:
was Richard Jacob/Germany/IBM
received
by
Ted Leung wrote:
> What is the exact licensing of pluto.jar?
It's not a *single* pluto.jar. The JARs pluto
generates are the portlet API JAR and the
reference impl. container JARs.
We are currently working on the licence.
In general we want to provide it royalty-free,
as-is, redistributable, etc.
Steven Noels wrote:
> Out of curiosity: what's the specific problem with pluto.jar? Who is
> still discussing stuff with lawyers (IIUC)?
That's me. The problem is that wsrp4j usese pluto *JARs*
which contain the portlet API classes and the JSR168 reference
impl. container. The code for these is n
dims wrote:
>#1 - The code for wsrp4j that we will get will have everything needed for
WSRP4J to work in a
>Tomcat/Servlet Container...Right?
right
>#2 - Later the JSR 168 reference impl may/can be extracted into a separate
project...Right?
yes, it will be the pluto project. Currently there is no
first off all sorry if I break the thread, but I subscibed a few minutes
ago.
Let me try to bring light into the wsrp4j proposal confusion:
We intend to donate two projects: pluto and wsrp4j (formally named charon).
pluto is the JSR168 (Portlet spec) reference implementation, wrsp4j is the
implemen
dims wrote:
>#1 - The code for wsrp4j that we will get will have everything needed for
WSRP4J to work in a
>Tomcat/Servlet Container...Right?
right
>#2 - Later the JSR 168 reference impl may/can be extracted into a separate
project...Right?
yes, it will be the pluto project. Currently there is no
first off all sorry if I break the thread, but I subscibed a few minutes
ago.
Let me try to bring light into the wsrp4j proposal confusion:
We intend to donate two projects: pluto and wsrp4j (formally named charon).
pluto is the JSR168 (Portlet spec) reference implementation, wrsp4j is the
implemen
