+1 (binding) overall. Looked through the src tarball.
* Checked LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER
* Hashes match
* Signature matches
* Incubator naming, no binary files (other than images)
For future releases: the src tarball extracting to the current
directory was surprising. The top-level INSTALL file
+1 (binding) -C
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Bill Graham wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Based on the discussion on the incubator mailing list[1] I would like to
> call a vote to add Heron to the Apache Incubator.
>
> The full proposal is available below, and is also available on the Apache
> Incubator wiki
+1 (binding) -C
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Suma Shivaprasad wrote:
> Dear Incubator members,
>
> Following the discussion in Atlas community on graduating Apache Atlas from
> incubation to a Top Level Project, starting this voting thread within
> the incubator
> community. Apache Atlas enter
+1 (binding)
Verified checksum/signature; LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER look good. -C
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Bolke de Bruin wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC’ers,
>
> The Apache Airflow community has voted and approved the proposal to release
> Apache Airflow 1.8.0 (incubating) based on 1.8.0
+1 (binding) -C
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Jitendra Pandey
wrote:
> Dear All,
>I would like to call a vote for accepting "Ratis" for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator.
> The full proposal is available below, and is also available at this wiki link.
>https://wiki.apache.org/incub
+1 (binding) -C
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a
> VOTE on accepting Hivemall into the Apache Incubator.
>
> [] +1 Accept Hivemall into the Apache Incubator
> [] +0 Abstain.
> [] -1 Do not accept Hivemall into the A
+1 (binding) -C
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting
> DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator.
>
> [] +1 Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator
> [] +0 Abstain.
> [] -1 Do not accep
+1 (binding) -C
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Omid as
> a new Incubator project.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Omid into the Incubator
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Omid
> [ ] -1 Do not accept Omid because ...
>
+1 (binding) -C
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal
> and the feedback so far seems to be positive.
>
> Please vote to accept Quickstep into the
+1 -C
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> I understand the concern, so let me try to offer some facts and see if we can
> make progress from there.
>
> Omid has been around for some time now, and its initial design appeared in a
> couple of research papers that I actual
+1 (binding) -C
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> OK the discussion is now completed. Please VOTE to accept Joshua
> into the Apache Incubator. I’ll leave the VOTE open for at least
> the next 72 hours, with hopes to close it next Friday the 5th
+1 (binding)
- Checksum/signature match (may want to collect these in a project KEYS file)
- LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER lgtm
May want to bump the Hadoop version in a later release, to pick up bug
fixes after 2.7.0 (latest is 2.7.1, 2.7.2 should be released soon). -C
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:41
RTC is regulation. That's not a synonym for control when it's
conflated with suspicion of people. Regulation is a set of deliberate
checks on a system.
Good regulation estimates (or reacts to) a system's natural excesses,
then attempts to constrain existential threats. It isn't a lack of
trust, bu
+1 (binding) -C
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to
> call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is
> pasted below and also available on the wiki at:
> https://wi
+1 (binding) -C
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> Hi -
>
> The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's been
> sufficient opportunity for discussion around our proposal to bring Impala
> to the ASF Incubator.
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on that pro
Wang
> * Andrew Chung
> * Youngseok Yang
> * Gyewon Lee
> * Taegeon Um
> * Joo Seong Jeong
> * Geon-Woo Kim
> * Mariia Mykhailova
> * Shravan M Narayanamurthy
> * Dongjoon Hyun
> * Sergiy
+1 Agree entirely. -C
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>> Correct. It is a tool, but not a requirement (at least not yet).
>> And since I repeatedly suggested this tool on this thread let me explain why.
>
> An
[VOTE] thread.
>
> Markus
>
> On 2015-11-02 13:56, Chris Douglas wrote:
>> +1 (binding) -C
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Markus Weimer wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the Apache REEF podling has discussed[0] and voted upon[1] graduatio
* Yingda Chen
> * Julia Wang
> * Andrew Chung
> * Youngseok Yang
> * Gyewon Lee
> * Taegeon Um
> * Joo Seong Jeong
> * Geon-Woo Kim
> * Mariia Mykhailova
> * Shravan M Narayanamurth
+1 -C
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The Kalumet community has voted to retire:
>
> http://s.apache.org/fP
>
> This is a vote of the IPMC to confirm the decision to retire the podling.
>
> [ ] +1 to retire Kalumet from the incubator
> [ ] -1 to keep Ka
+1 (binding)
Verified checksum, signature, and NOTICE/DISCLAIMER/LICENSE. Built
from source, skimmed deps and checked projects I didn't recognize for
license compat e.g., Tukaani (public domain). -C
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Mariia Mykhailova
wrote:
> The Apache REEF PPMC has voted to rel
trick on me today and not
> allowing me to see what I type.
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
> On 10/09/2015 08:03 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
>> What problem does this solve?
>>
>> This proposal lacks context. It implies that mentors are not neutral,
>> and that
What problem does this solve?
This proposal lacks context. It implies that mentors are not neutral,
and that they are motivated by interests not shared by the ASF. But it
does not outline the merits of that belief, neither does it specify
how this proposal would address them. Instead of allowing t
+1 -C
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier:
>http://s.apache.org/Gaf
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting HAWQ
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HAWQProposal
+1 (binding) -C
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 7:48 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> Following the discussion thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE for
> Accepting Apex as a new Apache Incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available on the wiki [2] and is also attached below.
>
> The VOTE will be open fo
+1 (binding)
Checksum/signature match
Checked NOTICE/LICENSE/DISCLAIMER
Built package target successfully
Checked RAT
-C
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Brian Cho wrote:
> The Apache REEF PPMC has voted to release Apache REEF 0.12.0-incubating
> based on the release candidate described below.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> If by this you mean the Incubator has taught the podling what it needs
> to know, and the podling is following the best practices of the Apache
> Way, then we are in full agreement. I don't see the need to single me
> out here, I am not disagr
Daniel-
This has been discussed recently in graduations for Tez [1], Drill
[2], and other projects whose continued incubation serves no purpose.
They've completed a curriculum that clears their IP and introduces
them to the ASF's infrastructure, procedures, and culture. The project
must be open, a
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> As long as there's a human being in the loop reviewing what's going into the
> repo I don't think I've got any issues with the process.
The ASF needs to establish provenance. It can't do that if a committer
pushes code that was posted to
David-
In another conversation, you mentioned Crucible [1] as another tool
for code reviews. Is that a viable option?
Has anyone on the list had any experience using it? -C
[1] https://www.atlassian.com/software/crucible/overview/
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:56 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Tue,
+1 (binding)
Verified checksum, signature on src/bin. Built package target from
source. NOTICE/LICENSE/DISCLAIMER present, but I only did a cursory
check of the dependencies.
The DEPENDENCIES file at the top level of the source tarball is empty. -C
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Jaideep Dhok
+1 (binding)
Checksum, signature OK, DISCLAIMER/LICENSE/NOTICE look OK, compile
from source works but the package target broke for me. -C
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Venkatesh Seetharam
wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> This is a call for a vote on the Apache Atlas 0.5 incubating release.
>
> A vot
+1 (binding)
Verified checksum, signature, DISCLAIMER/LICENSE/NOTICE. Verified the
build (on Linux).
I also read through the dev@reef list to get a sense of the journey to
RC8. Kudos to the REEF community for taking such care with their
releases. -C
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Julia Wang (Q
+1 (binding) -C
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Amareshwari Sriramdasu
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is the call for vote for the following RC to be released as official
> ApacheLens 2.1.0-beta-incubating release. This is our second release.
>
> Apache Lens provides an Unified Analytics inte
+1 -C
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
>http://s.apache.org/Oxt
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubato
+1 (binding, reiterated from dev@lens) -C
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Amareshwari Sriramdasu
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is the call for vote for the following RC to be released as official
> Apache Lens 2.0.1-beta-incubating release. This is our first release.
>
> Apache Lens provides
+1 (binding) -C
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Adam Bordelon wrote:
> Hello friends,
>
> After receiving a positive response on the discussion thread, and even a
> new Mentor (Luciano), I would like to call a VOTE to accept Myriad into the
> Apache Incubator. I will end the vote after 7 days.
>
+1 (binding) -C
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> OK, discussion has died down on this thread. I was originally
> suggesting that the pTLP option may be best for this community,
> but after some discussions with the existing community of
> Asterix
+1; this is a pragmatic proposal. -C
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I think it would be fair to say that in the
> past month or so we've had a healthy amount
> of discussion around where to go next with
> IPMC/Incubator/Metors reform. A diverse
> set of view p
annual ritual is disruptive to that goal. -C
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> On Jan 21, 2015, at 3:39 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:03 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 20
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@apache.org > wrote:
> How is that different from pruning the current IPMC membership by
> removing inactive members?
Doing *that* would be straightforward. Take the set of mentors on currently
incubating projects, add the other ha
I agree with Andrew. Creating a sub-board of the most vocal members of
the IPMC distills its dysfunction.
But this doesn't require consensus. The proposals focus on identifying
the "true" members of the IPMC; clearly, the authors believe
themselves to be among the elect. So make a list of the IPMC
+1
Checksum and signature match, RAT OK, source tarball builds cleanly.
LICENSE/NOTICE lgtm, and I agree with Marvin w.r.t. the missing
DISCLAIMER (can be fixed in subsequent releases). -C
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote:
> The Apache REEF PPMC has voted to release Apache R
+1 for Chris's proposal.
Without diminishing the creativity applied to solving problems with
the incubator, perhaps the better solution is to trade those problems
for tractable ones. -C
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> And how could the below proposal return wi
jie, Martin, Roman, Garry, Chris Douglas
> Non-binding +1s x 7: Claudio, TJ, Robert, Roger, Danny, Jon, Yi
>
> Links to votes and discussions:
> http://s.apache.org/samzaGradResult
> http://s.apache.org/samzaGradDiscuss
>
> Samza has been incubating for a bit more than a
+1 (binding)
Verified signature and checksum, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, and LICENSE look
good (specifically, checked licensing for deps: jquery, bootstrap,
glyphicons, and fontawesome). Minor nits:
- the gradlew script and wrapper jar are missing from the top level
(referenced in docs; not sure whether
+1 -C
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
> positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
>
> Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
>
> Here is my [+1]
+1 (binding) -C
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We wrapped up the vote on the Apache Falcon dev list in which the community
> expressed its desire to graduate to a top-level project.
>
> The vote has passed with:
> 13 binding +1 votes
> 8 non-binding +1 v
t, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:03 AM, Tomer Shiran wrote:
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> This vote to graduate Apache Drill to a top-level project has passed
>>>with 9
>>> binding +1s and no -1s.
>>>
>>> Ted Dunning
>>> Jake Farrell
>>>
I haven't tracked Drill during its incubation, so I read through some
of the dev list, poked through the review board and JIRA, read from
the wiki, and brought up the sample through its 10 minute tutorial.
Drill seems to be a very approachable project. It has good docs
(particularly for developmen
+1 (binding) -C
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Sharad Agarwal wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread
> https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg45208.html
> I would like to call a Vote for accepting Lens as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is availab
+1 (binding) -C
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Srikanth Sundarrajan
wrote:
> Have generated a new release candidate for Apache Falcon 0.5 post feedback
> from IPMC (Refer:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201409.mbox/%3CBLU179-W4635CB0EDA7F8C86C013E9A4CB0%40phx.gbl
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Sorry but it's -1 (binding) from me. Everything is good except that the
> jQuery has had an Apache license header added to it. (in
> ./html5-ui/js/jquery-1.11.0.min.js) If other incubator members think this
> isn't a blocker I'll change
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Would it be too much to ask to have YAML report *in addition*
> with the regular wiki?
Let's stick with one report. When the new format is ready, we can ask
podlings to learn it.
> We should be absolutely clear that it is auxiliary, but I
+1 (binding) -C
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 2:02 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> Apache Storm has been incubating since September 2014. Since then we have
> added 3 additional committers (with another 2 approved and pending account
> creation), and performed two releases. The Storm community recently
t; * Yingda Chen
> * Tony Majestro
> * Beysim Sezgin
> * Boris Shulman
> * Russell Sears
> * Jung Ryong Lee
> * You Sun Jung
> * Dong Joon Hyun
> * Josh Rosen
> * Tyson Condie
> * Brandon Myers
> * Yunseong Lee
> * Taegeon Um
> * Youngseok Yang
>
+1 -C
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Argus as a
> new Incubator project.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ArgusProposal, and is also included
> below.
>
> Vote is
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> Chris, I know you are pretty overloaded at the moment with podlings, but
> would
> you be willing to be a mentor for Argus?
I don't have many cycles for this, but if it's a blocker for
incubation then I'll make time. -C
>> Initial committer
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> If an objective of a podding is to build a diversified community then perhaps
> it should be an explicitly defined graduation criteria? In fact, earlier I
> have
> raised exactly the same question about Tez but I don't think it ever be
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Again, why would code lose users? Remember we're talking
> about a situation of no releases here. Presumably those
> users who are comfortable building from the repo would
> just keep doing so. And since there was no release,
> what else i
were 5 IPMC votes from our mentors:
> - Alan Gates
> - Arun C. Murthy
> - Chris Mattman
> - Chris Douglas
> - Jakob Homan
>
> Now, I would like to ask the IPMC to vote for the graduation of Apache Tez.
>
> Please VOTE to indicat
I'll detail why I think Tez is ready to graduate.
Nobody is concerned about its activity, relevance, or ability to
produce releases. So I won't belabor those points. Let's focus on
whether the Tez project is approachable as a project and as a
community.
Posting project plans and discussing them o
Tez is ready to graduate. Cos, if you can help us manage that process,
it'd certainly be appreciated. -C
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> I share the sentiment with NPanday - doesn't seem like anything is happening
> there really.
>
> If it of an interest to the incub
+1 -C
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote:
> Based on the results of the discussion thread (
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201404.mbox/%3CCA%2BFBdFQA4TghLRdh9GgDKaMtKLQHxE_QZV%3DoZ7HfiDSA_jyqwg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> ), I would like to call a vo
efforts - overriding my concerns or objections - then I'd be
> inclined to not view Apache as a particularly good steward of my community
> development. The devil is in the details, which takes me back to the point
> made in the above paragraph.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> If not part of the initial proposal, then
> at least making a good case as a criteria for graduation, and writing up
> related work and how the new project differentiates could be an initial
> task done on JIRA after acceptance along the line
+1 -C
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
> (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
> http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
>
> I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this ha
+1 (binding) -C
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> Incubator-
>
> Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept DataFu as a
> new Incubator project.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DataFuProposal, and is also include
Subversion Directory
>
> Git is the preferred source control system: git://git.apache.org/samza
>
> Issue Tracking
>
> JIRA Samza (SAMZA)
>
> Other Resources
>
> The existing code already has unit tests, so we would like a Hudson
> instance to run them whenever a n
+1 (binding) -C
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> OK discussion has died down, time to VOTE to accept Spark into the
> Apache Incubator. I'll let the VOTE run for at least a week.
>
> So far I've heard +1s from the following folks, so no need for the
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
wrote:
> My guess is that since the wiki was down these slipped.
>
> I know that I plan on producing reports by end of week and getting them
> up there ASAP for my podlings.
Ah, right; those were added after the report was generated. I copi
Falcon and Tez reported in April. -C
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Folks,
>
> its reporting time and at the wiki are a lot of them missing!
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2013
>
> Ambari
> Blur
> DeltaSpike (hasn't it graduated?)
> Droids
> Falcon
> Hadoop De
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Your position is that the IPMC fails to supervise. The consensus of the
> IPMC is that this is not true. Otherwise, someone would be reading the
> monthly report and objecting to the failure to report 'failure' to the
> board.
"If your st
AT inmobi DOT com)
> * Shwetha GS (shwetha.gs AT inmobi DOT com)
> * Shaik Idris (shaik.idris AT inmobi DOT com)
> * Venkatesh Seetharam (Venkatesh AT apache DOT org)
> * Sanjay Radia (sanjay AT apache DOT org)
> * Sharad Agarwal (sharad AT apache DOT org)
> * Amareshwa
+1 (binding) -C
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Hyunsik Choi wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Tajo into the Apache incubator.
> The vote will close on Mar 7 at 6:00 PM (PST).
>
> [] +1 Accept Tajo into the Apache incubator
> [] +0 Don't care.
> [] -1 Don't accept
mmunity. We believe
> that Tez's extensible architecture will further encourage community
> participation.
> Also, related Apache projects (eg, Pig, Hive) have very large and active
> communities, and we expect that over time Tez will also attract a large
> community.
&g
project and has been classified Export
> Commodity Control Number (ECCN) 5D002.C.1. More information on the
> Apache Shiro classification can be found at
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shiro/trunk/README
>
> Required Resources
>
> Mailing lists
>
> knox-dev AT incubator
Checksum and signature match, NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER look in order.
+1 (binding), aside from a quick check: there are a few jars included
in the source tarball:
apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-src/ctakes-assertion/lib/med-facts-i2b2-1.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-src/ctakes-a
-0 on graduation into Hive.
>From the [DISCUSS] thread: http://s.apache.org/as9 , this sounds like
a compromise with members of the Hive PMC who see HCatalog as "a set
of wrapper APIs that make Hive's metastore and serdes accessible to
Pig and MR", so they question whether members of that communit
t; codebase.
> * Active relationships and possible cooperation with related projects and
> communities, including end user and scientific communities, CORDEX,
> NARCCAP, US NCA, IPCC, ESG, etc.
> * Active relationships and possible cooperation with existing Apache
> communities,
: general-return-39351-Masanz.James=mayo@incubator.apache.org
>> [mailto:general-return-39351-Masanz.James=mayo....@incubator.apache.org]
>> On Behalf Of Chris Douglas
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 3:45 AM
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc: ctak
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> No, the OpenNLP did not have any discussion about it with legal. We just
> came to the conclusion
> that its not worth spending time on these issues, when we can instead
> produce our own training
> data which is compatible with the Apache l
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Masanz, James J. wrote:
> Another question about the convenience binary -- can it include the models
> for which the training data cannot be shared with the community?
My guess would be no, but it sounds like the OpenNLP community studied
this in detail; have you
Infra asks for a "heads up" for large artifacts:
http://s.apache.org/5vz While these aren't over the limit, it might be
worth pinging them. To be clear, these models were trained on external
data, so they can't be regenerated? Are they packaged here for
convenience, or is this the primary mechanism
r Resources ===
> * Jenkins/Hudson for builds and test running.
>
> == Initial Committers ==
> * Adam Berry (amberry at yahoo-inc dot com)
> * Jeffrey Zemerick (jeffrrey at mtnfog dot com)
> * Evert Lammert
+1; this matches my understanding. -C
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> My understanding of mentor sign off is that all active mentors sign off,
> not just one. Lack of sign off means the mentor has been busy elsewhere for
> that quarter and feels unqualified to signoff.
>
> S
Members of the Apache Board-
The Apache Incubator IPMC has determined that the Kafka Project is
ready for graduation and requests its establishment as a TLP. Please
consider the following draft resolution at your next meeting.
Home: https://incubator.apache.org/kafka/
Vote by project: http://s.ap
The vote (http://s.apache.org/Rgw) started on 2012-10-26 has ended.
Results:
+1 Jakob Homan (IPMC)
+1 Alan Cabrera (IPMC)
+1 Chris Douglas (IPMC)
+1 Jukka Zitting (IPMC)
+1 Bertrand Delacretazn (IPMC)
With five +1 votes and no other votes, the motion passes.
The IPMC has approved this proposal
+1 -C
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> This is a call for a vote to graduate the Kafka podling from Apache Incubator.
>
> Kafka entered the Incubator in July of 2011. Since then it has added three new
> committers, encouraged a number of new contributors, and made two signif
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> This seems like it might be more at home at apache-extras.
That may ultimately be its fate, but building a community around these
tools is worthy of an attempt. This also shares many goals with
MRUnit. Collaboration or even merging with that
+1 (binding) -C
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 AM, kishore g wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to call a vote for accepting Helix for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator. I have pasted the full proposal below.
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1, bring Helix into Incubator
> [ ] +0, I don't care eit
+1 (binding) -C
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Joe Stein wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Kafka Incubator has passed the vote for 0.7.2 RC5
> http://www.mail-archive.com/kafka-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg04980.html
>
> I would like to call a vote now from the IPMC.
>
> This is the fifth candidate for the thi
that the persons listed immediately below be and
>hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>Apache Oozie Project:
>
> * Alan Gatesga...@apache.org
> * Alejandro Abdelnurt...@apache.org
> * Andreas Neuman
+1 (binding) -C
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> This is a call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache Incubator.
>
> Oozie entered the Incubator in July of 2011. Since then it has added
> two new committers and made two significant releases following the ASF
>
+1 -C
(sorry, wrong thread)
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion
> over the last few days has been quite positive.
>
> Please cast your vote
+1 -C
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> This is a duplicated attempt at sending this message, please ignore the
> previous message if it eventually arrives. There appears to be a hangup
> sending email from my apache email address via gmail.
>
> Abstract
>
> Drill is
much time do you think is reasonable to obtain
clarification? -C
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jun 22, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
>
>> Kevan-
>
> Hi Chris,
> Thanks for elaborating.
>
>>
>> Please appreciate that th
gt;>>> Snappy is on Apache License 2.0. So, our licenses should be covered.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jun
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On T
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Obeying dependency license provisions is not an ASF policy, it's a legal
> requirement. Fairness is immaterial.
>
> If you bundle the bits, you must deal with the licensing and you must get it
> right.
Sure, but that's not an issue here.
ou believe that
Kafka should go further, but the release violates no policy. -C
On Thursday, June 21, 2012, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2012, at 4:36 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
>
> > Great. We're not distributing the Snappy codec, so- according to the
> > reasoning of
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
