+1.
Deepal
> +1
>
> -Jake
>
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
>
>> Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Stratos is ready to graduate as a Top
>> Level Project. The board resolution is included below.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP
>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>> [ ] -1
+1 (binding)
Signatures and builds look good. Top level files seem OK.
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Ramachandran, Karthik <
kramachand...@iqt.org> wrote:
> This is a release of Apache Sentry, version 1.3.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues: http://s.a
+1 (binding)
Enis
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Devaraj Das wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:44 PM, James Taylor
> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > The Apache Phoenix podling has has discussed and voted to graduate from
> the
> > incubator with 22 +1 votes, 5 of which were IPMC vot
+1
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:44 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Apache Phoenix podling has has discussed and voted to graduate from the
> incubator with 22 +1 votes, 5 of which were IPMC vote [1]. We've made three
> releases, increased our contributor and committer list [2], and h
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> All that I suggest is that candidate Apache projects articulate how they
> differ from related projects, and that we consider the strength of this
> argument when evaluating the long term viability of the effort and
> community. It would be
Hi,
+1 (binding)
Signatures and hashes all good
DISCLAIMER correct
Filename contains "incubating"
NOTICE and LICENCE good (note minor year issue in NOTICE)
All source file have correct headers (there are few text test files that are
missing headers, you may want to look at fixing this in a later
Hi,
> Just do you have wget installed on your box?
No I didn't have it installed and that was the issue thanks. I had assumed that
it wasn't needed if you didn't run the tests perhaps a future README can be
updated to fix this?
HADOOP-7489 when running the tests on Java 1.7 (on OSX). Again perh
+1
Azeez
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Stratos is ready to graduate as a Top
> Level Project. The board resolution is included below.
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Strato
I realize this is a discussion about Optiq in particular, so please pardon
the detour. I won't continue this discussion in this thread further.
On the subject of Optiq, I'd be +1 for incubation considering that at least
two Apache projects incorporate it substantially, and a third is
considering i
+1
From: James Taylor
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 10:44 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Phoenix from the Incubator
Hi everyone,
The Apache Phoenix podling has has discussed and voted to graduate from the
incubat
All fair points. However (as your example demonstrates), referring to
this duplication as "failure" instead of evolution biases the
incubator to protect existing projects. Putting new projects on the
defensive is almost always unfair, unless they're literally forking an
existing project.
As you sa
Just do you have wget installed on your box?
There is a step in the process which pulls down the Cloudera Hadoop release
using wget, that might be what is failing.
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looks good re signatures, licence, notice file etc etc
>
> I did not
Ah sorry, I did not mean "asking to update", I meant "proposing to update".
Thanks,
- Henry
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> HI Ashutosh,
>
> Since there was a question/ comment about relationship with Apache
> MetaModel, I am asking to update the proposal to include this
HI Ashutosh,
Since there was a question/ comment about relationship with Apache
MetaModel, I am asking to update the proposal to include this
discussion in either "Relationships with Other Apache Products" or
"Alignment" section before going for a VOTE.
Apache Slider did the same thing with relat
All that I suggest is that candidate Apache projects articulate how they
differ from related projects, and that we consider the strength of this
argument when evaluating the long term viability of the effort and
community. It would be good if proposals have a "related work" section done
with the di
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> If not part of the initial proposal, then
> at least making a good case as a criteria for graduation, and writing up
> related work and how the new project differentiates could be an initial
> task done on JIRA after acceptance along the line
+1
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Melan Nimesh wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Isuru Perera wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Suresh Marru
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
+1
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Melan Nimesh wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Isuru Perera wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> >
> > > Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Stratos is ready to graduate as a Top
> > > Level Project
+1
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Isuru Perera wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
>
> > Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Stratos is ready to graduate as a Top
> > Level Project. The board resolution is included below.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Stratos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/01/2014 01:34 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> With 21 +1 votes (plenty binding), and no other votes, the vote
> passes. Welcome to the incubator Brooklyn!
Congrats! Looking forward to it.
Best,
jzb
- --
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
+1
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Stratos is ready to graduate as a Top
> Level Project. The board resolution is included below.
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Stratos as a
+1 (binding)
On 2 May 2014 15:34, Lahiru Sandaruwan wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Jake Farrell wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> -Jake
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
>>
>> > Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Stratos is ready to graduate as a Top
>> > Level
+1
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> +1
>
> -Jake
>
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
>
> > Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Stratos is ready to graduate as a Top
> > Level Project. The board resolution is included below.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Graduate Apac
+1
-Jake
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Stratos is ready to graduate as a Top
> Level Project. The board resolution is included below.
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Strat
+1 (non-binding).
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Stratos is ready to graduate as a Top
> Level Project. The board resolution is included below.
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apach
+1
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Stratos is ready to graduate as a Top
> Level Project. The board resolution is included below.
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Stratos as a
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 11:03:43PM -0400, Suresh Marru wrote:
> Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Stratos is ready to graduate as a Top Level
> Project. The board resolution is included below.
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Stratos
Hi,
Looks good re signatures, licence, notice file etc etc
I did notice a couple of very minor issues that can be addressed in later
releases:
- NOTICE has 2013 rather than 2014
- README.md is plain text not markdown format
But I was unable to get the soirce package to compile. Most likely issu
+1 (binding).
Ship it!
On 2 May 2014 04:03, Suresh Marru wrote:
> Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Stratos is ready to graduate as a Top
> Level Project. The board resolution is included below.
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Str
This is a release of Apache Sentry, version 1.3.0-incubating.
It fixes the following issues: http://s.apache.org/iCB
Source files : http://people.apache.org/~kramachandran/sentry-1.3.0-rc3/
Tag to be voted on (release-1.3.0-rc3 / SHA
31c8aca46c060685bd5a01f7706e2adab78a20d8):
https://git-wip-us
I feel the same way. And to clarify my position a bit - I am in no way against
having Optiq in the incubator, it sounds like a very impressive library. I was
merely probing if it would be possible to merge or standardize some of the
aspects of the projects - work together where it's possible, an
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014, at 03:21 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote:
> I would like to propose Optiq as an Apache Incubator project. I have
> posted the proposal to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OptiqProposal
> and
> posted the text of the proposal below.
>
> Ashutosh.
Given the importance of Optiq f
32 matches
Mail list logo
