FYI - I prepared a patch "Mention that there is no implicit +1 in
votes" [1] to include this information.
Feel free to give it a review and improve the expression.
Best,
tison.
[1] https://github.com/apache/www-site/pull/338
Ayush Saxena 于2024年1月9日周二 20:56写道：
>
> > I may prepare a patch on
> h
Here is the thread on dev@opendal.a.o [1].
> only Xuanwo and I fix
We're in the final PMC anyway and I'm on vacation to spend my time and
energy handling issues I spotted.
So this topic is discussed and spread within dev@opendal.a.o. It's no
longer about whether it's "pointed out" or "proactivel
> the PMC is clear that they're responsible to fix them
... and they do fix them. All the fixes above are produced by PMC members.
> this can be an evidence that the PMC understands their responsibility
Somewhat I send the email so it's not totally active. But I believe
that the PMC members are
> Datastax has had recent issues regarding trademarks; please follow the
> policy, not what other 3rd party companies do.
Of course we should follow the policy primarily. The reference is
demonstrate what "adding trademark attributions" mean.
> However, they don’t seem to understand that they ar
Hi,
> Also, for trademark attribution, I understand the databend.rs, if it
> refers to OpenDAL, it should contain a Footer like Datastax does[2].
Datastax has had recent issues regarding trademarks; please follow the policy,
not what other 3rd party companies do.
I can see the project, from wha
> independently
Hello Justin,
After reading the trademark guide[1], I agree that the (P)PMC can
review the occurrence again since it clearly wrote:
> The first and most prominent mentions must use the full form: "Apache
> Hadoop®" of the name for any individual usage
and it gives a certain lis
