Re: [VOTE] Accept Blaze into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) .. Owen On Thursday, July 31st, 2025 at 8:34 AM, Becket Qin wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 6:35 AM Fanng fa...@apache.org wrote: > > > +1 non-binding > > > > Best, > > Xiaojing > > > > Furkan Kamaci furkankam.

Re: [DISCUSS] Blaze Proposal

I’m glad to see this project. It sounds exciting and fills an important need in the big data community. It would be interesting to see a comparison to Apache Ballista. .. Owen On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 20:55, Calvin Kirs <[k...@apache.org](mailto:On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 20:55, Calvin Kirs < wrot

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Gobblin (Incubating) as a TLP

Talking to Justin, although you removed the non-Apache logos from the Gobblin home page, he would still like you to start a discussion with trademarks to clarify what would be required to use them. That way, we'll know the rules going forward. Thanks, Owen On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 10:30 PM Abhis

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Gobblin (Incubating) as a TLP

> > direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Gobblin > > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the > > projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Gobblin > > Project; and be it further > > > > RESOLVE

Re: [VOTE] Recommend Apache Iceberg graduation to top-level project resolution to the board

y of the Apache Iceberg > Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Iceberg Project: > > * Anton Okolnychyi > * Carl Steinbach > * Daniel C. Weeks > *

Re: [VOTE] Graduate to a top-level project

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:44 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > I notice a few minor things that may need to be sorted out/dicussed: - You have only made two releases and the last one had some issue around > licensing and NOTICE files > Obviously the first release at Apache takes the longest as the cod

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.8.0-incubating RC2

+1 (binding) On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 8:56 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > Thanks, Justin. Can you be more specific about what you think isn't correct > in the NOTICE file? Our practice is to copy the entire notice of > third-party projects, if they exist. We don't do this for the boiler-plate > ASF NOTICE,

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Iceberg project for incubation

+1 (binding) On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:12 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Nov 13, 2018, at 9:10 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > > > +1 binding > > > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 11:09, Ryan Blue wrote: > > > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 9:06 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

I can represent ORC within the group. .. Owen > On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: > > Hi all, > > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics > because silicon companies are able to

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ranger Project from the Incubator - Resending with additional mail distro

+1 (binding) On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Balaji Ganesan wrote: > +1 Great to see the progress from the Ranger community. > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > > > +1 binding > > > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Ramesh Mani > wrote: > > > > > Dear Incubator members,

[VOTE] release of Metron_0.1BETA_rc7

+1 on the release. I tested: * The SHA and MD5 checksums are correct. * The GPG signature is correct. * The metron-streaming module builds and the unit tests pass. * The LICENSE and NOTICE file look correct. Things that should be improved before the next release: * The top level pom.xml

Re: svn commit: r1718228 - in /incubator/public/trunk/content: podlings.xml projects/metron.xml

="Incubator" startdate="2015-12-06"> > > + Metron is a project dedicated to providing an > > extensible and scalable advanced network security analytics tool. It has > > strong foundations in the Apache Hadoop ecosyste

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

With 10 binding +1's and 10 non-binding +1's and no -1's, the vote to accept Metron in the Apache Incubator passes. Thank you everyone. Binding +1's: Owen O'Malley Chris Nauroth Chris Mattmann Seetharan Venkatesh P. Taylor Goetz Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli Broc

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote: > Would like to know who in Cisco was asked actually. I am from Cisco and > can help. Debo, If you can help get an SGA signed that would be great. I don't have any contacts in Cisco, so I didn't have anywhere to ask. .. Owen

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I think that there was a still pending question of why not ask Cisco for an > SGA for cleanliness. The answer that I gave you on board@apache was that large corporations don't sign legal documents unless they perceive that they have more to g

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on > whether Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is > pasted below and is available on the wiki as well. > >

[VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted below and is available on the wiki as well. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetronProposal We've added a paragraph in the background section dis

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

de being forked? It doesn’t sound like > > > there is a community there. > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Chris > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Bertrand Delacretaz > > > Reply-To: "genera

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

r one would be interested in lending a hand as a contributor or > > committer - if that would be welcomed. > > > > > >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Owen O'Malley > wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> We'd like to s

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

Not that it changes the result, but I also voted +1. https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg52096.html .. Owen On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > This vote is now closed and passes with 17 binding +1 votes, 7 non-binding > +1 votes and 4 binding -1 vo

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

Thanks for the good suggestion, Bertrand. I've included your paragraph in the background section of the proposal. .. Owen On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > ...To avoid forking communities,

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi Owen, > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > ...The > > condensed version is that the original code base (OpenSOC) was created > by a > > company (Cisco) that put it on g

[DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

Hi all, We'd like to start a discussion proposing creating Metron as an incubator podling. The proposal is on the wiki here: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetronProposal I would call your attention to the background section in particular. The condensed version is that the original code base

Re: Adopting non-ASF AL projects (was Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal)

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > I'm trying to resolve Greg's "opt-out" response, vs Roy's "blessing of the > original authors" in the link to the archives Owen posted. I've always > assumed that the "blessing..." part meant that any non-ASF code base, even > ones under AL,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > -1 (binding) > I’d like to see the project start with CTR and use RTC only for specific > cases (like where tests must be modified, over X (1000 lines?) of code > added, etc. > > Ralph > > > > On Nov 24, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Henry R

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > -1 (binding) > I’d like to see the project start with CTR and use RTC only for specific > cases (like where tests must be modified, over X (1000 lines?) of code > added, etc. > > I must say I do find the part about achieving qual

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 11/23/15, 8:23 AM, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" > > wrote: > > > > >Alex, > > > > > >Please re-read my email. As I stated we don’t take code that > > >authors don’t want us to have. S

Resigning as HAWQ mentor

All, I'd like to resign as a HAWQ mentor. HAWQ will still have 5 mentors, so it should still be in good shape. Thanks, Owen

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 (binding) On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:42 AM, wp chun wrote: > +1 > wp_c...@hotmail.com > > > > On 10/23/15, 11:26 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" wrote: > > > > >+1 (binding) > > > > > >-Taylor > > > > > >> On Oct 23, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Manoharan, Arun > > >>wrote: > > >> > > >> Hello Everyone, > > >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Eagle incubator proposal

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I would suggest that Owen O'Malley has not had enough time to be a viable > mentor recently and should not be on the list of mentors. > I have been helping Kylin out and it is graduating, so I'm down to just Hawq. I'

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

> > > >>NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > > > >>Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Kylin Project", > > > >>be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Calcite from the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Sep 14, 2015, at 22:56, Balaji Ganesan wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Chris Nauroth > > > wrote: > > > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> --Chris Nauroth > >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin-0.7.2-incubating

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > (NOTE next time probably use sha512) I'd like to second the request for using sha512 and not including md5.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin-0.7.2-incubating

* Checked GPG signature and hashes. * Built and ran unit tests. * Checked that all java files had Apache headers. * All of the java files are in org.apache.kylin package. Only exceptions were in the atopcalcite module: * net.hydromatic.optiq.runtime * org.eigenbase.sql2rel Are those cla

Re: [VOTE] Accept REEF into the Apache Incubator

asm (BSD) > > * netty (Apache 2.0) > > * mockito (MIT) > > * junit (EPL 1.0) > > * slf4j (MIT) > > > > > > # Cryptography > > > > REEF will depend on secure Hadoop, which can optionally use Kerberos. > > > > # Required Resources >

Re: [VOTE] Argus as a new incubator project

With 10 binding +1's and 5 non-binding +1's and no -1's, the vote passes. Thanks everyone, Owen On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:34 PM, wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > > On 2014-07-23 22:32, Arun Murthy wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >>

[VOTE] Argus as a new incubator project

Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Argus as a new Incubator project. The proposal draft is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ArgusProposal, and is also included below. Vote is open for 72h and closes at 24 July 2014 at 10am PST. [ ] +1 accept Argus i

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

Thanks, Daniel. I'll add you to the proposal. .. Owen > On Jul 18, 2014, at 12:36, Daniel Gruno wrote: > >> On 07/18/2014 09:33 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> Sorry that should be "but I have not found one yet." >> >> >>> On Fri, Jul

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

Sorry that should be "but I have not found one yet." On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Henry Saputra > wrote: > >> when all PPMCs including mentors and committers are from same >> organizations

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > when all PPMCs including mentors and committers are from same organizations > Argus *does* have an external mentor. Jakob Homan is working at LinkedIn and has never worked at Hortonworks. I've been looking for a second external mentor, bu

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Establishing trust and a track record of inclusion and > openness will be essential for Argus to achieve your objectives, if I > understand them correctly. I encourage you to address concerns raised on > this thread about the complexion of

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > Have you considered reaching out to the Sentry community to see if they > would be interested in bringing Argus existing code base into Sentry? > We did consider it, but decided that the challenge of integrating the two distinct code b

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

; Apache > >> > Tez.) This position seems reasonable, and should naturally apply > here. If a > >> > project exits graduation with the same lack of PMC/committer > diversity with > >> > which it entered, this is in effect Apache-washing, in my opinion. A >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > HI, > > Just curious if you could give reference to "Apache encourages > disjoint teams to form independent projects, even when those projects > overlap in scope" statement ? > Henry, It generally comes from the "Community over Code,"

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Sean Owen wrote: The proposal just says it overlaps, and that it might be good have a > different group of people reimplement some of the same things. Is > there a real gap that people want to build to plug here with overlap > at the edges, or is the scope of the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Maybe we should start asking incubator project to try to build some > kind of momentum or community before going to ASF incubator. > Apache incubator is a great place for new projects to grow their community and diversity. Once a project is

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratosphere into the incubator

> > * d...@stratosphere.incubator.apache.org > > * priv...@stratosphere.incubator.apache.org > > * comm...@stratosphere.incubator.apache.org > > > > === Source control === > > We would like to use Git for source control and enable GitHib mirroring >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3

On further inspection, I see the header is there, but not at the top of the file. Please move it in a future release. -- Owen On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > +1 on the RC. I checked the signatures, looked for license headers, built, > and ran unit tests.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3

+1 on the RC. I checked the signatures, looked for license headers, built, and ran unit tests. For the next release, please add a license header to gateway-shell/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/gateway/shell/BasicResponse.java. On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Devaraj Das wrote: > +1 on the R

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Ambari from Apache Incubator

+1 for graduation (binding) On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Arun C. Murthy wrote: > > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Ambari from Incubator > > +1 for graduation (binding) > > thanks, > Arun > > > > On Nov 15, 2013, at 9:12 AM, Yusaku Sako wrote: > > > > This is a call for vote to graduate Ambari from A

Re: [VOTE] Accept Falcon into the Apache Incubator (was originally named Ivory)

+1 (binding) On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:54 PM, Srikanth Sundarrajan wrote: > >> [ ] +1 Accept Apache Falcon into the Incubator >> [ ] +0 Don't care. >> [ ] -1 Don't accept Apache Falcon into the Incubator because... >> > > > +1. Binding. > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > At least > in Hadoop ecosystem I know of no other project that provides a combined > bundle for the checksums. Have you looked at the Hadoop releases? http://www.us.apache.org/dist/hadoop/common/hadoop-1.1.2/ -- Owen

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb wrote: The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be > separate files for each hash type. > Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided. > In what way are they "wrong?" It is a perfectly well defined output format that is the preferred one

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tajo into the Apache Incubator

With 11 binding +1's and 5 non-binding +1's the vote passes. Jakob, can you start the process for setting up the project? Thanks, all. -- Owen On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 3:48 AM, Alex Karasulu > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > Just as an

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tajo into the Apache Incubator

cense, > > Version 2.0. > > > > > > = External Dependencies = > > > > The required dependencies are all Apache compatible licenses. The > following > > components with non-Apache licenses are enumerated: > > > > * Google Guava > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tez into Incubator

open > >source is > >tremendous, so there is a potential for a very large community. We believe > >that Tez's extensible architecture will further encourage community > >participation. > >Also, related Apache projects (eg, Pig, Hive) have very large and active > &g

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Apache Open Climate Workbench into the Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > This VOTE has passed with the following tallies: > > +1 > > Chris Mattmann* > Andrew Hart* > Daniel Gruno > Paul Ramirez* > Gary Martin > Ross Gardler* > Ted Dunning*

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Knox Hadoop Gateway Project into the Incubator

o is an ASF project and has been classified Export > Commodity Control Number (ECCN) 5D002.C.1. More information on the > Apache Shiro classification can be found at > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shiro/trunk/README > > Required Resources > > Mailing lists > > knox-dev

Re: [VOTE] Graduate HCatalog from the incubator and become part of Hive

+1 (binding) On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > +1 Binding. > > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Alexander Alten-Lorenz > wrote: > > > +1, non-binding > > > > - Alex > > > > On Feb 5, 2013, at 10:06 AM, Sushanth Sowmyan > wrote: > > > > > And my axe! Erm... I mean, my +1. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.2-incubating (Candidate 5)

On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Joe Stein wrote: > I would like to keep the vote open for another few days to give the IPMC > members time to review and vote, thanks. Joe, Could you update your gpg key: * set it in id.apache.org * get someone who knows you to sign it. WIthout a signed key t

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: Drill is a distributed system for interactive analysis of large-scale > datasets, inspired by Google’s Dremel ( > http://research.google.com/pubs/pub36632.html). > This sounds really interesting Ted and I would love to help you. Would it be ok t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HCatalog 0.4.0-incubating

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > Hi, > > Please vote for releasing Apache HCatalog 0.4.0-incubating. > > rc6 for this release has passed a PPMC vote and is now advancing to an IPMC > vote. +1 (binding) verified sigs, checked rat, and compiled. --

Re: Ambari Status

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: Also, I noticed that ddas signed off on it as a mentor.  I don't see him listed >>as an Apache member or IPMC member. >>> >>> He was added to the IPMC. The message from Noel was dated 6 Oct 2011. >> >>Note: he is currently li

Re: Ambari Status

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Sounds like the project community still needs to learn how to develop > code out in the open. The massive revision 1335750 [1] seems to have > been based on no open discussion on the mailing list or the issue > tracker. There is a new code b

Re: Ambari Status

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: > In reviewing the Amabari report, I have a couple of notes/concerns: > >  * The community IMHO is in serious risk of failure to launch.  A recent code > change has sparked project interest, but list activity was non existent after > Ja

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> They are proposing adding Hue, which is a Apache licensed project on >> Github. > > Does Hue match the guidelines in http://www.apache.org/legal

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Bruno Mahé wrote: >>... > > It seems that we're talking about this location: >  http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/bigtop/bigtop-0.3.0-incubating/ > >> Again, we don't distribute non-Apache software, > > I didn

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Giraph to a TLP

With 4 binding +1's from the IPMC, I'll add the resolution to the board agenda. -- Owen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> >>>> I don't understand the BigTop use cases >>> >>> Perhaps thi

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Now (again IIUC) the interesting bit is whether it's better for BigTop > to be repackaging and -distributing upstream components by itself, or > if it would in fact be better for BigTop to simply provide something > like "bigtop-x.y.rpm" and

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> I don't understand the BigTop use cases > > Perhaps this preso can help a bit: >    http://people.apache.org/~rvs/apache-bigtop2.pdf Notes from this presentation: * 100% Apache Bigdata management distribution * Bigtop is a distribution f

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > It's not the job of the incubator to create new rules, but rather to > help podlings to graduation while following existing Apache > guidelines. We aren't making new rules. We are trying to help the Bigtop project understand the rules about no

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Bruno Mahé wrote: >> >> As a mentor of the Bigtop project, I don't see it as acceptable for an >> Apache project to distribute binaries of non-Apache software. If the >> owners of the Hue project decide to donate it to Apache and it had >> been released by Apache,

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler > wrote: >> So you are suggesting expanding the charter to include projects not hosted >> at Apache? > > I don't think this is what Bruno suggested. Personally I can't find > any refer

Re: Giraph status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "April2012" by OwenOmalley)

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the report, Giraph! > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Apache Wiki wrote: >> + Next steps: >> + * Another incubator release >> + * Adding new committers > > Looking at the report and recent project activity it looks like

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo to join the Incubator

tp://incubator.apache.org/accumulo/ >   * wiki at http://wiki.apache.org or http://cwiki.apache.org > > == Initial Committers == >  * Aaron Cordova (aaron at cordovas dot org) >  * Adam Fuchs (adam.p.fuchs at ugov dot

Re: Other mentors for accumulo?

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > I've signed up myself, too. I'll sign up too. -- Owen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@i

Re: [VOTE] Change the name of the HMS podling to Ambari.

With 8 +1's and no -1's, the name change passes. -- Owen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo for the Apache Incubator

On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Adam P Fuchs wrote: The project looks interesting. > I believe the answer is yes regarding the code grant, and I am currently > confirming that with our lawyers. We'll get you an official answer early next > week. Great. I know that the US government has its ow

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo for the Apache Incubator

Is the NSA going to file a code grant for the project? How deeply embedded are the LGPL dependencies? Are they optional components or mandatory? Thanks, Owen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org F

[VOTE] Change the name of the HMS podling to Ambari.

When I was doing the initial trademark search for HMS, I found that there are a lot of projects (including software) named HMS. It also has the problem of being very bad to search for (42.7m hits on google). Before I go through and create the infrastructure for Apache incubator, I wanted to discus

Re: [VOTE] Accept HMS as an incubator project

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Devaraj Das wrote: > Hello everyone, > This is a vote proposing that HMS be accepted as a project in the Apache > Incubator. HMS is monitoring, administration and lifecycle management > project for Apache Hadoop clusters. The latest proposal is pasted at the end >

Re: [VOTE] Giraph to join the incubator

+1 (binding)

Re: [VOTE] Release HCatalog 0.1-incubating (RC1)

Ok, I've verified the key, signature and md5. All of the unit tests passed. +1

Re: [VOTE] Release HCatalog 0.1-incubating (RC1)

Can you upload the pgp key that signed the release to mit and put it on apache? -- Owen

Re: [PROPOSAL] Proposing Giraph for the Apache Incubator

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Avery Ching wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose Giraph as an Apache Incubator project. Obviously, I'm +1 for this. *smile* -- Owen

Re: [PROPOSAL] Bigtop for the Apache Incubator

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Tom White wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose Bigtop to be an Apache Incubator project. > Bigtop is a project for the development of packaging and tests of the > Hadoop ecosystem. The goal is to do testing at various levels > (packaging, platform, runtime, up

Re: Hadoop related Incubator projects

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > There are some which indicate that their sole impediment to graduation is > community size. Has there been any consideration of the Hadoop TLP picking > them up as sub-projects? Wow, the wheels turn. The Hadoop PMC was strongly encoura

Re: Basing Apache releases on releases from incubating projects

On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: It is common for podlings to import their code here and only then start cleaning up dependencies that do not comply with ASF requirements. So if another project release contains unreleased code from a podling, it might not be clean. In ge

Basing Apache releases on releases from incubating projects

In http://bit.ly/fhCxIt , Steve argued that it isn't permitted for non- podling releases to depend on the artifacts that come out of podlings. I believe that to be false, but I can't find a relevant statement in the FAQ. Can I get clarification? Thanks, Owen -

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gora into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Thrift 0.3.0 RC6

On Aug 2, 2010, at 11:37 AM, Bryan Duxbury wrote: Owen - I'm not sure I understand what you mean, particularly because your link doesn't work. *Sigh* You'd think that the 5 billion times that I'd typed the Hadoop subversion URL that I wouldn't mess it up any more. http://svn.apache.org/

Re: Thrift 0.3.0 RC6

On Jul 28, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Bryan Duxbury wrote: The GPG signature can be found at http://people.apache.org/~bryanduxbury/thrift-0.3.0-rc6.tar.gz.asc Shouldn't you make a KEYS file in subversion somewhere so that people

Re: [Result][Vote] Move Chukwa to incubator

is Douglas, Greg Reddin Option 3) Bernd Fondermann Owen O'Malley +1 on proposal Sorry, I meant to vote for option 2. I think that it would be good to have more visibility in before they become a TLP. They also need to figure out how to add new committers to their pro

Re: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator

On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:29 AM, Eric Yang wrote: Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache incubator. The proposal is posted at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal +1 - To unsubscribe, e

Re: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator

On Jun 21, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: Chukwa has been around for a while now and from my (albeit limited) impression, pretty successful. What's the rationale for going the Incubator route rather than putting up a Board TLP resolution? Just wanted to check, thanks gu

Re: [VOTE] Should we accept Pig as a Hadoop subproject?

Owen O'Malley wrote: Should we accept Pig as a subproject? With six +1's from the Hadoop PMC, the vote passes. Hadoop will have a new subproject. *smile* -- Owen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For