Given that we're not releasing binary convenience artifacts for this
release, would this be something that could be fixed in 0.2.0-incubating
rather than this release?

A.

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Eric Yang <ey...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> -1 non-binding, the package generation spec file are currently producing
> package name without reference to bigtop.  The resulting artifacts can
> potentially overlap with project produced artifacts.
>
> regards,
> Eric
>
> On Aug 22, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>
> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >
> > It fixes the following issues:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >
> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Thursday, August 24 (3 working
> days
> > from now)
> >
> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
> >
> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/<
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/>
> >
> > The tag to be voted on:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
> > (svn rev. 1160352)
> >
> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
> >
> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
> successful
> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > A.
>
>

Reply via email to