-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
dIon Gillard
Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
dIon Gillard
Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit.
ROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
dIon Gillard
Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
who discussed it previously, but this is the first time
it caught my eye. Sorry i missed the initial discussion.
Would have been nice to caught this earlier.
+1.
Mvgr,
Martin
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 4/23/07, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 4/23/07, P
Bulgaria.
Public PGP Key at:
http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9
Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9
--
dIon Gillard
Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit.
-
To unsu
On 4/23/07, Petar Tahchiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/23/07, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok,
>
> other than the issue of what the actual grant is, I have some other
> questions on the IP clearance:
>
> - Under Copyright, there's an
://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/jakarta-cactus-tahchiev.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
dIon Gillard
Rule #131 o
, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
dIon Gillard
Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You mean like this:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/IRC+Log+Design+Discussion+26+May+2005
On 8/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jan Blok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What could be the problem of any real-time communication medium usage
> between some community members as long a
On 8/14/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Steve Toback wrote:
>
>> The Lokahi community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
>> Lokahi M01.
>
> I see that Yoav voted +1, but neither Bill Stoddard nor William Rowe. Were
> there reasons for tho
This seems a little ridiculous.
What point is there in having something incubated if there are no users?
What sort of a community would it be that didn't accept feedback and
evolve based on that feedback?
How many users are willing to wait 6+ months to use something just
because it is undergoing
Are documents like
https://www14.software.ibm.com/iwm/web/cc/earlyprograms/websphere/soawas61/
supposed to mention that a project is in the incubator?
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
"If you even dream of beating me you'd better wake up and apologize" -
Muhammad Ali
-
The referenced web site has the following:
"Organizational acceptance of responsibility for the project
* Has the receiving PMC voted to accept it? In Progress
"
Is this up to date?
On 7/4/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Someone pointed out to me that the original $subject mi
Both these statements mention that all *active* committers have a CLA
on file. What about IP from non-active committers?
On 11/7/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Maven community has voted to consolidate by bringing two related
> codebases into the main Maven project.
>
> B
Is there a reason we can't reuse the existing repository at
http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/ ?
In your example, Eclipse could be configured to check
http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/axis/jars/ for an update?
On 5/3/05, Jeffrey Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want
Clinton,
instead of dropping the database for tests, could you use something
like dbunit which can help set the state of the db consistently in
testing.
See http://dbunit.sourceforge.net for details.
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:33:17 -0700, Clinton Begin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, but I kno
I'm not a PMC Member, but here's my non-binding +1.
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:36:13 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The MyFaces team has worked through the incubation checklist in a open and
> collaborative fashion. The community remains strong, and the team has
> prepared a new rel
+0
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:52:39 -0700, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is the current text of the JCR proposal from
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JcrProposal
>
> Please cast your vote as +1 (yes), -1 (no), or something in between.
> Vote ends 12pm (Noon) PDT -0700, S
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 22:52:44 -0600, Clinton Begin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> See: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IbatisProposal
>
> [ ] Accept iBATIS into the Incubator
> [ ] Reject iBATIS
>
> Vote ends 12pm (Noon) EDT, Thursday August 26, 2004.
+1 from me. iBATIS seems a good fit.
--
ht
additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
20 matches
Mail list logo
