On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
>if IBM (and Rob) know of an IP issue in the code base
This is not a _if_ there is an affirmative public statement by Rob
that this the case
> The fact that there has been no such revelation has to be sufficient at this
> point.
But t
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>
>
>
>> PS: the specific svn revisions here are not the central point, the
>> point is the lack of any discussion/scrutiny on any of these followed
>> by the
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> I have no reason to believe that the remediation Rob speaks of has anything
> to do with any part of OpenOffice.org.
You mean except for Rob's own statement ?
"But one thing not to lose track of is that Symphony has done IP
remediatio
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> @Norbert,
>
> I don't see any mention of patent issues in that message.
it says:
"But one thing not to lose track of is that Symphony has done IP
remediation at many levels. Where we've worked around things, we'll be
able to contribute
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
> I think you are just trying to find some silly excuse to complain
> about code that *you* clearly didn't write or own. All the code
> either from version control or bugzilla was provided by Oracle
That is not what was said in the ooo-dev l
I trust that the Patent issues raised by Rob Weir on this mailing-list in
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3cof1a1f1f97.0ba57c1e-on852578a4.004ec606-852578a4.004fc...@lotus.com%3E
have been disclosed and addressed to the satisfaction of the IPMC ?
Norbert
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> On 05/01/12 12:20, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> For larger contributions, an ICLA (or an SGA) is in order. Ditto for
>>> smaller ones, if there are questions/concerns. Remember, any
>&
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
[...] their downstream code cannot be used. Hence, the best outcome
under the current licensing regime is for all core development to be
done here, and for TDF to be a downstream consumer.
Just because you choose a particular license that d
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:37 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 6/7/2011 3:17 PM, Simon Brouwer wrote:
>> The OpenOffice.org installation packages contain code from a considerable
>> number of
>> "external" libraries (i.e. third party ones that are developed in their own
>> projects, not
>> copy
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> The problem here is that Rob and Sam and other well-known employees are being
> addressed as IBM employees here
I perceive Sam answers and arguments to be consistent with the 'I am
an individual member of Apache' position. I may disagr
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:08 PM, wrote:
> But I am very very very concerned that this conversation is starting to
> cross over into a "division of market" conversation, which has stiff
> penalties under US and international competition law. Open source work,
> like standards, is work done volunta
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Ian Lynch wrote:
> I can see why some might read into those statements implications that
> probably were not intended. That is the problem with perspectives :-)
I used these quote to illustrate that and to put that in parallel with
the complaint about Michael Meeks
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, got that wrong I see now
>> http://www.networkworld.com/community/apache-president-jim-jagielski-talks-openoffice-org
>>
>> Which is no problem for me, but obviously I misun
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:25 PM, wrote:
> Cor Nouws wrote on 06/03/2011 06:14:56 PM:
>
>> I would love to see all work in one big project - read all my pleas in
>> the OpenOffice.org time. But reality tells me that is not going to
> happen.
>>
>
> I would like to see this as well, everyone workin
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> This is why, inside the ASF, we expect individuals to represent the
> communities interests not their commercial or their employers interests.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary
depends upon his not underst
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:07 PM, wrote:
> Michael Meeks wrote on 06/02/2011 08:57:27 PM:
>
>>
>> - $scripts_dir/merge-log -p LIBREOFFICE_CREATE.. >$outdir/all-lo.log
>> + $scripts_dir/merge-log --all --since='2011-01-03'
>>$outdir/all-lo.log
>>
>> Show 'active' contributors by affiliati
16 matches
Mail list logo
