Easy enough to have folks repeat the votes here and moot the question.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Sharad Agarwal wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 3:49 AM, Jakob Homan wrote:
>
> > Following two positive discussions[1][2] about its curent status, the
> > Lens community
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 3:49 AM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> Following two positive discussions[1][2] about its curent status, the
> Lens community has voted[3] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote
> passed with 22 +1s:
>
> Binding +1 x 14: {Jakob, Jean-Baptiste, Yash, Amareshwari, Sh
Hey Taylor-
That had always been my understanding as well, but Chris Mattman is
pretty sure that's not the case: http://bit.ly/VotesPPMC
Votes from IPMC members in that vote were from myself, Jean-Baptiste,
Amareshwari, Chris and Sharad.
Thanks,
Jakob
On 24 July 2015 at 18:18, P. Taylor Goet
Hi Jakob,
Of the PPMC votes, how many were IPMC members? I think I see at least one.
My understanding is that they carry over.
-Taylor
> On Jul 24, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
>
> Following two positive discussions[1][2] about its curent status, the
> Lens community has voted[3] to g
Following two positive discussions[1][2] about its curent status, the
Lens community has voted[3] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote
passed with 22 +1s:
Binding +1 x 14: {Jakob, Jean-Baptiste, Yash, Amareshwari, Sharad,
Raghavendra, Raju, Jaideep, Suma, Himanshu, Rajat, Srikanth, Chris,
Ars
An an active mentor of the podling I do support the graduation. The last, to
my knowledge, concern expressed was about insufficient open discussions of the
new features on the dev@ and that has been addressed by [1]
WRT your observation: I do think the diversity part in the graduation
requirement
Hi all,
After opened for over 72 hours, the vote for releasing Apache Twill
0.6.0-incubating passed with 3 binding +1s and no 0 or -1.
Binding +1s:
Henry Saputra
Justin Mclean
Jan I
Thanks to all who helped the release.
The Apache Twill Team
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:17 PM, jan i wrote:
> +1
Le 23/07/2015 21:19, Ted Dunning a écrit :
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 09:29AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Konstantin Boudnik
wrote:
Looks like now we can put "git branch deletion data loss" fiction to
rest.
