+1 (binding)
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 6:07 PM Furkan KAMACI
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 6:31 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
> > +1 – mck ipmc
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 at 03:31, Craig Russell
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 clr (IPMC)
> > >
> > > > On Nov 21, 2024, at 04:15, Mic
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 5:53 PM Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2024, 2:48 PM Kevin Ratnasekera
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 11:11 PM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <
> > jcama...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > >
Any request that could be misunderstood to mean the entire PMC should
really be accompanied by a DISCUSS or VOTE thread or some other record of a
committee discussion.
There is nothing wrong with educating folks on the correct acronyms but
personally I really don't see that one sticking - it is too
I'd be interested to know whether there is any real semantic danger here or
whether it is a flavor of Misophonia.
I've personally never misunderstood someone in the context of their
conversation.
If there is a real danger like a decision being made for a whole community
based on someone calling th
+1 (binding)
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 1:33 PM Weiwei Yang wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 8:59 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Sorry, the links have not been pasted correctly:
> >
> > Here's the discussion:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/5bp5t0hgq2c419m62m2zt71jkv8bhhho
> >
>
Looks interesting to me.
I would be willing to be an additional mentor or join the initial set of
team members if there is interest.
+1
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 11:21 AM Charles Zhang
wrote:
> +1
> It looks like a good project with many application scenarios.
>
> Best wishes,
> Charles Zhang
> f
+1 binding
Can't we move the indicator to the About section where it says Mirror of
(project name).
Extend that to include Under Incubation as well.
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 10:53 AM Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 5/8/24 09:45, sebb wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 15:15, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> >>
> >>
+1 (binding)
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 11:32 PM Rakesh Radhakrishnan
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I'm contributing to the Apache Hadoop project and mentoring Hive
> contributors in my company. It's a great initiative. The project looks
> interesting to me and can be really useful to the ecosyste
Interesting.
I am available as a mentor if you are interested.
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 5:30 PM PJ Fanning wrote:
> Hi Ismaël,
> Could you make a request to join the Incubator PMC? ASF members will
> be accepted into the PMC. It's just that podling mentors need to be
> part of the PMC.
> Requests
+annou...@apache.org +annou...@hadoop.apache.org
+general@incubator.apache.org
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 2:34 PM Damon Cortesi wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> After a long hiatus, The Apache Livy team is proud to announce the release
> of Apache Livy
> 0.8.0-incubating.
>
> Livy is a web service that ex
Carrying over my vote: +1 (binding)
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 1:23 PM PJ Fanning wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I checked
> * checksums and signatures
> * DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE, THIRD-PARTY files exist
> * ASF headers in source files
> * source builds
>
> I still think improvements can be made to
Okay. Last release was a different group of people. Doesn't seem terribly
reasonable but, @dac...@apache.org - it seems that we
need to pull those JIRA into 0.8.0 and spin a new RC.
On Tue, Aug 8, 2023, 11:19 PM wrote:
> Hi,
>
> These issues were mentioned in the last release; generally, things
@Justin Mclean - thoughts?
On Sat, Aug 5, 2023 at 11:51 AM larry mccay wrote:
> @justin - I've filed the following two JIRA to
> address your reported issues for release 0.8.1, if you approve.
> Waiting on the status of the category X binary license issues - I know
> @dac..
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LIVY-984
On Sat, Aug 5, 2023 at 9:45 AM larry mccay wrote:
> Hi Justin -
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
> Given that this is the first release since the reboot of the community, I
> am wondering whether these really have to be blockers.
> We can file JIRA
Hi Justin -
Thanks for the review!
Given that this is the first release since the reboot of the community, I
am wondering whether these really have to be blockers.
We can file JIRAs for each of those issues and address them in the next
release.
These aren't regressions after all and there have be
Carrying my vote forward from community vote.
+1
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 8:29 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> HI,
>
> There are GPL and LGPL licensed jars in the zip. I'm not sure but I
> thought we couldn't include jars with category X licenses in our
> binary distributions.
> It
h a header.
>
> Furthermore, with the new year, the copyright statements in the NOTICE
> files are now out of date as you observed. I'm assuming this will require a
> new release candidate?
>
> Thanks,
> Riley
>
> On 2022/12/30 23:39:13 larry mccay wrote:
> > I wanted t
I wanted to lend a hand with the sdap 1.0.0 release review and wanted to
let you know that it seems a bit cumbersome to review.
Perhaps my experience with other projects is limited to similar
conventions, though.
The fact that the src artifacts aren't under a project specific root ended
up polluti
had a great experience
> building with you all. I personally believe we should free the incubator's
> time and attention to concentrate on other projects. I also believe the
> project is mature enough to function outside of the incubator.
>
> I vote +1 to graduate Tuweni from the i
uch
> higher if the community leader is hard to reach or is slow to respond
> to feedback and questions for lack of time."
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/InnerSourceCommons/InnerSourcePatterns/blob/main/patterns/2-structured/dedicated-community-leader.md#forces
> [2]https://innersou
I'm not so sure that I see this as a blocker for graduation.
There was enough consensus and testing to spin and publish 14 releases.
There has been healthy conversation about this very topic among the mentors
and contributors on the private list.
The nature of this project is that the consumption
Built from source, checked NOTICE and LICENSE files
+1
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 7:10 PM Antoine Toulme wrote:
> We are short at least one vote - would anyone please be able to test out
> this release and vote?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Antoine
>
> > On Nov 24, 2022, at 12:25 PM, Furkan KAMACI
> wrote:
>
Hi IPMC -
Damon Cortesi has expressed interest in joining the revived PPMC for the
Livy Podling.
I will be adding them as requested and this serves as notice of our doing
so.
thanks!
--larry
Hi IPMC -
Shaofeng Li has expressed interest in joining the revived PPMC for the Livy
Podling.
I will be adding them as requested and this service as notice of our doing
so.
thanks!
--larry
Please subscribe to the Livy lists as I plan to start DISCUSS threads on a
couple topics to help bootstrap.
We don't need to wait for everyone to be added to start the community
conversations.
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 9:08 PM larry mccay wrote:
> All -
>
> I have sent a single inv
y
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 4:49 AM Marco Gaido wrote:
> Hi Larry,
>
> I also expressed my interest in still being part of the community. At
> least for the thriftserver part, which I contributed and maintained.
>
> Thanks,
> Marco
>
> Il giorno lun 31 ott 2022 alle ore
.
Since we have already sent the notice, we will add you to the Livy podling
roster upon receipt of your ICLAs.
thanks,
--larry
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 2:09 PM larry mccay wrote:
> All -
>
> In preparing to add the members listed in this NOTICE, I came to realize
> that we have a n
Thanks, Justin.
I'll get that part moving tomorrow sometime.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022, 4:37 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to add all existing Apache committers from this list in this
> thread within the next hour or so but will also follow up with the
> individuals to formally invite t
tters however.
thanks,
--larry
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 2:30 PM larry mccay wrote:
> Hi Incubator -
>
> In an effort to revive the Livy podling [1], it is being proposed to
> adjust the existing Livy PPMC by adding new members that plan to move the
> project forward, remove m
that if after 72 hrs there are no objections
an IPMC member would be able to make these changes.
Mentors
-
Larry McCay, lmc...@apache.org , Cloudera
-
Sunil Govindan, sun...@apache.org, Cloudera
-
Jean-Baptiste Onofré, jbono...@apache.org, Talend
-
Madhawa Gunasekara
ing out!
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 5:38 PM Marco Gaido wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am also busy with different projects at the moment, as such I am
> > more than happy if ai can help somehow, e.g. reviewing code in parts
> > that I know, but I cannot allocate muc
Great, I'll move that forward.
That sounds like a NOTICE thread?
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 4:16 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Usually, the PPMC would need to vote on adding new PPMC members, but it
> seems Livy no longer has 3 active PPMC members. The chair of the project
> can add PMC member
h to dedicate to Livy.
>
>
> Alex Bozarth
> Jupyter Architect, IBM CODAIT
> GitHub: ajbozarth
>
> On 10/24/22, 1:41 PM, "larry mccay" wrote:
>
> Gentle reminder that we need to determine next steps here.
> We have an updated proposal on this threa
Gentle reminder that we need to determine next steps here.
We have an updated proposal on this thread.
Do we need a VOTE or can we move forward directly to adjusting the members,
etc?
Thanks!
--larry
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:26 PM larry mccay wrote:
> @Justin Mclean - any insights on n
@Justin Mclean - any insights on next steps here?
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 5:44 PM larry mccay wrote:
> Very good, here is the latest revision with updated Mentors.
> Sunil and I have been added to the IPMC as well.
> Welcome Madhawa and thanks for stepping up as a Mentor
t;
> > > I noticed that Justin has sent a NOTICE:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ftfqgmq1tztdb6fwvmg9obckp7nbpbo
> > >
> > > Generally, you will be added to the IPMC in three days.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > tison.
> > >
> > &g
I've been wondering about this as well.
It seems that we can have a rather mature project still incubating after a
number of years.
We can have active consumers relying on it but the momentum of the original
project and maintainers waned.
Multiple external forks have been made with the inability to
Revival:
-
Add new Mentors
-
Larry McCay, lmc...@apache.org , Cloudera
-
Sunil Govindan, sun...@apache.org, Cloudera
-
Jean-Baptiste Onofré, jbono...@apache.org, Talend
-
Madhawa Gunasekara, madhaw...@gmail.com, Independent
-
Add new
at 2:18 PM Madhawa Gunasekara
wrote:
> Hi Larry,
>
> I'm interested in working with Livy and would like to join as a Mentor.
>
> Thanks,
> Madhawa
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 6:57 PM larry mccay wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I missed commenting on this:
> &g
Sorry, I missed commenting on this:
"There is also no concept as an emeritus PPMC member at the ASF."
I assume that we can remove PPMC members that do not opt-in explicitly at
this point.
They will have every opportunity to rejoin.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 12:48 PM larry mccay wrote:
Hi -
It has come to my attention that I don't seem to be an IPMC member
(anymore?) and I would like to officially Mentor the reboot of Livy.
thanks!
--larry
I will ask in a separate thread, @Justin Mclean -
thanks.
Adding JB adds another company and we are certainly open to anyone else
that would like to join as a mentor.
At the end of the day, the mentors are for instilling the Apache Way
knowledge and steering toward graduation.
I feel that this div
Approach to Revival:
-
Add new Mentors
-
Larry McCay, lmc...@apache.org , Cloudera
-
Sunil Govindan, sun...@apache.org, Cloudera
-
Imran Rashid - iras...@apache.org, Cloudera
-
Jean-Baptiste Onofré, jbono...@apache.org, Talend
-
Add new
Awesome - thanks, Justin!
On Sat, Oct 15, 2022, 11:51 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The project is free to choose RTC or RTC. I just wanted to check if it was
> considered. I’ve seen in some cases, CTR tends to put a lot of work onto
> existing committers and cause frustration when contribut
Hi Justin -
Thanks for the feedback.
I can buy all of that other than the dev practices suggestion.
The project originally used RTC as per the original proposal and being a
more mature podling, I don't think we need to move that fast.
With new committers, it will also be good to ensure others are
+d...@livy.incubator.apache.org
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 2:38 PM larry mccay wrote:
> Abstract
>
> Livy is a web service that exposes a REST interface for managing long
> running Apache Spark contexts in your cluster. With Livy, new applications
> can be built on top of Ap
improvements and fixes from organization’s
internally maintained forks back to a revived community.
General Approach to Revival:
-
Add new Mentors
-
Larry McCay, lmc...@apache.org , Cloudera
-
Sunil Govindan, sun...@apache.org, Cloudera
-
Imran Rashid
I have a simplified proposal nearly ready to send. Since there weren't any
requirements for it provided here it is just declaring the intent and new
members from this thread and my employer.
If there is anything else you'd like to see in it just let me know.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022, 9:46 AM Jean-Bap
t; On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 7:19 AM Brahma Reddy Battula
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Larry,
> > >
> > > Nice to hear from you that you are planning propose new features and
> make
> > > active.
> > >
> > > We do use Livy
Sure.
Thanks, Craig.
--larry
On Sun, Oct 9, 2022, 5:38 PM Craig Russell wrote:
> Hi Larry,
>
> > On Oct 8, 2022, at 10:30, larry mccay wrote:
> >
> > Good to hear, Jean-Baptiste!
> > We will send the proposal both here and to the Livy private list, I
> guess.
nd contribute on Livy.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 6:08 PM larry mccay wrote:
> >
> > I was hoping that we could bring a set of contributors as:
> >
> > * mentors - 1 or 2 plus whoever wants to remain
> > * PPMC/Committers - 2 or 3 plu
am, that would be great, and I
> > still agree to support. But it has to be concrete.
> >
> > Let's see what the other IPMC members are thinking, but IMHO, I doubt
> > we will have Livy back to life in the short term.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
>
Folks,
As I mentioned in a previous thread [1], I would like to help avoid sending
a well regarded, actively consumed and mature product to the attic. There
have been discussions internally at my employer and we have also struggled
getting our contributions committed. The original group of committ
63456-yoDW/?utm_source=linkedin_share&utm_medium=member_desktop_web
On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 9:55 AM larry mccay wrote:
> I would be willing to join livy as a committer and mentor in a reboot if
> there is interest.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2022, 3:05 AM Calvin Kirs wrote:
>
>
I would be willing to join livy as a committer and mentor in a reboot if
there is interest.
On Mon, Jul 4, 2022, 3:05 AM Calvin Kirs wrote:
> We had discussions last year, graduate or retire[1], but the project
> still keep has remained downturn.
>
> Therefore, I agree to retire.
>
> [1]https:/
tml/r752b4c407e5e89c0ba5a28cbe85e4784b728992731e845364e8c915a%40%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E
> <
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r752b4c407e5e89c0ba5a28cbe85e4784b728992731e845364e8c915a@%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E
> >
>
> The vote for Apache Tuweni 1.0.0 has concluded:
> +1s: 5
> Antoine Toulme
&g
This seems like an interesting proposal.
Couple points/questions:
* The existing source is not available for viewing as it is still in
private repos?
* Is it a primarily java project?
* It seems the intent of Rainbow is to not compete or overlap with the
Hadoop ecosystem projects but rather to pr
This looks interesting to me.
I would be willing to contribute, if you would like to add me to the
initial list of committers.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 10:50 AM Matt Sicker wrote:
> A lot of core R libraries seem to be under GPL. If we build more R
> projects at Apache, it seems like we may need
Congrats, Antoine and Apache Tuweni (Incubating) Community!
Have you sent a separate email to the dev@ and user@ tuweni lists as well?
If not, we should just include them on this one.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 8:51 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
> w00t!
>
> > On Jul 9, 2019, at 11:59 PM, Antoine Toulme
Antoine -
Thank you for your work getting the initial release done and patience here.
As Dave said, we have our 3 +1's.
thanks,
--larry
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 6:15 PM Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 4:29 PM Craig Russell
> wrote:
> >...
>
> > No. Smiley face doesn't count.
> >
It wasn't clear to me whether you were waiting for infra before issuing a
-1 - sorry to have read too much into that.
AFAIK - this is indeed still a first Apache release for Tuweni - not the
first attempt but I don't believe that 0.7.0 was successfully voted to
release.
The change of the release n
Going only by past experiences in the incubator, my understanding is that a
graduation blocking issue is not something that necessarily blocks a
podling release.
It would be something that should be noted and fixed in follow up releases
for sure.
Perhaps the letter of the law change or the level of
+1
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 6:59 PM William Guo wrote:
> +1
>
>
> William
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 9:11 AM Gang(Gary) Wang wrote:
>
> > +1 binding
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019, 5:43 PM Daniel Gruno wrote:
> >
> > > On 09/04/2019 15.00, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at
Apache Avac ???
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:57 PM Antoine Toulme wrote:
> There exists an outis open source project.
>
> Maybe we can riff on this name though.
>
> > On Mar 20, 2019, at 11:39, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> >
> > Indeed, http://nemo.apache.org/
> >
> > So I looked for similar ideas an
+1
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 8:33 PM Byung-Gon Chun wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 5:20 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Looking forward to this podling!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dave
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On Feb 20, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Antoine Toulme
+1
I would also be interested in being involved as an initial committer for
this.
thanks,
--larry
Apache Knox, PMC Chair
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:47 PM Selvamohan Neethiraj
wrote:
> +1
>
> Love to be part of this incubation project …..
>
> Thanks,
> Selva-
> Apache Ranger, PMC Chair
>
> > On
* built from source and ran all unit tests - over 1hr!
* checked LICENSE and NOTICE files
* Noticed things that others have already noted
* Noted that there is no CHANGES file in the release artifact - there is a
CHANGES.txt in
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.14.0-incubati
This will be a great addition.
+1
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> I'm calling a vote to accept "Livy" into the Apache Incubator.
>
> The full proposal is available below, and is also available in the wiki:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LivyProposal
>
t the moment.
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 7:21 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 3:04 PM larry mccay wrote:
>
> > Well said.
> > It is healthy to not have a podling graduate and subsequently struggle
> as a
> > TLP.
> > This is actually a success of sorts
Well said.
It is healthy to not have a podling graduate and subsequently struggle as a
TLP.
This is actually a success of sorts.
At least until a majority of podlings have trouble. :)
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> I think that we need to get over thinking of this state o
ibe to
> our private list.
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/pmc.html
>
> John
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:57 PM larry mccay wrote:
>
> > Hello -
> >
> > I would be interested in joining the IPMC and lending a hand within the
> > incubator.
> &
Hello -
I would be interested in joining the IPMC and lending a hand within the
incubator.
I have recently been made an ASF member, am a committer on Apache Knox,
Hadoop, Ranger and Metron.
Please let me know if there is anything that you need from me.
thanks,
--larry
Ooops - I may not be able to claim (binding) for general incubator...
My +1 (non-binding) still holds though. :)
Metron has demonstrated a terrific commitment to the Apache Way.
They get it and are definitely ready for graduation.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:33 PM, larry mccay wrote:
>
ity of the Apache Metron Project; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> > Apache Metron Project:
> >
> >
> > PPMC by Affiliation:
> >
> &
Other Resources ===
>
> * The project currently builds using Travis and right now there's no
> reason to change that.
> * The project leverages VersionEye for dependency up-to-date checks.
> * The project would like to plan to leverage coveralls for test coverage
> verificat
I can buy that, Justin.
Starting to better communicate that knowledge is very much appreciated!
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Someday a tool to codify this into a wizard like thing would be awesome.
> :)
>
> IMO (and I know others have different opinions) I d
Such a pain point while finding your way and even having to add something
later.
Thanks for taking the time for this!
Someday a tool to codify this into a wizard like thing would be awesome. :)
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Justin,
>
> Thank you for putting this up. T
Have to admit that I as confused by that as well.
I voted previously and didn't see a CANCEL - so I intended to dig through
the emails to see what I missed bit haven't gotten around to it.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Casey Stella wrote:
> Regarding what changed between RC6 and RC7, it was ju
how Apache
> >avoids hostile forks of projects, because we don't want to fork
> >communities. We've also added Larry McCay, P. Taylor Goetz, and Phillip
> >Rhodes to the proposal.
> >
> >The vote will run until 12pm PST on Sunday.
> >
> >Thanks
d no -1's. I've added them to
> the proposal.
>
> .. Owen
>
>
> >
> > -Taylor
> >
> > > On Nov 30, 2015, at 1:15 PM, larry mccay wrote:
> > >
> > > This is an interesting proposal that seems would build a community
> where
> &g
This is an interesting proposal that seems would build a community where an
open one doesn't really exist at the moment.
A project like this needs a healthy community to survive and scale with the
pace of changes in attacks.
I for one would be interested in lending a hand as a contributor or
commit
+1 - this would be a great resource for bootstrapping a new project!
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> +1
>
> I had the same thought when I built Calcite’s site based on jekyll
> (actually cloned from Orc’s site). Thanks for making this template — I’m
> sure it will be helpful
o it in any way.
The 7 Habits of Successful Podlings really is a great idea and would make
an interesting article. :)
Thanks,
--larry
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 11/05/2015 12:49 PM, larry mccay
ful guidance.
>
> If you think the tool as expressed enforces "rote learning" how would you
> suggest improving it to account for differences in communities? Are there
> particular points within the tool that you find less useful, or things that
> are missing?
>
> Re
+1 - I am concerned by the trend that I see developing here.
A set of interview questions for evaluation is one thing but criteria
checkboxes that will encourage behaviors by rote will not actually develop
more healthy communities just communities that can get the boxes checked.
While certain met
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Manoharan, Arun
wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal.
>
> I would like to call for a [VOTE] on Eagle joining the ASF as an
> incubation project.
>
> The vote is open for 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1 accept Eagle
Arun -
This is a very interesting proposal and I can imagine at least a couple
ways that it and Apache Knox could work together.
I would like to be a contributor to Eagle as well - if you are interested.
I am a committer and PMC member on Knox and Ranger and have contributed to
a number of ecosys
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Argus as a
> new Incubator project.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ArgusProposal, and is also included
> below.
+1 (non-binding)
On Apr 17, 2014 9:02 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote:
> I'd like to call a vote on accepting Slider into the incubator
>
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SliderProposal
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Slider into the Incubator
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Slider
> [ ] -1 Do not ac
sses on the cluster.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:07 AM, larry mccay
> wrote:
>
> > I agree with Marvin. Either works fine.
> > The original meaning of Hoya doesn't have to continue to be acknowledged.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at
I agree with Marvin. Either works fine.
The original meaning of Hoya doesn't have to continue to be acknowledged.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Steve Loughran
> wrote:
>
> > On that note, I know we've used the acronym "hoya", HBase
Hi Alejandro -
I believe that Steve has already acknowledged that a package rename is
required and that the project is likely not appropriate for Hadoop proper.
thanks,
--larry
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> I may have not been clear enough, I was referring to us
Thanks, sebb!
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 5:31 PM, sebb wrote:
> Done
>
> On 8 January 2014 18:42, larry mccay wrote:
> > Could I please have wiki write access for LarryMcCay to contribute to the
> > Hoya
> > incubat
Could I please have wiki write access for LarryMcCay to contribute to the
Hoya
incubator proposal?
Thanks!
Congrats, Billie!
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Apache Member Billie Rinaldi, the PMC Chair for Accumulo and a member of
> the
> Ambari PMC, has elected to join the Incubator PMC.
>
> May you have as much success as an IPMC member as you had as a PPMC member
> of
> th
t have two copies, although fixing that will be an
> > interesting maven challenge.
>
> Assembly descriptors allow files to be copied to a different place in
> the archive.
> This is trivial, so there is definitely no need for *two* copies.
>
> AFAIK Maven also allows jars t
is an inappropriate
assumption.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:30 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 20 November 2013 16:09, larry mccay wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > This is a call for a vote on Apache Knox Gateway 0.3.1 incubating.
> >
> > A vote was held on developer mailing li
/shell/BasicResponse.java.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Devaraj Das
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 on the RC. Downloaded, built and ran unit tests.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 8:00 PM, larry mccay wrote:
> >
Hello All -
Just to follow up on this thread, we will have these NOTICES file issues
corrected in the next release and assume that this VOTE will continue in
the absence of a -1 vote.
Thank you again, for the insight here.
--larry
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:40 AM, larry mccay wrote:
>
:
> On 20 November 2013 16:09, larry mccay wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > This is a call for a vote on Apache Knox Gateway 0.3.1 incubating.
> >
> > A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 3 +1's, and
> 0
> > -1's or +0's an
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
