On 4/8/15, 11:09 AM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
>JIRA has been used for this purpose before. However, if we're going to
>the
>trouble of codifying this process, is there any reason not to `svn mkdir`
>the
>`donations` directory and use it henceforth?
IMO, it would be better to not use SVN. Mos
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> Thanks again to everyone who has contributed towards another strong report
> from the Incubator this month -- I'm confident that we'll meet the same
> standards next month but with smoother running.
>
Thanks for the help Marvin. The proce
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:32 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:02 PM Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>> We should feel good about the content of the report for this month -- it
>> meets or exceeds our usual standards. However, we've had a few process
>> glitches here at the end.
>>
>
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:02 PM Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> > General section looks grand.
> >
> > We have a few projects unreported, DataFu, ODF Toolkit, OpenAz.
> >
> > I know a bit about Datafu which has been very quiet for some time.
> >
> >
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> General section looks grand.
>
> We have a few projects unreported, DataFu, ODF Toolkit, OpenAz.
>
> I know a bit about Datafu which has been very quiet for some time.
>
> Who knows more about the others?
>
> Andrei, Konstantin, Suresh are the
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:05 AM, jan i >
> wrote:
> > But even so In Corinthia we bended the rules and imported directly into
> out
> > git repo. This still ensures a record == initial commit.
>
> I trust that Corinthia's actions were reasonabl
Thanks Nick!
Best regards,
Kim
**
Kim Whitehall, Ph.D.
Scientific Applications Software Engineer
Computer Science for Data Intensive Applications Group (398M)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
4800 Oak Grove Drive,
Pasadena, CA
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Whitehall, Kim D (398M) wrote:
my user account is kimwhitehall
Karma granted, good luck with the proposal!
Nick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e
Hi,
my user account is kimwhitehall
I would like access to edit the ClimateModelDiagnosticAnalyzerProposal wiki
Thanks!
Best regards,
Kim
Sounds great Chris. Thanks much. I'll get myself added in there in just a
second.
-- Joyce
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Yes, Mike would love for you to help out!
>
> Please add yourself as a mentor thank you!
>
> +++
Yes, Mike would love for you to help out!
Please add yourself as a mentor thank you!
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 9110
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> I would like to bring this question up again. BLOCKER.
>
> The http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
> document states that
>
>
> *Note:* the grant form *must* be acknowledged before continuing. If the
> source
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:05 AM, jan i wrote:
> But even so In Corinthia we bended the rules and imported directly into out
> git repo. This still ensures a record == initial commit.
I trust that Corinthia's actions were reasonable, but "bending the rules" is
an approach you might take when the ru
Great proposal Chris. If you're still looking for mentors I would be happy
to help out.
-- Joyce
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 11:24 AM, jonathon wrote:
> On 06/04/15 17:05, James Carman wrote:
> > I would love to help out. I don't know much about the problem domain,
> > but I am a "sciency" kind of
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Ok, I was more reading it as must be placed into the drop box with the
> checksum so it can be referenced properly.
>
> In any event, I think the text is confusing me quite a bit and would like
> to know what is 'proper' process for a GitHub
Ok, I was more reading it as must be placed into the drop box with the
checksum so it can be referenced properly.
In any event, I think the text is confusing me quite a bit and would like
to know what is 'proper' process for a GitHub project to come in? Does it
even make sense when Git has no 'can
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> I would like to bring this question up again. BLOCKER.
>
> The http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
> document states that
>
>
> *Note:* the grant form *must* be acknowledged before continuing. If the
> source is
I would like to bring this question up again. BLOCKER.
The http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
document states that
*Note:* the grant form *must* be acknowledged before continuing. If the
source is referenced by checksum in the grant, commit the canonical tarball
18 matches
Mail list logo
