Understood. To be clear, I was merely stating a wish for how a migration
might work, because I think GitBox is great and would like to see as many
people have it as an option as possible. My wish is not a statement about
what infra currently is willing or capable of doing.
I'm sensitive to infra's
Hi -
Pulsar has been using this and I am +1.
I do have some community related observations that are worth mentioning.
(1) Pulsar is directing all of GitHub activity in both the code repository and
the git wiki to the dev list. This content does serve as both the main view to
see what is going
The service is not in general release, so no: we won't be mass-migrating
projects, and we reserve the right to halt migration requests.
On Jul 28, 2017 13:30, "Christopher" wrote:
> +1
>
> However, I would personally prefer to see all projects using git-wip
> automatically migrated to GitBox, an
+1 non-binding
PredictionIO started on GitHub and the majority of new contributions still
come from there.
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:30 AM Christopher wrote:
> +1
>
> However, I would personally prefer to see all projects using git-wip
> automatically migrated to GitBox, and have the old host(
+1
However, I would personally prefer to see all projects using git-wip
automatically migrated to GitBox, and have the old host(s) redirect to
gitbox, so the migration is completely transparent. It doesn't force any
projects to use GitBox features, but I can't see any downside, and it gives
everyb
+1
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:00 AM aditi hilbert wrote:
> +1
> The Apache Mynewt community loves it.
>
> thanks,
> aditi
>
> > On Jul 28, 2017, at 8:48 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > As many are aware, Infra has been rolling out a new service that allows
> > projects to levera
+1
The Apache Mynewt community loves it.
thanks,
aditi
> On Jul 28, 2017, at 8:48 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> All,
>
> As many are aware, Infra has been rolling out a new service that allows
> projects to leverage git repositories dually hosted on github and ASF git
> repositories, commonly
I am +1 on this.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Chris
On 7/28/17, 9:00 AM, "Mahdi Mohammadi" wrote:
I agree with this. Providing support for GitHub for all projects makes it
easier for everyone to contribute and follow up the project.
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 4:48 PM, John D. Ament
wro
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:48 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> As many are aware, Infra has been rolling out a new service that allows
>> projects to leverage git repositories dually hosted on github and AS
+1
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:48 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> All,
>
> As many are aware, Infra has been rolling out a new service that allows
> projects to leverage git repositories dually hosted on github and ASF git
> repositories, commonly known as gitbox. This effectively allows a project
>
I agree with this. Providing support for GitHub for all projects makes it
easier for everyone to contribute and follow up the project.
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 4:48 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> All,
>
> As many are aware, Infra has been rolling out a new service that allows
> projects to leverage g
All,
As many are aware, Infra has been rolling out a new service that allows
projects to leverage git repositories dually hosted on github and ASF git
repositories, commonly known as gitbox. This effectively allows a project
to commit directly to Github and have those commits reflect back on the
12 matches
Mail list logo
