I feel the same way. And to clarify my position a bit - I am in no way against having Optiq in the incubator, it sounds like a very impressive library. I was merely probing if it would be possible to merge or standardize some of the aspects of the projects - work together where it's possible, and differentiate where it makes sense.
-----Original Message----- From: shaposh...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Roman Shaposhnik Sent: 2. maj 2014 01:49 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > One could imagine as part of the case for incubation and graduation > both an articulation of the project's place in the larger ecosystem, > similar to how academic papers customarily place their work and novel > findings within the larger field in 'Related Work'. If not part of the > initial proposal, then at least making a good case as a criteria for > graduation, and writing up related work and how the new project > differentiates could be an initial task done on JIRA after acceptance along > the lines of the trademark search. I would be a strong +1 to modify our proposal template to include a section like that. It will be, if nothing else, a strong forcing function to spend some time considering similar projects. Thanks, Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
