Thanks to the concern for the release with HugeGraph Toolchain repo, after
listened to the dev & user voice, we think merge them to one will
help the community work/contribute for them better. (Due to their function is
similar & users don't need to download multiple repos)
And regard to the i
Hi,
Looking at the source jar at [1] it contains the Apache 2.0 license and the non
generated source files files have Apache headers so I think we can say this is
OK.
Kind Regards,
Justin
1. https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/stax/stax/1.2.0/
---
Hi,
Looks like a nice project.
BTW, the mailing list is best to use x...@hugegraph.apache.org.
Willem Jiang 于2022年1月11日周二 20:21写道：
> Hi Jermy,
>
> Thanks for the explanation.
> If hugegraph-studio is going to retire, I think it's OK if we just
> include hugegraph-hubble in the hugegraph-toolchai
This is the license of his dependencies, but his own license is not clear,
I am not sure how to deal with this situation, but I think it has certain
risks, let us listen to other people's ideas
Mohammad Noureldin 于2022年1月12日周三 22:18写道：
> Hi,
>
> I hope this helps. Found this [1], there it states
Hi,
I hope this helps. Found this [1], there it states that it has a Compile
Dependency (stax-api) with what it seems to be using Dual License:
- CDDL 1.0
- GPL
That said, I believe it is fair to assume that stax 1.2.0 follows one, or
both, of these 2 licenses.
[1] https://mvnrepository.com/arti
Hi,
This does not mean that the historical version he published is compliant.
Hans Van Akelyen 于2022年1月12日周三 20:07写道：
> I "think" it is ASF2 licensed [1]
>
> This location seems to be a copy from their original svn/cvs code.
>
> Cheers,
> Hans
>
> [1] https://github.com/codehaus/stax/blob/maste
I "think" it is ASF2 licensed [1]
This location seems to be a copy from their original svn/cvs code.
Cheers,
Hans
[1] https://github.com/codehaus/stax/blob/master/dev/ASF2.0.txt
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 12:52, Calvin Kirs wrote:
> Justin Mclean 于2022年1月12日周三 18:18写道：
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > st
Justin Mclean 于2022年1月12日周三 18:18写道：
>
> Hi,
>
> > stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is not used directly by DataLab but as a dependency
> of com.azure:azure-identity:jar:1.3.0:compile that has MIT license
>
hi, Justin, that's what I'm worried about, stax: stax this version does
not have a relevant license, a
Hi,
> stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is not used directly by DataLab but as a dependency of
> com.azure:azure-identity:jar:1.3.0:compile that has MIT license
The license of stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is what is relevant here, just because it is
a dependancy of a MIT licensed jar doesn’t make it acceptable. Do
Hi,
stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is not used directly by DataLab but as a dependency of
com.azure:azure-identity:jar:1.3.0:compile that has MIT license
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.azure/azure-identity/1.3.0
Which is acceptable according to
https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a
10 matches
Mail list logo
