On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:07 PM, <robert_w...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Michael Meeks <michael.me...@novell.com> wrote on 06/02/2011 08:57:27 PM: > >> >> - $scripts_dir/merge-log -p LIBREOFFICE_CREATE.. >$outdir/all-lo.log >> + $scripts_dir/merge-log --all --since='2011-01-03' >>$outdir/all-lo.log >> >> Show 'active' contributors by affiliation - ie. at least one patch >> contributed in the last six months like this: >> >> Employers with the most hackers (total 214) >> (Unknown) 138 (64.5%) >> Oracle 45 (21.0%) >> Novell 18 (8.4%) >> Known contributors 7 (3.3%) >> Canonical 4 (1.9%) >> Redhat 2 (0.9%) >> > > If I'm reading this correctly, you're quoting the Oracle developers as > being contributors to LibreOffice? That is not particularly useful for > project planning purposes. Perhaps the core count for Oracle is closer to > the mark, if we extract only that out.
You are not reading this correctly, but more importantly the point is that this contradict your claim earlier: On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 15:34 -0400, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote: > When I check the commit logs for LibreOffice and apply the Apache > criteria for what defines an "active" participant (a commit within > the last 6 months), I see only 54 names. Everybody is entitled to their own opinions... but not their own facts. Norbert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
