Thank you for taking the time to clarify, I apologise for misinterpreting your
email.
I should have reviewed our DISCLAIMER-WIP more thoroughly before replying: the
statement in question comes from our list and is not part of the template for
the DISCLAIMER-WIP. I will remove it and implement t
I wasn't suggesting skipping votes. I was very surprised to see that
statement in your disclaimer [1] and I think it should be removed and
that you should follow standard voting procedures.
I've re-read my email from before and am really surprised that it is
being misinterpreted as a call for Bare
I think we can close this vote. We will make the necessary changes and call for
a new vote for a third release candidate. Since we started the current release
process more than a month ago, I suggest we skip the vote for rc3 on the dev
mailing list.
I would also like to hear your thoughts on po
-1 (binding)
I had voted +1 on the dev list but I am changing my vote in light of the header
issues that Calvin discovered.
A typical java file in Baremaps has this header:
/*
* License
Hi,
sorry for my late check. I've been a little busy lately.
-1 (binding)
I checked:
- checked the asc and sha checksums
- incubating in the name
- LICENSE and NOTICE and DISCLAIMER-WIP present
- can build from source
- no unexpected compiled binaries in the source distribution
I don't have an
Hi IPMC,
Here is the IP CLEARANCE proposal[1] for accepting kvrocks_controller
as part of the Apache Kvrocks project
The voting thread within Kvrocks PMC can be found at [2].
[1]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/kvrocks_controller.xml
[2] https://lis
