No. You have access to the same search functionality. Moreover, given the criteria that Kafka 0.7.0 was approved under, the burden of proof is on you to find references. Your musings on binaries are, as Martin pointed out, not legal arguments but preferences for clean downstream consumption. Even if I accept the goal, it is an insufficient reason for me to reverse my (binding) vote.
The "binary artifacts" you refer to are jars from ASF projects and artifacts properly cited in the NOTICE/LICENSE files. The release is sound. You are, of course, welcome to vote against it because you believe that Kafka should go further, but the release violates no policy. -C On Thursday, June 21, 2012, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On Jun 21, 2012, at 4:36 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > > > Great. We're not distributing the Snappy codec, so- according to the > > reasoning of board@, legal@, and the IPMC on the 0.7.0 release- the > > NOTICE and LICENSE files do not require updates. We're not starting > > from first principles at every release. > > Care to provide some reference for the board@, legal@ reasoning? > > --kevan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
