Hi Roman,
you might have noticed, that one of the mentors (me) were actively
asking for this report. I simply forgot to sign it, which does not
happen often to me. In example, the last report was signed (Dec).
More mentors are always welcome; but its not this podling is out on his
own. From mento
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Gour Saha wrote:
> Marvin,
> That totally makes sense.
>
> I am going to cancel this release and prepare a new RC with the fixes. I
> will call it 0.70.1-incubating and start the vote all over again.
>
> Thank you.
And thank you, Gour, for your persistence and und
Marvin,
That totally makes sense.
I am going to cancel this release and prepare a new RC with the fixes. I
will call it 0.70.1-incubating and start the vote all over again.
Thank you.
-Gour
On 3/12/15, 7:02 PM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Gour Saha wrote:
>
>>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Gour Saha wrote:
> Is it okay if we move them to a more appropriate location like
> src/test/resources directory? Or should we just delete them?
Here's the rationale, redux:
The Apache Software Foundation releases open source software. Binary files
cannot be au
Hi Justin,
Thank you for your time.
These files are test resources to make tests work on Jenkins on a windows
machine - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLIDER-201
The readme.md located below also gives a little info but I just realized
that it is incomplete -
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
Hi,
I notice the binaries in question are in version control as well [1] which is
highly unusual. This seem to be related to this [2], I also note it doest't
look like vote for Hadoop 2.6 RC0 passed but RC1 did. [3]. Any else have
concerns about this?
Thanks,
Justin
1.
https://git-wip-us.apa
HI,
It's -1 binding from me as there are binary files (dll's and exe's!) in the
source release (in both the .zip and tar.gz).
Was rat run over the release? It seems a little strange the release got this
far without anyone noticing that.
Here are the offending files:
apache-slider-0.70.0-incub
Thanks for the feedback Bertrand!
Yes, I agree it makes sense to start with a single user and dev
mailing list. I got this feedback during the proposal phase, but I
forgot to update the proposal.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Olem
Hi!
all throughout my tenure I was keeping an eye
on Wave trying to figure out how we can help
that community. The poddling has been incubating
close to 5 years and for a long time they've struggled
with the basics of producing the release and growing
the community beyond its core.
I was extremel
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> It is my pleasure and privilege to open up the following
> proposal:
>https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GroovyProposal
Thanks Roman,
the proposal looks great and I am super happy to see Groovy in these lands!
As the PMC chair for
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> It is my pleasure and privilege to open up the following
> proposal:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GroovyProposal
I've read through the proposal (rev 17). It looks good to me.
FWIW I winced a bit on Apache Pig's behalf when
Am 12.03.2015 18:15, schrieb Roman Shaposhnik:
[…]
In short:
* blocking proposal on the # of initial committers -- no, or at
least I don't think so.
* killing ourselves over reaching every single contributor on GH -- no.
* doing a reasonable due diligence *while incubating* on reachin
On 12/03/2015 18:19, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Cédric Champeau
wrote:
I made this remark to myself, which is that too many people still think that
Groovy is only a dynamic language. I think it's a problem because
it's not, and some people really dislike dynamic l
+1 binding
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Gour Saha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a call for a vote for releasing Apache Slider 0.70.0-incubating.
>
> This is a source+binary release with one .tar file (appdef_1.tar), which
> is a text file used for -ve testing.
>
> Summary of fixes: http://s.ap
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Cédric Champeau
wrote:
> I made this remark to myself, which is that too many people still think that
> Groovy is only a dynamic language. I think it's a problem because
> it's not, and some people really dislike dynamic languages. When they read
> something like
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> Am 12.03.2015 17:21, schrieb Ted Dunning:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>* several writers of documentation (without committer privileges)
>>>* one or two creators of graphics (icons, or
I made this remark to myself, which is that too many people still think
that Groovy is only a dynamic language. I think it's a problem because
it's not, and some people really dislike dynamic languages. When they
read something like "the Groovy dynamic object-oriented programming
language" (from
On 12/03/2015 17:53, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Mar 12, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
... I am quite certain, most Incubator members would accept a project to
have a "vibrant community", if the project could show, for example,
Am 12.03.2015 17:21, schrieb Ted Dunning:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
* several writers of documentation (without committer privileges)
* one or two creators of graphics (icons, or whatever, without
committer privileges)
* one or more organizations providin
+1
See C030 on our project maturity model
http://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html
And some commentary on committer = someone who is committed rather than someone
who commits code https://community.apache.org/contributors/
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A su
> On 11 Mar 2015, at 13:43, Gour Saha wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a call for a vote for releasing Apache Slider 0.70.0-incubating.
>
> This is a source+binary release with one .tar file (appdef_1.tar), which is a
> text file used for -ve testing.
>
> Summary of fixes: http://s.apache.org/A
> On Mar 12, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
> wrote:
>> ... I am quite certain, most Incubator members would accept a project to
>> have a "vibrant community", if the project could show, for example,...
>
> Note that we don
I think the business about numbers of committers and how additions to the
community are cultivated is a sniff test concerning sustainability. The idea
is to have some sense that there is a sustainable community in place and that
there is as much attention on nurturing that sustainability as the
Crikey, this went into my junk mail folder. Signed off.
Regards,
Alan
> On Mar 7, 2015, at 6:04 AM, Leonidas Fegaras wrote:
>
> Dear MRQL mentors,
> This is a reminder to approve the MRQL report.
> Please edit it and approve it at:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2015
>
> Thanks
+1
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Thejas Nair wrote:
> The Singa Incubator Proposal document has been updated based on
> feedback in the proposal thread.
>
> This vote is proposing the inclusion of Apache Singa as incubator project.
> The vote will run for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> * several writers of documentation (without committer privileges)
> * one or two creators of graphics (icons, or whatever, without
> committer privileges)
> * one or more organizations providing hosting services, and the like
>
This
2015-03-12 16:27 GMT+01:00 Bertrand Delacretaz :
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
> > ...Easy: we reach out to all the folks who may have a legitimate claim
> to have
> > contributed to the project in substantial ways and ivite extend an offer
> to them
> > (explaining
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> ...Easy: we reach out to all the folks who may have a legitimate claim to have
> contributed to the project in substantial ways and ivite extend an offer to
> them
> (explaining that being a committer is...well... a commitment). The # of
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> Am 12.03.2015 10:57, schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:08 PM, jan i wrote:
>>>
>>> ...The proposal talks several places about a vibrant community and the
>>> initial
>>> commiters are only 5...
>>
>>
>
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:57 PM, 李璋华 wrote:
> ...I am a student who is going to participate the 2015 GSoC. I am a student
> of Dr. Li Dingcheng who is a PMC member of ASF. I want him to be my mentor...
You need to talk to the developers list of the project in question.
-Bertrand
-
Dear Sir/Madam:
Hope this e-mail finds you well.
I am a student who is going to participate the 2015 GSoC. I am a student of Dr.
Li Dingcheng who is a PMC member of ASF. I want him to be my mentor and we are
going to develop the Coreference Resolution with java. It will be very kind of
you i
I would have thought that graduation would be all about showing that whatever
list of committers we have (big or small) is working well? Having a large
number of committers certainly makes sense with a subversion mindset but it's
possibly an anti-pattern with a DVCS mindset (at least for a sta
Le 12/03/15 11:14, Jochen Theodorou a écrit :
> Am 12.03.2015 10:57, schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:08 PM, jan i wrote:
>>> ...The proposal talks several places about a vibrant community and
>>> the initial
>>> commiters are only 5...
>>
>> As others have said
Le 12/03/15 10:57, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:08 PM, jan i wrote:
>> ...The proposal talks several places about a vibrant community and the
>> initial
>> commiters are only 5...
> As others have said this was discussed while preparing the proposal. I
> also
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
>... I am quite certain, most Incubator members would accept a project to
> have a "vibrant community", if the project could show, for example,...
Note that we don't care about the state of the community when entering
the incubator, that's
My feeling is, that there this proposal has a positive feedback overall.
How about we put together a list of things that have to be changed/resolved
in the proposal before a vote can be started? I see:
- trademark issues
- Explanation of initial committers to community ratio
what else?
Benedikt
Am 12.03.2015 12:04, schrieb Jochen Wiedmann:
Hello, Jochen,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Jochen Theodorou
community equals committers?
No. The community is more than the team of committers. I'm sure you
understand. OTOH, the set of committers can be considered a
representation of the c
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> Am 12.03.2015 10:57, schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
>> it's fine to include only the "core" Groovy committers
>> to enter incubation, as usual it will be their task to grow that
>> community before graduating.
>
> community equals
Hello, Jochen,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Jochen Theodorou
> community equals committers?
No. The community is more than the team of committers. I'm sure you
understand. OTOH, the set of committers can be considered a
representation of the community.
I am quite certain, most Incubator me
Am 12.03.2015 10:57, schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:08 PM, jan i wrote:
...The proposal talks several places about a vibrant community and the initial
commiters are only 5...
As others have said this was discussed while preparing the proposal. I
also agree that it
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:08 PM, jan i wrote:
> ...The proposal talks several places about a vibrant community and the initial
> commiters are only 5...
As others have said this was discussed while preparing the proposal. I
also agree that it's fine to include only the "core" Groovy committe
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:08 PM, jan i wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Having just skimmed the proposal, that in general look good, one thing
> caught my eye.
>
> The proposal talks several places about a vibrant community and the initial
> commiters are only 5.
This, is a GREAT question! Thank you so much for
Hi.
Having just skimmed the proposal, that in general look good, one thing
caught my eye.
The proposal talks several places about a vibrant community and the initial
commiters are only 5.
I am not raising it as a problem, just would like a little explanation.
I think the project would fit nicel
Le 11/03/15 21:20, Martijn Dashorst a écrit :
> Great initiative!
>
> Just one question: I don't see anything related to the groovy name and
> possible trademark in the proposal. Does Pivotal have any claims to
> the name groovy, and if so are those claims transferred to the ASF?
I think we have r
44 matches
Mail list logo
