On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> - deadlock.netbeans.org: 6 VMs, used mainly for propagation of changes
> between team repositories and to the releases repository, including jobs
> for building community plugins (releases*-au) and jobs
+1 binding
On Thursday, November 26, 2015, Ted Dunning wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I think that forcing experienced community developers into one model or the
> other is unnecessary. Let them in as they would like.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Greg Stein > wrote:
>
> > -1 (binding)
>
+1 binding
On Thursday, November 26, 2015, Ted Dunning wrote:
> +1 binding
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Konstantin Boudnik > wrote:
>
> > Come to think of it a bit more, yes I am not satisfied with the outcome
> of
> > the CTR/RTC exchange in the project.
> >
> > Hence changing my v
Where is that template kept?
A.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Andrew Bayer
> wrote:
> > ...Would it be reasonable to add a section to the proposal template
> covering
> > i
Thanks - just wanted to make sure. =)
A.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > On Oct 13, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Andrew Bayer
> wrote:
> >
> > But - and I wanna be very clear that this is a hypothetical - if I were
> to
> > still have signi
es, things rarely go to a vote until the
> outcome
> > is already assured so looking for failed votes isn't very productive.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>> On Oct 13, 2015, at 3:59 AM, B
Would it be reasonable to add a section to the proposal template covering
infrastructural requirements/expectations?
A.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Andrew Bayer
> wrote:
> > ...Is
2015 at 9:59 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Andrew Bayer
> wrote:
> > ...Can we think of some examples in recent years of potential podlings
> getting
> > to the point of a serious DISCUSS thread but not making it to a vote?..
>
Forgot to add - and what criteria would make it acceptable to vote no?
A.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Andrew Bayer
wrote:
> This is a legitimate question - by my very rough count, we've accepted
> 25-30 podlings into the Incubator in the last year, and other than the
> Ja
This is a legitimate question - by my very rough count, we've accepted
25-30 podlings into the Incubator in the last year, and other than the
JavaX trainwreck, I'm having a hard time finding examples of potential
podlings we've declined to incubate. Some of that is certainly because it's
not easy t
I'd like to make a suggestion - after a podling graduates or is terminated,
the podling's mentors should be responsible for putting together a post
mortem report, or an exit interview, or whatever you want to call it. This
would cover the pain points in onboarding the podling, particular issues
hit
Argh, I forgot to vote over on the podling thread, so hey, I'll vote now!
RAT check passed, signatures check out, tags check out, could build from
source package.
+1 binding, IPMC, mentor.
A.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Cédric Champeau wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> The Apache Groovy PPMC has suc
Regardless, this is the wrong venue for such discussions. I apologize and
will bring my concerns up at the right list.
A.
On Apr 22, 2015 08:47, "Andrew Bayer" wrote:
> Ok, that's true, but the same person has been involved in both cases, so
> it's not a big l
Ok, that's true, but the same person has been involved in both cases, so
it's not a big logical leap.
A.
On Wednesday, April 22, 2015, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 22.04.2015 08:04, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> > I have to express a concern here - this sort of thing has happened befor
I have to express a concern here - this sort of thing has happened before
with the same person on a different ASF account. A pattern is forming.
A.
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Excellent answer.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Konstantin Boudnik > wrote
+1 binding - checksums and signature pass, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER and LICENSE
all look right, RAT passes. One minor quirk is that if you download
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/parquet/apache-parquet-mr-1.6.0-incubating-rc2/apache-parquet-mr-1.6.0-incubating.tar.gz.sha
through Chrome,
+1 binding.
A.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Ryan Blue wrote:
> Thanks for linking to the MR release thread, Jake!
>
> This is a good opportunity to remind people that the Parquet MR release
> vote is on-going and could use a little attention, too.
>
> Thanks!
>
> rb
>
>
>
> On 04/14/2015 0
Ok, I'll approve 'em.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> I don't.
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Andrew Bayer
> wrote:
> > Just making sure - others besides me are getting the subscribe moderation
> > emails?
> >
&g
Just making sure - others besides me are getting the subscribe moderation
emails?
A.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Jochen Theodorou
> wrote:
> > ...-subscribe@groovy.incubator.a.o ?
>
> of course yes, so
2)
>> * jarjar (ALv2)
>> * Checkstyle (LGPL)
>> * Cobertura (GPL)
>> * Gradle (ALv2)
>> * Asciidoctor (MIT)
>> * Simian (http://www.harukizaemon.com/simian/get_it_now.html)
>>
>> Test only dependencies:
>>
>> * Apach
One more time...
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Trying to get the vote monitor to pick this up...
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>
>> The vote has closed, and it has passed, with 5 binding IPMC +1s and 8
>>
This was cancelled ages ago, trying to get the vote status monitor to pick
it up.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is the first release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating,
> the first jclouds release at Apache.
>
> We are ca
This was cancelled ages ago, trying to get the vote status monitor to pick
it up.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is the second release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating,
> the first jclouds release at Apache.
>
> The PPM
Trying to get the vote monitor to pick this up...
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> The vote has closed, and it has passed, with 5 binding IPMC +1s and 8 PPMC
> +1s.
>
> +1 binding:
> - David Nalley (from PPMC vote)
> - Suresh Marru (from PPMC vote)
>
57 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Reminder - it'd be great to get more eyes and make sure we're not missing
> anything for graduation. Thanks!
>
> A.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>
>> argh, line breaks all vanished in weird ways. Here's
Reminder - it'd be great to get more eyes and make sure we're not missing
anything for graduation. Thanks!
A.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> argh, line breaks all vanished in weird ways. Here's a better format:
>
> The Apache jclouds project ent
itial members of The
Apache jclouds Project:
* Adrian Cole (adrianc...@apache.org)
* Andrew Bayer(aba...@apache.org)
* Andrew Gaul (g...@apache.org)
* Andrew Phillips (andr...@apache.org)
* Becca Wood (silky...@apache.org)
* Everett Toews (ever..
projects within the scope of
responsibility ofThe Apache jclouds Project; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be andhereby are
appointed to serve as the initial members of TheApache jclouds Project:
* Adrian Cole (adrianc...@apache.org) * Andrew Bayer
Happy to share the script - it was particularly useful for us given the
plethora of release artifacts, obviously. =)
A.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> + 1 (binding)
>
> JClouds PPMC,
>
> The release verification script is handy, should consider sharing it with
> genera
Hey IPMC -
Just a heads up that we are still looking for two IPMC votes on this
release - if you've got a chance, please give it a look. Thanks.
A.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Andrew Phillips wrote:
> Hi all
>
> This is the second release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.2-incubating,
> t
The Apache jclouds (incubating) team is pleased to announce the release of
jclouds 1.6.1-incubating.
This is the first Apache release of jclouds. Apache jclouds is a cloud
agnostic library that enables developers to access a variety of supported
cloud providers using one API.
The source archives
The vote is now closed, and with 7 +1s, 4 of them IPMC, Apache jclouds
1.6.1-incubating RC3 will be released.
Here are the votes:
PPMC binding:
- Andrew Bayer
- Ignasi Barrera
- Adrian Cole
IPMC binding:
- David Nalley
- Olivier Lamy
- Suresh Marru
- Jim Jagielski
Thanks, all!
A.
On Tue, Jun
;
> -sebastien
>
>
> On Jun 16, 2013, at 10:04 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This is the third release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating,
>> the first jclouds release at Apache.
>>
>> This is the IPMC vote. The PPMC
Hello,
This is the third release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating,
the first jclouds release at Apache.
This is the IPMC vote. The PPMC vote passed, with three +1s from mentors
(David Nalley, Olivier Lamy, and Suresh Marru).
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/j
Hey all -
Could I get write permission to the wiki, specifically for
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2013 and the like? Username is
AndrewBayer.
A.
Well, I've got the first three, and will bug coworkers in the GWOT to sign
my key next week. =)
A.
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I think that the RM _must_ have a key, that the key must be part of a
> KEYS file in svn/git, and that it _should_ be uploaded into their
>
an Cabrera wrote:
> How many binding votes are there from the PPMC vote?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On May 31, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This is the second release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating,
>>
Hello,
This is the second release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating,
the first jclouds release at Apache.
The PPMC has approved the release at this point, so this is an IPMC vote.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12324412&s
Ok, I've pushed changes that'll deal with the issues I mentioned below.
I'll wait another couple hours to see if anyone has any more feedback
before cutting the next RC, but I'm canceling the vote on this RC for
obvious reasons. =)
A.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Andrew
ce in labs, and anything
else that comes up. I'll cut another RC this afternoon PDT, once I've addressed
those problems and waited to see what additional issues are uncovered.
A.
On May 31, 2013, at 8:03 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Looks like jclouds-cli has a LICENSE.txt in its
" wrote:
> Just an observation:
> jclouds-cli-pom-1.6.1-incubating-source-release.tar.gz root has 2 LICENSE
> files?
> LICENSE and LICENSE.txt
> jclouds-labs-1.6.1-incubating-source-release.tar.gz root is missing
> LICENSE/NOTICE ?
>
>> -Original Message-
an exclusion, but we'd like to make sure we know what
can get away with not having a license header and what can't before we change
that.
A.
On May 30, 2013, at 7:41 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
...and fwiw, I'm +1, PPMC.
A.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> A couple other little fixes:
>
> The incubator-jclouds.git tag is actually at
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-jclouds.git;a=tag;h=d47a21038aafbc4d855444904e03ab1406b
;jclouds's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:" -
copy-paste fail!
A.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Whoops - the link was actually
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/jclouds-1.6.1-incubating-candidate-1/ -
> I've symlinked them to be
-incubating-rc1 resulted to
> 404?
>
> - Henry
>
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is the first release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating,
> > the first jclouds release at Apache.
> >
Hello,
This is the first release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating,
the first jclouds release at Apache.
We are calling this vote on both the IPMC and the jclouds PPMC at the same
time, as the code for this release has already been vetted by the jclouds
developers leading up to this R
A little belated, but I'd be interested in helping out as well.
A.
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Andrei Savu wrote:
> I think the proposal is now ready for voting. I will go ahead and start a
> new thread.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProvisionrProposal
>
> Thank you all!
>
> -- Andre
+1 - binary tarball looks right now.
A.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> This is the second incubator release for Apache Flume, version
> 1.1.0-incubating. We are now voting on release candidate rc1.
>
> *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours ***
>
> The li
fwiw, I really think
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1032should be addressed
before 1.1.0 is released. The binary artifact, while
just a convenience artifact, is rather incorrect.
A.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Just to be clear, although the version number d
+1 non-binding.
A.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This takes care of Patrick's RAT concerns. From now on you can run RAT by:
> $ mvn -Prelease install
> at the top level of a project. This is THE only change between RC1 and RC2
> and given how cosmetic it is I'd like
+1.
A.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > The tag to be voted on:
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.2.0-incubating-RC1/
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
Ah. I was expecting a comment. Sorry!
A.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 05:30:29PM -0700, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-43 and
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&re
Gav.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Andrew Bayer [mailto:andrew.ba...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, 26 August 2011 9:50 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org; ga...@16degrees.com.au
> Subject: Re: How to enable "Submit patch" for an incubating project?
>
>
>
> Also, ho
Also, how do we get JIRA/SVN integration turned on, so that commits with
JIRA ids in the comments will result in those JIRAs updating?
A.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: shaposh...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] On Beha
I fail at cut and paste - the Bigtop link should be
http://incubator.apache.org/bigtop/. Which will have a download link as soon
as mirrors update.
A.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The Apache Bigtop team is pleased to announce the release o
ecision making process have stabilized
in a manner consistent with other successful ASF projects. While
incubation
status is not necessarily a reflection of the completeness or stability of
the code, it does indicate that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by
the ASF.
Thanks!
Andrew Bayer
The vote has passed, with 8 +1s from Bigtop PPMC members, a non-binding -1
from a non-PPMC/IPMC member, and 3 +1s from Incubator PMC members.
+1 Andrew Bayer *
-1 Eric Yang
+1 Bruno Mahe *
+1 Roman Shaposhnik *
+1 Peter Linnell *
+1 Doug Cutting +
+1 Patrick Hunt *+
+1 Tom White *+
+1 Andre
jira for next rel)
> Natty doesn't install curl by default btw.
>
> Fix the status page and I'll change my vote (no need for new rc).
>
> Patrick
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Andrew Bayer
> wrote:
> > This is the first incubator release for
> using maven for releasing. In case you are this might be useful:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/empiredb/Release+Process
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Andrew Bayer
> wrote:
> > Was actually doing that as you wrote this. =)
> >
> > A.
> &g
urrently producing
> package name without reference to bigtop. The resulting artifacts can
> potentially overlap with project produced artifacts.
>
> regards,
> Eric
>
> On Aug 22, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>
> > This is the first incubator release for Apach
blergh, sorry about the date and the DISCLAIMER text. Fixing the DISCLAIMER
on trunk now. I've also done BIGTOP-26 on trunk. I'm honestly not sure about
the filter files - will check on that going forward.
A.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:30 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 22 August 2011 19:07,
...and I should add that I'm, again, +1 binding. =)
A.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> 0.1.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/R
This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
0.1.0-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
*** Please download, test, and vote by Thursday, August 24 (3 working days
from
ect to include RC2 please.
>
> Thanks!
> On 22 August 2011 16:26, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> > Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
> >
> > A.
> >
> > On Mon, A
2011 at 8:56 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Bayer
> wrote:
> > Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
> >
> > A.
> >
e)
> when the vote succeeds.
>
> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
>
> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
>
> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
>
> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew
Tag replaced.
A.
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> > New candidate up at
> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/.
> The
> > only files RAT still sees missing license head
for now, excluded
from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been built
with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
A.
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update t
p-dev/topics).
>
> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>
> Why is this not a .txt file?
>
> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb wrote:
> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please find
Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please find RC1
at http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
Website should update shortly.
A.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as w
Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files - I'll
open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the ones that
show up deeper are expected by the build process.
A.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Which source files ar
any
inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it out.
Adding DISCLAIMER now.
A.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> > 0.1
I'm not sure if I'm supposed to explicitly vote, but just in case:
+1 binding
A.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Personally, I'm fine with releasing so long as CentOS5 and Ubuntu work -
> anything else can be fixed/added in 0.2.0-incubating.
>
&
t of VMs at home and at work).
> I am booting up right now a bunch of VMs to ensure next patch won't
> break anything.
> Could we re-cut a rc after that patch?
>
>
> On 08/19/2011 11:25 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop,
This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
0.1.0-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
*** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working days
fro
75 matches
Mail list logo
