On 2020/04/09 19:42:59, Stephen Mallette wrote:
> >
> > On 2020/04/08 14:02:26, Stephen Mallette wrote:
> > > Just a general question from someone who tries to follow what happens in
> > > the graph community in general - what is the relationship between
> > > "AgensGraph" and "AgensGraph Ex
OK, good. Thanks for the explanation.
Eya Badal Abdisho 于2020年4月10日周五 上午3:24写道：
>
>
> On 2020/04/09 01:09:57, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> > Feel the same thing.
> >
> > I see the contributors of these two projects are almost the same so I
> > assume that the old AgensGraph is also maintained by the
They are not debating,
They canceled the vote and fixed the problem. But I couldn't send a link to the
rules to confirm my reclamation. That's why I'm asking.
Chris
Von: Dave Fisher
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. April 2020 20:28
An: general
Betreff: Re: Do Pooling j
> On Apr 9, 2020, at 11:31 AM, Eya Badal Abdisho
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020/04/09 01:09:57, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
>> Feel the same thing.
>>
>> I see the contributors of these two projects are almost the same so I
>> assume that the old AgensGraph is also maintained by the same community an
>
> On 2020/04/08 14:02:26, Stephen Mallette wrote:
> > Just a general question from someone who tries to follow what happens in
> > the graph community in general - what is the relationship between
> > "AgensGraph" and "AgensGraph Extensions"?
> >
> >Agensgraph is a fork of Postgres, where the s
On 2020/04/08 14:02:26, Stephen Mallette wrote:
> Just a general question from someone who tries to follow what happens in
> the graph community in general - what is the relationship between
> "AgensGraph" and "AgensGraph Extensions"?
>
>Agensgraph is a fork of Postgres, where the source code
On 2020/04/09 01:09:57, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> Feel the same thing.
>
> I see the contributors of these two projects are almost the same so I
> assume that the old AgensGraph is also maintained by the same community and
> will abandoned?
>
>As also mentioned above AgensGraph has been an open
> On Apr 9, 2020, at 11:25 AM, Christofer Dutz
> wrote:
>
> Yhhh ... buuut.
>
> We're talking about convenience binaries here ... as we keep on insisting
> that only source bundles are releases.
> So technically they are doing it correctly, as the source distribution, we
> are
Yhhh ... buuut.
We're talking about convenience binaries here ... as we keep on insisting that
only source bundles are releases.
So technically they are doing it correctly, as the source distribution, we are
doing the voting on actually does have the DISCLAIMER in it.
Perhaps we sh
The DISCLAIMER is an Incubator requirement.
https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#disclaimers
Regards,
Dave
> On Apr 9, 2020, at 11:07 AM, Christofer Dutz
> wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> unfortunately I can't see the requirement to have a DISCLAIMER in there ...
> nor could I find i
Hi Dave,
unfortunately I can't see the requirement to have a DISCLAIMER in there ... nor
could I find it ... I totally agree with you, that it should be that way, but I
couldn't find a written baking of that position so I could vote -1 and send a
pointer to some documentation.
Chris
Am 09.0
Hi Chris,
There should not be a question. If these are official Apache packages from the
project published on Maven Central with org.apache co-ordinates then they must
meet all of release policy and include NOTICE, LICENSE, and, if incubating,
DISCLAIMER. They must also be released on the offic
> On Apr 8, 2020, at 12:42 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> HI,
>
>> I suggest:
>> a) Changing the language of such banners to "Pull Requests Welcome"
>> (because "forking" can be misunderstood and due to our fierce
>> corporate independence principle)
>> b) Asking our projects to add a "rel=nofo
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 3:10 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> ...And an interesting observation is that, the AgensGraph project changed the
> license to AGPL in the past and then after several month changed back to AL
> 2.0...
FWIW, I don't think these changes make a difference in terms of
entering
14 matches
Mail list logo
