t.
Should we wait for someone at the Incubator to file a ticket stating that
the podling is to be retired?
More specifically: should someone from the incubator file an infra ticket
to retire taverna? (There are project resources for taverna that haven't
been decommissioned.)
--
Cheers,
D
Justin,
Is someone from the PPMC available to file a podling retirement ticket with
infra?
cheers,
On 2020/07/10 23:00:08, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > What is the status of the taverna podling? The incubator website says it's
> > retired but the taverna website says it's still going.
>
Hi Incubator folks,
What is the status of the taverna podling? The incubator website says it's
retired but the taverna website says it's still going.
cheers,
Drew Foulks, ASF Infra
Perfect. Thanks Justin, thanks Dave.
On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 6:00 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> HI,
>
> Drew you were assigned to Milagro and Pinot, was a copy paste error when
> I was trying to reformat the page.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
Hi All,
I noticed that I fell off the shepherds list for May. Did something change
with the way shepherds are assigned after the report moved to Confluence?
Thanks,
Drew
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 9:54 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Report timeline for May:
> Wed May 01 -Podling
+1 to retire.
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:32 AM Ralph Goers
wrote:
> +1 to retire.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Jun 26, 2017, at 9:50 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > This is a call to vote the Sirona podling.
> >
> > A vote was called for on the dev list for Sirona [1], of which one mentor
comment re: signing address)
- checksums OK
- no binary files in release
- can compile from source
Thanks for the release,
Drew
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:48 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - name includes incubating
> - disclaimer exists
>
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 12:56 AM Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Balaji Ganesan <
> balaji.ganesa...@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 Great to see the prog
Hi Sean,
Unless I missed a response, no one has stepped up to mentor Gossip. I'd be
happy to do so.
Drew
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:03 PM Sean Busbey wrote:
> Hi Folks!
>
> Sadly, other commitments in my life require that I step down the amount of
> volunteer time I spend
properties)
- Builds successfully with 'mvn clean package'
- artifacts built contain 'incubating'
Thanks for the release,
Drew
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:34 PM Keith Turner wrote:
> Dear IPMC,
>
> Please vote for the following release candidate of Apache Fluo Recipes
+1 Binding
I checked:
- DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE all look good
- no unexpected binaries in source
- hashes good + signature verified
- builds from source release + unit tests pass
- Source files have ASF headers (except autogenerated files*)
- convenience binary looks good.
- incubating in n
Mike,
If this release can only be built with Maven 3.0.4, would it make sense to
set up the enforcer plugin to fail the build if an attempt is made to build
with something other than that version? It could help others avoid some
gnashing of teeth and document the specific requirement.
Drew
On
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:41 PM Josh Elser wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> On Jun 14, 2016 4:10 PM, "Billie Rinaldi" wrote:
>
> > Since discussion has died down and we have gotten a couple of additional
> > mentor volunteers, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting Pirk into the
> > Apach
+1 binding.
I checked the following:
- hashes
- gpg signature
- builds from source
- LICENSE file
- NOTICE file
- Source code headers
- no stray binaries
- release has incubating in version number
- Drew
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:03 AM Darin Johnson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Apac
+1 (binding)
On Tue, May 24, 2016, 5:27 PM Andrew Purtell wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Daniel Gruno
> wrote:
>
> > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on
> > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato.
>
+1 (binding)
On Mon, May 23, 2016, 6:23 PM Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
> to call a VOTE
> on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PredictionIO
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Pr
s CI on the GitHub mirror is fine (flag set to build only if
> .travis.yml file is present)
>
> Initial Committers
>
> Keith Turner (kturner at apache dot org)
> Mike Walch (mike.walch at ptech-llc dot com)
> Corey Nolet (cjnolet at apache dot org)
> Christop
proper (e.g: devicemap). I'm going to assume that will
be or can be modified once the site is set up properly.
[export]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/cms/webgui/content/export.json
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 9:55 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
>> Drew,
>>
>&
permutations of cms.apache.org weren't
useful. It doesn't appear that there is
(podling).staging.incubator.apache.org, where the staging version of
the site can be viewed. This leads me to believe that publishing the
podling site is managed independently from the incubator site proper.
Drew
John,
I just took a quick look at this. It appears the options are svnpubsub
or Apache CMS. For CMS, you have a choice of 'cms build type':
default-perl, maven, ant, or shell.
It sounds like you want Apache CMS, do you have any thoughts about the
'cms build type' option?
ake
one of the assignments for folks that have two.
Drew
--
Drew Farris
drew.far...@gmail.com
d...@apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hi All,
I'm interested in helping out as an incubator shepherd, is it just a matter
of adding myself to shepherds.json?
Drew
--
Drew Farris
drew.far...@gmail.com
d...@apache.org
at what needs addressing is already in the
pipeline, IMO.
Thanks,
//drew
>
> The IPMC's view of binaries is clear, and the IPMC believes that its
> views reflect the will of the board. 'Official' binaries, like
> binaries signed with a certificate with the Foundation'
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 17:01 -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:03 PM, drew wrote:
> > Well, for myself, I don't have a problem with the AOO project not having
> > official binary releases - in such a circumstance I would strongly
> > prefer no bin
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 17:01 -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:03 PM, drew wrote:
> > Well, for myself, I don't have a problem with the AOO project not having
> > official binary releases - in such a circumstance I would strongly
> > prefer no bin
s not to
> have gone this direction, though.
>
> Marvin Humphrey
Hi Marvin,
Well, for myself, I don't have a problem with the AOO project not having
official binary releases - in such a circumstance I would strongly
prefer no binary release at all.
On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 16:01 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 3:55 PM, drew wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 15:42 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:59 PM, drew wrote:
> >> > On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 19:43 +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
&g
On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 15:42 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:59 PM, drew wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 19:43 +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
> >> On 23 Jun 2012, at 19:37, Nick Kew wrote:
> >>
> >> > Nor what appears on planet.apach
n fine, but I find it surprising.
>
hmm - I suppose you are correct, it shouldn't have the feather and
should have the incubator tab - right?
//drew
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 15:16 +0100, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, drew wrote:
> > Wondering if it is still appropriate, acceptable, to add myself to the
> > list of initial Committers
>
> Alas not,
Not a problem.
> now the proposal has been accepted, th
Hi,
Wondering if it is still appropriate, acceptable, to add myself to the
list of initial Committers at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODFToolkitProposal
Thanks much,
Drew Jensen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general
olunteers to be moderators for the lists?
Raising hand.
I'd be happy to help on that.
Best wishes,
//drew
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
voting:
>
> http://old.nabble.com/-PROPOSAL--ODF-Toolkit-for-Incubation-td32102643.html
>
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept ODF Toolkit for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to ODF Toolkit incubation
> [
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 16:59 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Drew,
>
> > Quick note: I'll be staffing the TDF/LibreOffice table at SELF
> > (Southeast Linux Fest) in Spartanburg, South Carolina this coming
> > weekend.
>
> I can't make it for this weeken
gt; > $25 thereafter.
> > >
> > > This also opens up the evening events Mon-Fri, which, if you're going
> > > to find yourself in Portland that week, might be fun to attend :-)
> > >
> > > Noirin
> > >
> >
> > Drew Jensen probab
; As I've said elsewhere, I would lobby our Board for an unsupported
> tarball of the granted code, under the ALv2. Let others pick it up and
> do whatever they'd like with it.
Well, for whatever it is worth - +1
Thanks,
Drew Jensen
-
e change.
Hello Joe,
Since this is my (almost) first email to this list:
Drew Jensen
- Started involvement with OO.o back around 2005.
- Primary focus was end user support/QA on the Base module.
- I am a member of the Document Foundation, primarily focused on
marketing efforts in North America t
To confirm that you would like
>
>d...@baseanswers.com
>
> added to the general mailing list, please send
> a short reply to this address:
>
>
> general-sc.1306959277.cflfnlgkmpmiejlhlofb-drew=baseanswers@incubator.apache.org
>
> Usually, this happens
Correction: I can add a comment just not in the header. The first place to put
an AL header is at the code block.
I can add it there.
Drew
-Original Message-
From: Drew Baird (Volt) [mailto:a-dre...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 12:09 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
s/stonehenge_m1_incubator_take4/
> >
> > The release vote on the stonehenge-dev mailing list resulted in
> > *nine* +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes.
> > +1 votes are from
> > *Drew Baird
> > *Chintana Wilamuna
> > *Paul Fremantle
> > *Ben Dewey
&
+1
Drew
From: Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:41 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator
The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while,
and we now
41 matches
Mail list logo
