One of the items that is on the list to do before releasing Apache MXNet is
removing ZeroMQ from the codebase/dependencies.
ZeroMQ is licensed under the LGPL 3.0 with an exception for static
compiling.
They have long been interested in relicensing to MPL 2.0, but haven't made
much progress, thoug
The situation isn't that bad. It is due to the fact this is a "sdist" (not a
bdist). Our git repo does contain the licenses and does pass RAT.
I'll discuss with Max how we will fix this. Probably we create a real "source
tarball" with build instructions to create a "sdist". Let's see. I'm just
It looks like the header issues are tracked as
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-300
Thanks Tal!
John
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 10:11 PM Tal Liron wrote:
> +1 non-binding.
>
> Justin, most of the YAML files do have the header, it seems that only our
> examples don't. I will make a note t
+1 non-binding.
Justin, most of the YAML files do have the header, it seems that only our
examples don't. I will make a note to add them.
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - signatures and hashes good
> - disclaimer
Copying my non-binding +1 from dev@griffin
validated signature
checked license
run mvn clean install successfully
Alex Lv
From: William Guo
Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 9:09:30 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: jmcl...@apache.org; Henry Saputra; luk
Hi all,
This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Griffin 0.1.5-incubating,
release candidate 2. This is the first release of Griffin.
Apache Griffin is data quality service for modern data system, it defines a
standard process to define, measure data quality for well-known dimensio
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes good
- disclaimer exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- no unexpected binaries
- All source file have ASF headers (would be nice if the yaml files has ASF
headers)
I did run into an issue compiling but probably my setup. Is OSX
Hi all,
This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Griffin 0.1.5-incubating,
release candidate 2. This is the first release of Griffin.
Apache Griffin is data quality service for modern data system, it defines a
standard process to define, measure data quality for well-known dimensio
Hi,
Sorry but it’s -1 form me due to licensing issues. If it was just LICENSE
missing a few permissive licensed pieces I would be +1 please fix in next
release. However you are not following the terms of the MIT license (missing
the MIT text in several cases) and their’s one file which may incl
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes correct
- disclaimer exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE look good
- It’s hard to check headers in this release but a spot check codn't find any
issues. Would be nice if text file like xml and sql files had headers IMO but
not a r
For what it's worth, I have no concerns with Fluo's graduation based on the
conversation here.
John
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:02 PM Josh Elser wrote:
>
>
> On 7/5/17 1:51 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > I have some questions:
> >
> >> On Jul 5, 2017, at 10:18 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
>
On 7/5/17 1:51 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi Josh,
I have some questions:
On Jul 5, 2017, at 10:18 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
As a mentor, I consciously avoided an explicit "+1" until we got some IPMC
discussion. Let me expand:
The current members of Fluo are great, get the Apache Way, and are
s
It seems the discussion has died down. I'm going to plan to finalize the
last few parts, make the jenkins job also build the legacy bits and move to
the new site sometime next week.
I'll drop a mail when I have the last of it staged and ready to go.
John
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 10:27 AM John D.
+1
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Karol Brejna
wrote:
> IPMC Community,
>
> The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.4-RC1 has passed.
> We would like to now submit this release candidate to the IPMC.
>
> The PPMC vote thread is here:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d0
Roman and John,
I have created the following JIRA to track this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-1496 ("Deliver LICENSE, NOTICE
and DISCLAIMER in main PXF RPM")
Regarding the comment "its a little odd that you only provide RPMs", this
is the project's first attempt at delivering
To Dave’s question about participation, I believe that’s correct. The PPMC
members who are not proposed for the PMC have all been wholly inactive for at
least year.
To Dave’s question about commit rights, as a podling we never added any
non-PPMC committers, so I personally think it’s appropriat
Flavio,
I'll update podlings.xml and projects/distributedlog.xml for you.
John
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 10:39 AM Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> The vote passes with the following:
>
> - 3 +1 binding votes:
> * Flavio Junqueira
> * Henry Saputra
> * John D. Ament
> - 6 +1 non-b
So I just went back through the archives. I think I share Dave's concerns
about notifying. It looks like the incubator list was the first place the
proposed resolution was shared. Would be good to put in front of the
private@streams list make sure no one has any concerns with it.
John
On Wed,
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 5:05 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Ruilong Huo wrote:
> > Hi IPMC member,
> >
> >
> > The PPMC vote for the Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release has passed.
> We kindly request that the IPMC now vote on the release.
> >
> >
> > The PPMC vot
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Ruilong Huo wrote:
> Hi IPMC member,
>
>
> The PPMC vote for the Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release has passed. We
> kindly request that the IPMC now vote on the release.
>
>
> The PPMC vote thread is located here:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ee0b811
Thanks for clarifying. Does this list correspond to those who have participated
with commits and project work in the last 6 months or year who are PPMC members
or committers? Will you continue to allow all current committers to have commit
rights once you go to TLP?
My concern is anyone losing
As the PPMC member encouraged to draft the resolution, that was the condition I
decided to apply, after running it by a few others from the community
out-of-band. There was no email thread on the topic, so using the definition
that decisions must be made on the list, this wasn’t a group decisio
Hi Steve,
Where was that decision made? I don’t see that recently in Pony Mail archives.
I don’t see anything wrong with decision I just don’t see any record of it.
Please let us know when it was made and how it was recorded.
Regards,
Dave
> On Jul 5, 2017, at 12:33 PM, sblackmon wrote:
>
>
John,
We decided to propose only PPMC members who voted +1 to the graduation
resolution for the PMC. If that left out anyone harboring a latent plan to
re-engage with the project community, and they let us know on dev@streams, we’d
be happy to add their names onto the resolution.
Steve
On
Hi -
Top posting. These are all excellent reasons to remain separate.
Best Regards,
Dave
> On Jul 5, 2017, at 12:29 PM, Christopher wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 1:52 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>> Hi Josh,
>>
>> I have some questions:
>>
>>> On Jul 5, 2017, at 10:18 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 1:52 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> I have some questions:
>
> > On Jul 5, 2017, at 10:18 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> >
> > As a mentor, I consciously avoided an explicit "+1" until we got some
> IPMC discussion. Let me expand:
> >
> > The current members of Fluo are gre
Hi Steve,
Thanks for drafting this. I see there's a big difference between the
listed PPMC and the proposed PMC. I'm assuming you've reached out to those
excluded and confirmed they're not interested in Streams any longer?
John
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:48 PM sblackmon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The
Hello,
The Streams PPMC has discussed [1] and voted [2] to graduate to TLP.
In preparation for an IPMC vote on the matter, we’ve updated our project status
xml [3] and corresponding whimsy podlingStatus [4], completed an Apache
Maturity Model Assessment [5], and drafted a proposed charter [6].
Hi Josh,
I have some questions:
> On Jul 5, 2017, at 10:18 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
>
> As a mentor, I consciously avoided an explicit "+1" until we got some IPMC
> discussion. Let me expand:
>
> The current members of Fluo are great, get the Apache Way, and are
> self-sufficient. I have no con
As a mentor, I consciously avoided an explicit "+1" until we got some
IPMC discussion. Let me expand:
The current members of Fluo are great, get the Apache Way, and are
self-sufficient. I have no concerns over them operating as a TLP -- I
think they are ready. However, they have only added a s
awesome, thanks!
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 10:16 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Done happy editing!
>
> On Jul 5, 2017 11:32 AM, "Dave Neuman" wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > Can you please grant write access for my user (neuman) to the Incubator
> > wiki page (https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2017)? I
Copying my non-binding +1 from dev@ariatosca:
[
1) Validated signature & checksums
2) Validated LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, "incubating" in archive name
3) Made a clean install using "pip install ."
4) Ran tests using "make test"
+1
]
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Ran Ziv wrote:
> Copying my
Copying my non-binding +1 from dev@ariatosca
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> Copying my +1 from dev@ariatosca
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 9:57 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > Copying my +1 from the dev list.
> >
> > - Builds from source
> > - Signed
> > - Clearly separa
Done happy editing!
On Jul 5, 2017 11:32 AM, "Dave Neuman" wrote:
> Hello,
> Can you please grant write access for my user (neuman) to the Incubator
> wiki page (https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2017)? I need it to
> upload the July report for the Traffic Control project.
>
> Thanks in adv
Hello,
Can you please grant write access for my user (neuman) to the Incubator
wiki page (https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2017)? I need it to
upload the July report for the Traffic Control project.
Thanks in advance!
Dave
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 06/27/2017 07:47 AM, Karol Brejna wrote:
IPMC Community,
The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.4-RC1 has passed.
We would like to now submit this release candidate to the IPMC.
The PPMC vote thread is here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d0
Gently reminder for the IPMC. We would need an additional binding vote.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 06/27/2017 07:47 AM, Karol Brejna wrote:
IPMC Community,
The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.4-RC1 has passed.
We would like to now submit this release candidate to the IPMC.
T
Copying my +1 from dev@ariatosca
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 9:57 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Copying my +1 from the dev list.
>
> - Builds from source
> - Signed
> - Clearly separated source, sdist and bdist files
>
> John
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 9:52 AM Ran Ziv wrote:
>
> > The ariatosca commun
Copying my +1 from the dev list.
- Builds from source
- Signed
- Clearly separated source, sdist and bdist files
John
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 9:52 AM Ran Ziv wrote:
> The ariatosca community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
> ariatosca 0.1.0.
> Pursuant to the Releases section of
The ariatosca community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
ariatosca 0.1.0.
Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy and with the
endorsement of two of our mentors we would now like to request the
permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the tarball Apache's
/dist/re
40 matches
Mail list logo
