Since Thorsten confirmed, please feel free to consider my vote a +1.
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 2:57 PM Ralph Goers
wrote:
> There was a discussion on the log4cxx list on March 1st and 2nd so
> Thorsten is aware. He also accepted the invite to be a Logging Services
> committer.
>
> Yes, the vote ha
+1
Regards
Felix
> Am 11.03.2017 um 09:31 schrieb Ralph Goers :
>
> Log4cxx was originally a sub-project of the Logging Services. In 2013 several
> users became frustrated that they were submitting patches but there were no
> committers who could apply them. The Logging Services PMC was not co
Hi all,
The CarbonData PPMC discussed and approved the following graduation resolution.
I now propose this resolution to your review before starting a vote.
The resolution is based on the standard template. The full text of the proposed
resolution is as follows:
X. Establish the Apache Carb
Forwarding my +1 (binding) from the dev@ list.
Edward Capriolo wrote:
I am pleased to call an IPMC vote for gossip-0.1.2-incubating.
The PPMC vote thread is here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5571d2996633f3a7ed10f3b0de3366702027db3b2f7870403c390141@%3Cdev.gossip.apache.org%3E
Addition
Hi all,
After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing Apache
Mnemonic 0.5.0-incubating passed with 3 binding +1s, 3 non-binding +1s and no 0
or -1.
* *Binding votes +1s: **
Patrick Hunt (phunt)
Henry Saputra (hsaputra)
Gangumalla, Uma (umamahesh)
** non-binding votes +1
I am pleased to call an IPMC vote for gossip-0.1.2-incubating.
The PPMC vote thread is here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5571d2996633f3a7ed10f3b0de3366702027db3b2f7870403c390141@%3Cdev.gossip.apache.org%3E
Additionally a description of the new features in the release is here:
https://l
As a general question, do binding votes always get forwarded from the dev
vote, and if so, should we report that in the @general VOTE?
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> Forwarding my vote from the dev list:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> > On Mar 10, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Marc Spehlmann
The incubating Apache Fineract community believes it is time to graduate to
TLP.
Apache Fineract entered incubation in December of 2015. Since then, we've
overcome technical challenges to remove Category X dependencies, and made 3
releases. Our most recent release contains binary convenience art
It has been a while and we have not received any other IPMC binding vote
other than myself.
Should I consider this lazy consensus and recommend the podling to proceed
with publication of the release?
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> ping, any other volunteers to review t
+1 (binding)
First off, sorry for the delay on voting.
Let me also clarify that, at the time of this vote,
apache-metron-0.3.1-rc5-incubating was pointing to
7abd7e8a231c6cbe9ee4ab23a5df1e97344f5212. It's good to use the commit ID
instead of the tag name (as the latter is mutable whereas the
Forwarding my vote from the dev list:
+1 (binding)
> On Mar 10, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Marc Spehlmann wrote:
>
> The Apache Incubator Quickstep community has approved a vote to release
> Quickstep-0.1.0 RC6. Quickstep is a high performance relational database
> system built from the ground up for m
Hi Incubator PMC,
The Apache Streams community has voted and approved the proposal to release
Apache Streams 0.5 (incubating).
The dev-list vote succeeded with 3 IPMC +1s, so we now request a
lazy-consensus vote from the wider IPMC.
The 0.5.0-incubating release simplifies the build process by co
12 matches
Mail list logo
