know what ServiceMix
is about I can't suggest something better.
Below is a stab at a descriptio
What about a service oriented messaging bus, allowing both in VM and outside
of VM exchanges and composition?
On 7/12/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/12/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ServiceMixis an ESB based on JBI that can be used for SOA.
> We pur
On 7/12/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ServiceMixis an ESB based on JBI that can be used for SOA.
We purposedly avoided those acronyms in the scope. Do you think
we should bring them back or add a longer description ?
please don't bring them back in - let's try to cut through t
ServiceMixis an ESB based on JBI that can be used for SOA.
We purposedly avoided those acronyms in the scope. Do you think
we should bring them back or add a longer description ?
On 7/12/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 12 July 2007 05:59, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> enter
On Thursday 12 July 2007 05:59, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> enterprise service integration
I find this project description too broad. Since I don't know what ServiceMix
is about I can't suggest something better.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
13 matches
Mail list logo
