On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 11:54 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Niali,
>
> I don't disagree with your assessment. In actuality, Johnzon has only
> added one committer in its 22 months in the incubator, who later joined
> their PPMC and is now slated to be their VP. However, adding committers
> isn't th
Niali,
I don't disagree with your assessment. In actuality, Johnzon has only
added one committer in its 22 months in the incubator, who later joined
their PPMC and is now slated to be their VP. However, adding committers
isn't the only form of community growth we expect to see when graduating.
J
Hi,
Are the new files added since the previous release (and missing Apache headers)
be considered under the Apache license or BSD license?
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For add
Le 3 avr. 2016 23:58, "Niall Pemberton" a
écrit :
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Mark Struberg
> wrote:
>
> > Please look at more current data
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-johnzon/graphs/contributors
>
>
> I didn't see your commits today - but otherwise doesn't look alot
> dif
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Mark Struberg
wrote:
> Please look at more current data
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-johnzon/graphs/contributors
I didn't see your commits today - but otherwise doesn't look alot
difference.
Also note that there are patches applied from contributors v
Please look at more current data
https://github.com/apache/incubator-johnzon/graphs/contributors
Also note that there are patches applied from contributors via Jira patches and
NOT via git-pull. Thus they show not up in the graph above.
>From that category we have Reinhard Sandtner (apacheId rs
Hello Incubator PMC,
Thank you in advance for reviewing MADlib v1.9-rc1.
This is the 2nd ASF release for Apache MADlib (incubating). The goal of
this 2nd release is: general availability of MADlib v1.9 for community use.
The software in this release is very similar to the 1st ASF release MADli
Johnzon reports for June, Sept & Dec 2015 all listed "adding new
committers/pmc members" in the "most important issues to address in the
move towards graduation" - but in that time there were no changes to the
community. So what changed to make the ppmc/mentors now think the project
is ready to gra
+1 (binding)
LieGrue,
strub
> On Saturday, 2 April 2016, 19:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 04/01/2016 09:49 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote:
>> The Apache Johnzon community has discussed and voted on graduation to
>> a top level project. The vote passed
