Re: [VOTE]: Apache Weex-incubating Release 0.12.0-RC4

2017-05-17 Thread sospartan
ok, I'll update my release script to bring every source code under root directory. Thanks for this tip. On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:03 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 7:57 PM sospartan wrote: > > > John, > > Thanks for the review. > > I don't understand the issue with "sub-di

Re: Questions on incubator releases

2017-05-17 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Yes, though typically the staged maven repo is reviewed as a part of the > release. +1 best to review and vote on both at once >> (q2) If the answer of q1 is yes, do we need to prepare different >> LICENSE and NOTICE files for the binaries? IMO the answer is likely to be yes. In a lot o

Re: [VOTE]: Apache Weex-incubating Release 0.12.0-RC4

2017-05-17 Thread John D. Ament
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 7:57 PM sospartan wrote: > John, > Thanks for the review. > I don't understand the issue with "sub-directory". Is there any standard > directory structure for source release? > Typically the release contents are simply in the root directory. There should not be a subdir

Re: Questions on incubator releases

2017-05-17 Thread John D. Ament
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 7:14 PM Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > Hi, > > The release VOTE has been passed in both the Podling dev list [1] and > the Incubator's general list [2] for Apache Ratis. I also have copied > the RC to dist/release so that it is available at [3]. > > My questions are: > (q1) Our rele

Re: [VOTE]: Apache Weex-incubating Release 0.12.0-RC4

2017-05-17 Thread sospartan
John, Thanks for the review. I don't understand the issue with "sub-directory". Is there any standard directory structure for source release? John D. Ament 于2017年5月17日 周三下午11:41写道: > sospartan, > > Couple of things noticed: > > - Your email still points to your non-ASF hosted website. Don't forg

Questions on incubator releases

2017-05-17 Thread Tsz Wo Sze
Hi, The release VOTE has been passed in both the Podling dev list [1] and the Incubator's general list [2] for Apache Ratis. I also have copied the RC to dist/release so that it is available at [3]. My questions are: (q1) Our release is a source release, could we distribute binaries through othe

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar into the Apache Incubator

2017-05-17 Thread vintagewang
+1(non-binding) Pulsar is a powerful mq, I like it. On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On May 17, 2017, at 1:58 PM, Jia Zhai wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:11 AM, P. Taylor Goetz > wrote: > > > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >

Re: Looking for additional mentor for Edgent with community growth ideas/focus

2017-05-17 Thread Martin Gainty
my first impression when i first saw this 25 years ago when we stuffed network analytics into a MIB was that as long as you have SNMP protocol stack and RIPv2 enabled gateway you could pass traffic info from Network device to NetworkDevice. Cisco is probably the only company that picked up the

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar into the Apache Incubator

2017-05-17 Thread Julian Hyde
+1 (binding) > On May 17, 2017, at 1:58 PM, Jia Zhai wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:11 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> -Taylor >> >>> On May 16, 2017, at 10:39 PM, Bryan Call wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> As the champion for Pulsar, I would

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar into the Apache Incubator

2017-05-17 Thread Jia Zhai
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:11 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > +1 (binding) > > -Taylor > > > On May 16, 2017, at 10:39 PM, Bryan Call wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > As the champion for Pulsar, I would like to start a VOTE to bring the > > project in as Apache incubator podling. > >

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar into the Apache Incubator

2017-05-17 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
+1 (binding) -Taylor > On May 16, 2017, at 10:39 PM, Bryan Call wrote: > > Hi All, > > As the champion for Pulsar, I would like to start a VOTE to bring the > project in as Apache incubator podling. > > The ASF voting rules are described: > >https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar into the Apache Incubator

2017-05-17 Thread Phil Sorber
+1 (binding) On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:21 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: > Make it so! +1! (binding) > > > On May 16, 2017, at 10:39 PM, Bryan Call wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > As the champion for Pulsar, I would like to start a VOTE to bring the > > project in as Apache incubator podling. > > > > T

Re: [VOTE]: Apache Weex-incubating Release 0.12.0-RC4

2017-05-17 Thread John D. Ament
sospartan, Couple of things noticed: - Your email still points to your non-ASF hosted website. Don't forget to point to your ASF website. - The source release still contains a sub-directory. - Its still not clear to me how to create the binary. - Your package.json points still to old alibaba rep

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar into the Apache Incubator

2017-05-17 Thread Jim Jagielski
Make it so! +1! (binding) > On May 16, 2017, at 10:39 PM, Bryan Call wrote: > > Hi All, > > As the champion for Pulsar, I would like to start a VOTE to bring the > project in as Apache incubator podling. > > The ASF voting rules are described: > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/votin

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar into the Apache Incubator

2017-05-17 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On 05/17/2017 04:39 AM, Bryan Call wrote: Hi All, As the champion for Pulsar, I would like to start a VOTE to bring the project in as Apache incubator podling. The ASF voting rules are described: https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html A vote for accept

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar into the Apache Incubator

2017-05-17 Thread Dave Fisher
+1 (binding) Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On May 16, 2017, at 10:39 PM, Bryan Call wrote: > > Hi All, > > As the champion for Pulsar, I would like to start a VOTE to bring the > project in as Apache incubator podling. > > The ASF voting rules are described: > >https://www.apache.

Re: Looking for additional mentors for weex-incubating

2017-05-17 Thread sospartan
I'm very grateful to you for this. I've make some changes to the source release and start new RC vote in another thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9e9308203feb3e9651644e7bef6578a50cf21a4a0513bd6175e1fb53@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E I believe we can finally get there. Thank you.

Re: Looking for additional mentors for weex-incubating

2017-05-17 Thread Raphael Bircher
Hi sospartan Yea, I see, there are several issues. I will not act as an official mentor, but I subscribed the dev list, and we'll see what we can do. Regards Raphael Am .05.2017, 11:24 Uhr, schrieb sospartan : Weex has been incubating since 2016-11-30. Now we are working forward to our fir

Looking for additional mentors for weex-incubating

2017-05-17 Thread sospartan
Weex has been incubating since 2016-11-30. Now we are working forward to our first apache release. Because our 4 mentors are mostly absent. Now we are looking for additional mentors to join us. Anybody from IPMC interesting in weex is welcomed. Most (probably all) of our committers and contributor

Re: [VOTE]: Apache Weex-incubating Release 0.12.0-RC4

2017-05-17 Thread sospartan
Could anyone from IPMC review this release? On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 5:23 PM, sospartan wrote: > Hi IPMC, > > I'm calling a vote for Weex-incubating 0.12.0-RC4 release. > In this release, source tarball only include files necessary to build Weex > SDK. > All binaries were excluded. > A build REA

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar into the Apache Incubator

2017-05-17 Thread Raphael Bircher
+1 (binding) Am .05.2017, 04:39 Uhr, schrieb Bryan Call : Hi All, As the champion for Pulsar, I would like to start a VOTE to bring the project in as Apache incubator podling. The ASF voting rules are described: https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html A vote for accepting a ne