Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Singa as incubator project

2015-03-10 Thread Olemis Lang
On 3/10/15, Thejas Nair wrote: > The Singa Incubator Proposal document has been updated based on > feedback in the proposal thread. > I do not know if this matters at all but JFYI , <> is considered as an obscene word by native Spanish speakers in quite a few regions . [...] -- Regards, Olemi

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Accept Twill for Incubation

2013-11-12 Thread Olemis Lang
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote: > Andrea, > thanks for the link, we did see that project but thought that it is not > relevant because it has not had any activity for 6 years, so it is probably > dead. > Should we be more concerned about this? > There is a continuation (fo

Re: [PROPOSAL] OData Proposal for Incubator

2013-06-17 Thread Olemis Lang
On 6/17/13, Klevenz, Stephan wrote: > Dear ASF members, > > We would like to propose the OData project to the Incubator. > > The OData Proposal is available at: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODataProposal > > We welcome your feedback and suggestions. > JFTR , at present there is an ongoing

Re: [podling setup] Bloodhound alternative for issues

2013-04-14 Thread Olemis Lang
On 4/10/13, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hi, > :) > we suggest using Jira or Bugzilla for new podlings: > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#template-issue-tracking > > But we have Apache Bloodhound, and they have an installed instance here: > https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound >

Re: Getting IPMC members to vote Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.4 (incubating)

2013-01-24 Thread Olemis Lang
Hi ! On 1/24/13, Benson Margulies wrote: > [...] > > So, in my entirely personal opinion, this leaves two directions: more > volunteers or less projects. In the extreme, some would read this as a > reason to close the gates to new projects until we have proven > capacity. > Is there any chance t

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.2 (incubating)

2012-11-05 Thread Olemis Lang
On 11/5/12, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Joachim Dreimann > wrote: >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Is there precedent on releasing with less than three +1s from IPMC >> members >> if there are no 0s or -1s from anyone at all? > > Sorry, no. :'( >> We'd really like to estab