+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Ashvin
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:55 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 5:17 AM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Following the discussion in the incubator mailing list [1], I am starting
> > t
Hi Andrew
We did a similar move while ago for Apache Karaf (from Apache
ServiceMix, then Felix, then TLP :)).
AFAIR, you propose a resolution to the board with approval from PMC,
proposing a new PMC/committer set.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 4:06 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
>
> I apologize if
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 5:17 AM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Following the discussion in the incubator mailing list [1], I am starting
> this official vote for the XTable project.
>
> Here is the proposal -
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/I
Hi All,
Following the discussion in the incubator mailing list [1], I am starting
this official vote for the XTable project.
Here is the proposal -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/XTable+Proposal
Please cast your vote:
[ ] +1, bring XTable into the Incubator
[ ] +0, I don'
Thanks, Carl. Thanks also to all others that have chimed in expressing
their support, asking questions, and providing feedback. I'll be starting
the vote shortly.
-Jesús
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 7:32 PM Carl Steinbach
wrote:
> Please go ahead with the vote.
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 6:13 PM Je
Please go ahead with the vote.
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 6:13 PM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
> Your last message did not provide many details and we have not heard back
> from you after a day; I'd appreciate any updates or insights into
> your thought process that you could share.
Hi Carl,
Your last message did not provide many details and we have not heard back
from you after a day; I'd appreciate any updates or insights into
your thought process that you could share.
As JB mentioned, I see no reason to delay the vote to move into incubation.
Community growth is one of th
Looks like I missed the deadline for KIE, I'm sorry. I'll get one for next
month.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
For what it's worth, Arrow was created in Jan 2016 [1]. Here is the text of the
Board resolution.
Julian
[1]
https://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2016/board_minutes_2016_01_20.txt
---
7. Special Orders
A. Establish the Apache Arrow Project
WHEREAS, the Board of Di
Thank you -- I will proceed with a name search and work up a proposal draft
as next steps.
I am tracking this work in [1] for anyone who wishes to follow along.
[1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/8491
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 1:24 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> You could also look i
You could also look into how Solr was spun out of Lucene.
It would be up to your PMC whether to make the new PMC identical or not.
Doing a podling name search on
DataFusion does check a box for the board.
The best place to continue this discussion is bo...@apache.org
Best,
Dave
Sent from my i
Hi All,
+1 to JB's points. Thanks Jesus for steering this discussion.
I wholeheartedly support XTable. The potential of this initiative is
immense, especially considering feedback from storage formats users and the
benchmark we've been developing.
I'm eagerly looking forward to collaborating with
Thank you Julian. This is very helpful. I will review the archives.
Andrew
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 10:55 AM Julian Hyde wrote:
> I believe the process is for the Board to create a new PMC whose IP and
> PMC members are an exact copy of the parent PMC. (Like the Unix “fork”
> function.) And the
I believe the process is for the Board to create a new PMC whose IP and PMC
members are an exact copy of the parent PMC. (Like the Unix “fork” function.)
And then both PMCs delete the stuff, and PMC members, they no longer need.
Arrow itself was created via this process (from Drill). You could
Hi,
Within 7 days of voting, we have received 14 +1 binding and 6 +1 no-binding,
the vote passed.
Welcome Fury to the ASF incubator.
The vote details are as follows
Binding votes(+13):
- tison
- Xin Wang
- PJ Fanning
- Greg Stein
- Yu Li
- Furkan KAMACI
- Dave Fisher
- zhongyi tan
- Ayus
+1 (binding)
Best,
tison.
Goson zhang 于2023年12月15日周五 17:11写道：
>
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Good luck!
>
> Jun Liu 于2023年12月14日周四 22:25写道：
>
> > +1 non-binding
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jun Liu
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Dec 8, 2023, at 7:04 PM, tison wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Incubator
> > >
> > > Following the
I apologize if this is not the right list on which to ask this question.
Can someone point to information about the procedure to propose
“graduating” an *existing* sub project to a new top level project?
Specifically, we are working on a proposal to graduate the “Apache Arrow
DataFusion”[1] sub
Hi,
I think that's also the purpose of the incubation to grow the
community, both users community but also dev communities.
So, I don't see a blocker for incubation but more for graduation.
I would start with the initial committer list with the target to grow
during incubation, including people f
+1 (non binding)
Good luck!
Jun Liu 于2023年12月14日周四 22:25写道：
> +1 non-binding
>
> Regards,
> Jun Liu
>
>
>
> > On Dec 8, 2023, at 7:04 PM, tison wrote:
> >
> > Hi Incubator
> >
> > Following the discussion [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of Fury [1], I
> > am starting this official vote for the F
19 matches
Mail list logo
