Re: Is llvm exception allowed for incubator projects?

2023-10-23 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 4:59 AM Ivan I wrote: > > If my project uses “Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions” > LLVM Exceptions being: > LLVM Exceptions to the Apache 2.0 License > As an exception, if, as a result of your compiling your source code, > portions > of this Software are em

Re: Is llvm exception allowed for incubator projects?

2023-10-23 Thread Dave Fisher
The phrase Apache License with exception … is meaningless the ASF does not allow it under trademarks. Please email tradema...@apache.org for any clarification. If it’s not the Apache License then you can’t call it the Apache License + - or whatever. Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 23

Re: Is llvm exception allowed for incubator projects?

2023-10-23 Thread Xuanwo
> Then can i dual license under apache 2.0 and apache 2.0 with llvm > exception or that is also a no go? As mentioned under https://www.apache.org/licenses/ All software produced by The Apache Software Foundation or any of its projects or subjects is licensed according to the terms of the docum

RE: Re: Is llvm exception allowed for incubator projects?

2023-10-23 Thread Ivan I
On 2023/10/24 02:20:27 Xuanwo wrote: > Oh, sorry for misreading your mail. > > "The Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions" is acceptable as a dependency. However, all incubator projects are required to use the Apache License v2.0 without exceptions. > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2023, at 09:57, Iva

Re: Is llvm exception allowed for incubator projects?

2023-10-23 Thread Xuanwo
Oh, sorry for misreading your mail. "The Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions" is acceptable as a dependency. However, all incubator projects are required to use the Apache License v2.0 without exceptions. On Tue, Oct 24, 2023, at 09:57, Ivan I wrote: > If my project uses “Apache License v2

Re: Is llvm exception allowed for incubator projects?

2023-10-23 Thread Xuanwo
AFAIK, Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions is allowed to be used in ASF projects (including incubator projects). The exception allows for more flexible code reuse in specific scenarios, particularly those related to static linking. On Tue, Oct 24, 2023, at 09:57, Ivan I wrote: > If my proje

Is llvm exception allowed for incubator projects?

2023-10-23 Thread Ivan I
If my project uses “Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions” LLVM Exceptions being: LLVM Exceptions to the Apache 2.0 License As an exception, if, as a result of your compiling your source code, portions of this Software are embedded into an Object form of such source code, you may re

Re: [VOTE] Accept ResilientDB Into The Apache Incubator

2023-10-23 Thread Mohammad Sadoghi
Dear Christian Excellent. Thank you so much. Having a call over Zoom or Slack would be great to meet. I will have the core people on our end to join as well. Please let me know when would be a good time to meet. No particular questions besides what you would like us to prepare and provide at thi

Re: [VOTE] Accept ResilientDB Into The Apache Incubator

2023-10-23 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hello Mohammad, funny you ask right now, because I just updated some files before you sent your message. Your mentors, including me, will set up the project files. I added yours to the repo. You are visible here already (on the bottom): https://incubator.apache.org/ but the link doesn't work.

Re: [VOTE] Accept ResilientDB Into The Apache Incubator

2023-10-23 Thread Mohammad Sadoghi
Dear all, What would be our next step after the VOTE Result message? Our team is on standby to get the Podling procedure started. --- Best Regards, Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD Associate Professor Exploratory Systems Lab (ExpoLab) Department of Computer Science University of California, Davis ExpoLab:

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Pekko(incubating) gRPC 1.0.1-RC1

2023-10-23 Thread PJ Fanning
The vote passes with 4 bindig +1s. Vote Thread https://lists.apache.org/thread/nzz9pkozc833j8qf1z6xbk80j7v6vx29 Votes Ryan Skraba Ayush Saxena Matthew de Detrich PJ Fanning I will proceed with finalising the release and make the announcements. Thanks to everyone involved in the development and r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pekko(incubating) gRPC 1.0.1-RC1

2023-10-23 Thread Ryan Skraba
+1 (Binding) [X] Download links are valid. [X] Checksums and signatures. [X] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist [X] No unexpected binary files [X] Source files have ASF headers [X] Can compile from source I built, ran unit tests from the tar, and tested the Maven and Gradle plugins using the method des

Re: [VOTE] Accept Seata Into the ASF Incubator

2023-10-23 Thread Kent Yao
+1 (non-binding), good luck. Kent Eason Chen 于2023年10月23日周一 14:21写道： > > +1 (non-binding) > > Good luck! > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 11:24 AM Xin Wang wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Good luck! > > > > Xin Wang > > > > Jialin Qiao 于2023年10月23日周一 09:42写道： > > > > > +1, Good luck! > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pekko(incubating) gRPC 1.0.1-RC1

2023-10-23 Thread Ayush Saxena
+1 (Binding) * Built from source * Validated Checksums * Validated Signatures * Validated Disclaimer file exists. * Validated LICENSE & NOTICE file exists * Validated no code diff b/w git tag & src tar Thanx PJ Fanning for driving the release, Good Luck!!! -Ayush On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 18:40, P

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pekko(incubating) gRPC 1.0.1-RC1

2023-10-23 Thread PJ Fanning
Hi everyone, This vote has been open for a while but we still don't have enough votes to proceed. Would any of the Pekko mentors or Incubator PMC members generally have time to review this RC? We also have another vote open for Pekko Projection 1.0.0-RC1. The Incubator community's help is much