As a mentor, I consciously avoided an explicit "+1" until we got some IPMC discussion. Let me expand:

The current members of Fluo are great, get the Apache Way, and are self-sufficient. I have no concerns over them operating as a TLP -- I think they are ready. However, they have only added a single committer and I see none in the pipeline -- Fluo is defined by the current committers.

My hesitation is balancing the Incubators goal of "pushing podlings to graduate" and ensuring adequate diversity in the podling. This is especially difficult for Fluo as they're "niche on niche" (it's a difficult dist-sys problem/software, and not many people use the tech they're building on top of given my view of the world).

I realize that this discussion could easily spiral out of control, turning into some meta-discussion about Incubator goals. I want to avoid that.

I'm looking for some feelings from other IPMC folks about how to approach the Fluo podling given their specific circumstances. If other people are also hesitant, I would also be interested in suggestions about what we would concretely change (because I don't know what to suggest that "fix" the diversity issue for them that isn't changing the core of their project). If people aren't worried, I'm happy to give an explicit +1.

- Josh

On 7/3/17 4:15 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
Hi Christopher,

Thanks for the heads up.  A few nits on my part, but overall I would be
happy to see Fluo graduate.  When reading my notes, please also consult the
graduation guide at [1].

- The discussion and vote should have happened on your public dev list, not
private.  It's good that at least discussion happened publicly, and the
actual vote isn't required so it's not a big deal.
- I don't see any sign that you added new committers or PPMC members since
incubating.  See also [2].  I don't see that as a show stopper, as it looks
like a diverse group.
- Of the proposed PMC, how many are actively committing to Fluo?  Was there
an ask at any point to see who was still interested?
- Only one mentor voted on the graduation.  Would be great to see if the
other mentors are equally on board.

John

[1]: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#toplevel
[2]: https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Fluo

On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 2:12 PM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote:

Greetings Incubator,

The Fluo podling has decided to pursue graduation to a TLP. The result of
the internal PPMC vote is at [1] (apologies that it occurred on our private
list instead of on our dev list; the discuss thread [2] which preceded it
did occur on the dev list). Our podling status page has recently been
updated and can be found here[3].

Below, you can view the proposed TLP resolution which we'd like to present
to the board with the support of the IPMC, after sufficient discussion here
and subsequent IPMC vote.

[1]:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/04a9de260fcd14b184ae7a8b725e348e13ee4ad10e3057a6a404732c@%3Cprivate.fluo.apache.org%3E
[2]:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3164d77ea18c3e36ce215ab4a07b2cb80cf9c49c2503ef5d1defbdde@%3Cdev.fluo.apache.org%3E
[3]: https://incubator.apache.org/projects/fluo

**********
Establish the Apache Fluo Project

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public,
related to the storage and incremental processing of large data sets.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
(PMC), to be known as the "Apache Fluo Project", be and hereby is
established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Fluo Project be and hereby is responsible for
the creation and maintenance of software related to the storage and
incremental processing of large data sets; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Fluo" be and hereby
is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of
the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Fluo Project, and to
have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the
scope of responsibility of the Apache Fluo Project; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Fluo Project:

* Billie Rinaldi <bil...@apache.org>
* Chris McTague <cjmcta...@apache.org>
* Christopher Tubbs <ctubb...@apache.org>
* Corey J. Nolet <cjno...@apache.org>
* Drew Farris <d...@apache.org>
* Josh Elser <els...@apache.org>
* Keith Turner <ktur...@apache.org>
* Mike Walch <mwa...@apache.org>

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Keith Turner be appointed
to the office of Vice President, Apache Fluo, to serve in accordance
with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the
Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal
or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it
further

RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Fluo PMC be and hereby is tasked with
the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development
and increased participation in the Apache Fluo Project; and be it
further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Fluo Project be and hereby is tasked with the
migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Fluo podling; and
be it further

RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator
Fluo podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter
discharged.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to